The President is proposing to pay women to have children

LOL so Trump wants baby mills ?!?

So without putting too much thought into this

Wouldn't the people most likely to do this be
1. Poor
2. Poor and young

So wouldn't this contribute to societal problems by incentivizing childbirth for the wrong reasons? I mean are they offering $5,000 for each child, if so is there a cap, because maybe a healthy young person can have a child a year for 10 years and net $50,000

But then again, the average cost of having & raising a child until age 18 is

View attachment 1103635

And what about the children that are already here?

There is an ulterior motive here.
 
Not a fan of more teen mothers and more welfare moms having kids for a "signing" bonus. This is idea needs a lot of work imo.


I don't believe the govt should be spending taxpayer money on any type of social engineering, including this.

.
 
There’s a long history of some political voices accusing Black women of having children primarily for welfare benefits, often using this stereotype to justify restricting assistance. Now, with the proposed “baby bonus” policy from the Trump administration to encourage higher birth rates, the government is being asked to incentivize childbirth for the broader population.

It’s interesting to see how public attitudes toward government support for families can shift depending on which groups are perceived to benefit. Policies that were once stigmatized as “handouts” are now reframed as necessary incentives, reflecting deeper anxieties about changing demographics in America.

The push for women to have more children has a powerful ally: Trump​


The White House is emerging as a powerful ally of the burgeoning movement of people who want women to have more children, but there's little emphasis on the unique level of danger that birth poses in the U.S.

Why it matters: The U.S. population is aging, presenting complex economic and health care challenges that "pro-natalists" argue should be addressed through raising fertility rates. At the same time, the country is facing an ongoing maternal mortality crisis and a politically fraught debate over women's reproductive health that's had widespread ripple effects.

  • The pro-natalist movement is splintered into factions with different views, including some with restrictive definitions of what constitutes a family. There's also infighting over exactly how women should be reproducing — with debate around IVF and genetic screening.
  • Some of its most controversial adherents hold racist views that encouraging white people to have more babies could help maintain the race's stability.
It won't work.

Several countries are experiencing low birth rates, and they have tried all kinds of incentives to turn it around.

None of it is working.

Low birth rates will have a very deleterious effect on our economy.


MAGA is not going to like the one and only solution to this problem:


That solution is immigration.



.
 
  • Fact
Reactions: IM2
It won't work.

Several countries are experiencing low birth rates, and they have tried all kinds of incentives to turn it around.

None of it is working.

Low birth rates will have a very deleterious effect on our economy.


MAGA is not going to like the one and only solution to this problem:


That solution is immigration.



.
legal immigration ..
 
It won't work.

Several countries are experiencing low birth rates, and they have tried all kinds of incentives to turn it around.

None of it is working.

Low birth rates will have a very deleterious effect on our economy.


MAGA is not going to like the one and only solution to this problem:


That solution is immigration.



.
The effect of low birth rates is less tax revenues.
The effect of more illiterate thirdworlders is less tax revenue and more spending on free shit.
We’re better off to let the population decline.

Are you sure you thought your post through Humberto?

IMG_1182.webp
 
The effect of low birth rates is less tax revenues.
The effect of more illiterate thirdworlders is less tax revenue and more spending on free shit.
We’re better off to let the population decline.

Are you sure you thought your post through Humberto?

View attachment 1103670
Illegal immigrants pay about 100 billion in taxes. Legal immigrants pay even more.
 
I believe that whites are the only group facing decline. And of course you can't see the obvious, but whites on the right have been whining about white genocide and the need to increase white births for quite some time.
Displacement and or replacement isn’t genocide…I haven’t heard that claim.
 
I don't believe the govt should be spending taxpayer money on any type of social engineering, including this.

.
America was built on social engineering.
 
Back
Top Bottom