The Real Choice on November 8th

[rightwinger]

When you start with HRC has no accomplishments and her decades of experience don't mean anything, you basically lose the argument right of the gate and look extremely foolish doing so -- like a race horse crapping on the track right before dropping dead at the starting line.

Better luck next time.

Decades of experience?

First Lady of Arkansas?
(no experience there)

First Lady of the US?
(no experience there either)

Carpetbagged from a red state to a blue state, because she, and Bill, knew she'd never get elected in Arkansas.

Secretary of State?

Consolation prize for not being able to beat a first term senator.

It still stuns me that she was elected in New York.

It wasn't Hillary Clinton running, it was the First Lady of the United States, with all the free advertising that came with that position.

She was elected twice by wide margins

Trump has never won an election

 

[Auld Phart]

When you start with HRC has no accomplishments and her decades of experience don't mean anything, you basically lose the argument right of the gate and look extremely foolish doing so -- like a race horse crapping on the track right before dropping dead at the starting line.

Better luck next time.

Decades of experience?

First Lady of Arkansas?
(no experience there)

First Lady of the US?
(no experience there either)

Carpetbagged from a red state to a blue state, because she, and Bill, knew she'd never get elected in Arkansas.

Secretary of State?

Consolation prize for not being able to beat a first term senator.

It still stuns me that she was elected in New York.

It wasn't Hillary Clinton running, it was the First Lady of the United States, with all the free advertising that came with that position.

She was elected twice by wide margins

Trump has never won an election

She was elected twice by wide margins

In a dark blue state, against nobodies.

Would she have fared as well in Arkansas?

Why did she feel the need to carpetbag?

 

[rightwinger]

When you start with HRC has no accomplishments and her decades of experience don't mean anything, you basically lose the argument right of the gate and look extremely foolish doing so -- like a race horse crapping on the track right before dropping dead at the starting line.

Better luck next time.

Decades of experience?

First Lady of Arkansas?
(no experience there)

First Lady of the US?
(no experience there either)

Carpetbagged from a red state to a blue state, because she, and Bill, knew she'd never get elected in Arkansas.

Secretary of State?

Consolation prize for not being able to beat a first term senator.

It still stuns me that she was elected in New York.

It wasn't Hillary Clinton running, it was the First Lady of the United States, with all the free advertising that came with that position.

She was elected twice by wide margins

Trump has never won an election

She was elected twice by wide margins

In a dark blue state, against nobodies.

Would she have fared as well in Arkansas?

Why did she feel the need to carpetbag?

NY is a BIG state (20 million)
Arkansas is small potatoes (3 million)

 

[Auld Phart]

Decades of experience?

First Lady of Arkansas?
(no experience there)

First Lady of the US?
(no experience there either)

Carpetbagged from a red state to a blue state, because she, and Bill, knew she'd never get elected in Arkansas.

Secretary of State?

Consolation prize for not being able to beat a first term senator.

It still stuns me that she was elected in New York.

It wasn't Hillary Clinton running, it was the First Lady of the United States, with all the free advertising that came with that position.

She was elected twice by wide margins

Trump has never won an election

She was elected twice by wide margins

In a dark blue state, against nobodies.

Would she have fared as well in Arkansas?

Why did she feel the need to carpetbag?

NY is a BIG state (20 million)
Arkansas is small potatoes (3 million)

and the difference in population would have prevented her from getting elected in Ark?

 

[rightwinger]

It still stuns me that she was elected in New York.

It wasn't Hillary Clinton running, it was the First Lady of the United States, with all the free advertising that came with that position.

She was elected twice by wide margins

Trump has never won an election

She was elected twice by wide margins

In a dark blue state, against nobodies.

Would she have fared as well in Arkansas?

Why did she feel the need to carpetbag?

NY is a BIG state (20 million)
Arkansas is small potatoes (3 million)

and the difference in population would have prevented her from getting elected in Ark?

Hillary lived in Arkansas for 18 years
She has lived in NY for 16 years

Politically, being a Senator representing 20 million people beats being a Senator for 3 million people

 

[Auld Phart]

It wasn't Hillary Clinton running, it was the First Lady of the United States, with all the free advertising that came with that position.

She was elected twice by wide margins

Trump has never won an election

She was elected twice by wide margins

In a dark blue state, against nobodies.

Would she have fared as well in Arkansas?

Why did she feel the need to carpetbag?

NY is a BIG state (20 million)
Arkansas is small potatoes (3 million)

and the difference in population would have prevented her from getting elected in Ark?

Hillary lived in Arkansas for 18 years
She has lived in NY for 16 years

Politically, being a Senator representing 20 million people beats being a Senator for 3 million people

Why can't you admit she couldn't have been elected dog catcher in Ark?

She had to move to a blue state to have any chance at all.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

View attachment 90308

 

[rightwinger]

She was elected twice by wide margins

Trump has never won an election

She was elected twice by wide margins

In a dark blue state, against nobodies.

Would she have fared as well in Arkansas?

Why did she feel the need to carpetbag?

NY is a BIG state (20 million)
Arkansas is small potatoes (3 million)

and the difference in population would have prevented her from getting elected in Ark?

Hillary lived in Arkansas for 18 years
She has lived in NY for 16 years

Politically, being a Senator representing 20 million people beats being a Senator for 3 million people

Why can't you admit she couldn't have been elected dog catcher in Ark?

She had to move to a blue state to have any chance at all.

The Clintons had moved beyond their Arkansas roots. I doubt Obama will move back to Illinois either

Being a Senator from NY is more prestigious than a Senator from Arkansas. Hillary was also a highly respected and highly rated Senator during her time in the Senate...from both sides of the aisle

 

[Wry Catcher]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

HRC, for the real reasons, not those made up by SGS49:

• Diplomacy trumps Brinkmanship
• Building bridges trumps burning bridges
• Fiscal responsible policy trumps austerity / fiscal conservatism
• It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher
• win-win efforts trump zero-sum efforts

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

In a dark blue state, against nobodies.

Would she have fared as well in Arkansas?

Why did she feel the need to carpetbag?

NY is a BIG state (20 million)
Arkansas is small potatoes (3 million)

and the difference in population would have prevented her from getting elected in Ark?

Hillary lived in Arkansas for 18 years
She has lived in NY for 16 years

Politically, being a Senator representing 20 million people beats being a Senator for 3 million people

Why can't you admit she couldn't have been elected dog catcher in Ark?

She had to move to a blue state to have any chance at all.

The Clintons had moved beyond their Arkansas roots. I doubt Obama will move back to Illinois either

Being a Senator from NY is more prestigious than a Senator from Arkansas. Hillary was also a highly respected and highly rated Senator during her time in the Senate...from both sides of the aisle

Nothing like a bunch of establishment political hacks who respected her, for enabling her husband to be a womanizer. A senator who wanted to go to war in Iraq and oust Saddam Hussein, before she was against it. Yeah, this is why most of the US "Citizens" want Trump for president. They are tired of the likes of Jeb Bush, and any other established politician who don't listen to the people, for the people, by the people.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

HRC, for the real reasons, not those made up by you.

• Diplomacy trumps Brinkmanship
• Building bridges trumps burning bridges
• Fiscal responsible policy trumps austerity / fiscal conservatism
• It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher
• win-win efforts trump zero-sum efforts

Hillary is diving in the polls like a Stuka over Poland.


No, President Obama, Black America Doesn't Owe You a Vote for Hillary!

Mr. President, our reasons for voting for Hillary Clinton should be because she represents the best person for our community compared to Donald Trump, not because it would be a personal affront to YOU.

Just like the Democratic Party doesn't own our votes, neither do you.

Should we take it personally that she called us "super predators"? Clearly, even though she has since apologized, that hasn't been forgotten. Should we take it personally that the 1994 Crime Bill signed into law by her husband, and championed by Hillary Clinton, wreaked havoc on our community?

 

[rightwinger]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

HRC, for the real reasons, not those made up by SGS49:

• Diplomacy trumps Brinkmanship
• Building bridges trumps burning bridges
• Fiscal responsible policy trumps austerity / fiscal conservatism
• It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher
• win-win efforts trump zero-sum efforts

It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher

Love that

 

[Auld Phart]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

HRC, for the real reasons, not those made up by SGS49:

• Diplomacy trumps Brinkmanship
• Building bridges trumps burning bridges
• Fiscal responsible policy trumps austerity / fiscal conservatism
• It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher
• win-win efforts trump zero-sum efforts

It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher

Love that

and when she went to NY, the village lost it's idiot

 

[rightwinger]

NY is a BIG state (20 million)
Arkansas is small potatoes (3 million)

and the difference in population would have prevented her from getting elected in Ark?

Hillary lived in Arkansas for 18 years
She has lived in NY for 16 years

Politically, being a Senator representing 20 million people beats being a Senator for 3 million people

Why can't you admit she couldn't have been elected dog catcher in Ark?

She had to move to a blue state to have any chance at all.

The Clintons had moved beyond their Arkansas roots. I doubt Obama will move back to Illinois either

Being a Senator from NY is more prestigious than a Senator from Arkansas. Hillary was also a highly respected and highly rated Senator during her time in the Senate...from both sides of the aisle

Nothing like a bunch of establishment political hacks who respected her, for enabling her husband to be a womanizer. A senator who wanted to go to war in Iraq and oust Saddam Hussein, before she was against it. Yeah, this is why most of the US "Citizens" want Trump for president. They are tired of the likes of Jeb Bush, and any other established politician who don't listen to the people, for the people, by the people.

If progressing from First Lady to Senator and Secretary of State is so easy....Why have no other First Ladies come close to the accomplishment?

The reason was that Hillary was a highly respected First Lady. The idea of most First Ladies running for office would have been a joke.....Hilary was very serious

I understand that Conservatives hate her...if they didn't. she wouldn't have been doing her job

Hillary is going to be your next President....get used to the idea

 

[rightwinger]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

HRC, for the real reasons, not those made up by SGS49:

• Diplomacy trumps Brinkmanship
• Building bridges trumps burning bridges
• Fiscal responsible policy trumps austerity / fiscal conservatism
• It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher
• win-win efforts trump zero-sum efforts

It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher

Love that

and when she went to NY, the village lost it's idiot

Far from it....she was highly respected in New York...still is

So much so that NY is overwhelmingly supporting Hillary over native son Trump

 

[Wry Catcher]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

HRC, for the real reasons, not those made up by SGS49:

• Diplomacy trumps Brinkmanship
• Building bridges trumps burning bridges
• Fiscal responsible policy trumps austerity / fiscal conservatism
• It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher
• win-win efforts trump zero-sum efforts

It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher

Love that

and when she went to NY, the village lost it's idiot

Example of Idiot-gram ^^^

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

HRC, for the real reasons, not those made up by SGS49:

• Diplomacy trumps Brinkmanship
• Building bridges trumps burning bridges
• Fiscal responsible policy trumps austerity / fiscal conservatism
• It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher
• win-win efforts trump zero-sum efforts

It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher

Love that

and when she went to NY, the village lost it's idiot

Far from it....she was highly respected in New York...still is

So much so that NY is overwhelmingly supporting Hillary over native son Trump

Thank God for the Republic of the United States of America. Since all states have a hand in electing the next president, just because Hillary is loved by New York, doesn't mean the rest of the country does. Democracy would have the election go to Hillary, but the battle ground states will choose Trump. People of the US want to be safe, not more Muslims with the intent to kill US any time they want. Now stop being the village idiot.

 

[rightwinger]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

HRC, for the real reasons, not those made up by SGS49:

• Diplomacy trumps Brinkmanship
• Building bridges trumps burning bridges
• Fiscal responsible policy trumps austerity / fiscal conservatism
• It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher
• win-win efforts trump zero-sum efforts

It takes a village to raise a child, not a voucher

Love that

and when she went to NY, the village lost it's idiot

Far from it....she was highly respected in New York...still is

So much so that NY is overwhelmingly supporting Hillary over native son Trump

Thank God for the Republic of the United States of America. Since all states have a hand in electing the next president, just because Hillary is loved by New York, doesn't mean the rest of the country does. Democracy would have the election go to Hillary, but the battle ground states will choose Trump. People of the US want to be safe, not more Muslims with the intent to kill US any time they want. Now stop being the village idiot.

What a ridiculous post....unworthy of further response