The Right To Destroy Jewish History

Temple Mount: pro-Hamas inscriptions sprayed on ancient stones

Inscriptions sprayed in favor of Hamas were found on the Temple Mount.
Tom Nisni, CEO of Beyadeinu, said: 'Everything starts and ends on the Temple Mount - we must enforce it!'

At noon today (Wed), the guides of the organization 'Beyadeinu' discovered inflammatory inscriptions sprayed on ancient stones in the east of the Temple Mount, on the eastern path where Jews routinely gather for prayers. On the stones was written: Abu Obida, the resistance of Hamas'. Abu Obida is the spokesman for Hamas.

WhatsApp-Image-2024-09-25-at-16.09.31.jpeg
WhatsApp-Image-2024-09-25-at-16.09.30__w650h331q80.jpeg



Tom Nisani, CEO of Beyadeinu: 'Everything starts and ends on the Temple Mount. The good news will go out from the mountain to the entire Middle East - the Jews are not to be messed with!

The municipality must immediately remove the inflammatory inscriptions, the police have the duty to protect the antiquities on the Temple Mount from similar phenomena and to immediately locate and arrest the Hamas terrorists who infiltrated the Temple Mount'.



In direct defiance of the status quo, Waqf digging of
Solomon's Stables under the Temple Mount


 
Last edited:
RE: The Right To Destroy Jewish History
SUBTOPIC: Relevance of Ancient History and the Current Situation
โœโ†’ et al,
When examining the territorial and political zones of control โ†’ two, three, or four millenniums back in time, many nations and cultures survived or would not be recognizable today.
To solve today's disputes rests with the reality of today โ†’ not historically.

The reasoning used by the grand leaders of the Allied Powers made, at the beginning of the 20th Century, is a matter of record. The Arab Palestinians of the former Enemy Occupied Territory (
associated and entangled with the defeated Empire) who refused to accept the outcome is what it is. The hostility of the Arab Palestinians of the former Enemy Occupied Territory and their lack of self-improvement and human development only demonstrates just how dangerous they are; unworthy of command and control of any political subdivision.


Most Respectively,
R
 
[ Bronze Age.....Philistines, invaders, were not Arabs or Palestinians. Herodotus had not yet lived and named the coastal Philistine area, Palestine. It was called Canaan. And Arabs want the world to forget the names and Nations which lived there at the time ]

 
RE: The Right To Destroy Jewish History
SUBTOPIC: Realities of Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Activist
โœโ†’ et al,

This event is just one of the symptoms humanity must suffer (including the Britians) for being too tolerant of these anti-social and violent communities.

Sixties Fan said:
"Pro-Pals in Brighton just mobbed my local shopping centre shouting โ€œfrom the river to the seaโ€ which is a genocidal slogan."
(COMMENT)

All the nations of Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa, as well as the entire Arab League, that pander to these violent communities, will begin to feel the pain and cost of not suppressing these religious fanatics and cleaning up this mess. The Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Activist pose a continuing threat to everyone; not just the Jewish National Home.

1725791645336.png

1725791700982.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
Irelandโ€™s National Council for Curriculum and Assessment is under mounting pressure to overhaul its textbook review procedures following a damaging report that exposes systematic inaccuracies in how Jewish history and Israel are presented to students.

The report, published by the Jerusalem-based research institute IMPACT-se, identified concerning patterns across multiple textbooks used in Irish schools.

Among the most glaring examples is a 2020 religious studies text that incorrectly places Jesusโ€™s birth in โ€œPalestine,โ€ rather than the historically accurate Judea.

(full article online)


 
[ The Right To Destroy Anyone's History. Whole world is Islam. Whole World is Palestinian ]

 
Part 1

At the Jerusalem Post, Michael Freund an utterly inoffensive op-ed that pointed out the obvious: that the borders of ancient Israel are not congruent with today's borders of the State of Israel.


As the IDF battles to clear southern Lebanon of Hezbollah terrorists, it is worth highlighting an intriguing historical fact, one that many seem to have forgotten.

Having grown up with an international boundary between the Jewish state and our neighbors to the north, we take it for granted that this is how it has always been and should be.

But the truth is that the current border between Israel and Lebanon is little more than a century old and is entirely artificial, a relic of a time when European colonialists whimsically drew lines on maps over a bottle of brandy in smoke-filled rooms.

Historically speaking, southern Lebanon is in fact northern Israel, and the roots of the Jewish people in the area run deep. Whether or not this can or should be translated now into a political reality is a far more complex question, but there is simply no denying our connection to the land.
He is in no way advocating annexing southern Lebanon, just as no one is seriously contemplating annexing parts of Jordan that also lie within the boundaries of ancient Israel - nor is anyone talking about giving up the Negev which was not part of the old borders, as this nineteenth century map shows.




 
Part 2

But Hezbollah mouthpiece Al Mayadeen is freaking out:

Michael Freund, an American-born Israeli political figure of German descent, believes that southern Lebanon is historically part of "Israel" and that the Jewish people have deep-rooted connections to the area.
A recent opinion piece in The Jerusalem Post, titled "Southern Lebanon is Actually Northern Israel," exemplifies yet another attempt to legitimize expansionist ambitions through what can only be described as Zionist propaganda.
The article undermines Lebanon's sovereignty while distorting Judaism by weaponizing it to rationalize territorial conquest.


The New Arab also slammed the piece, without contradicting it.

Because everything Freund says is true and no one can seriously doubt it (although the exact borders of ancient Israel are always matters of dispute and they changed over time.)

There are two real questions one might want to ask.

One is is why the map above of what are clearly the 12 Tribes of Israel calls the area "Palestine?" The answer is, of course, that the term "Palestine" was historically used as a synonym for the Holy Land or the Land of Israel. It never referred to a land of Palestinian Arabs.

The second question is what, exactly, is "historic Palestine" that the Palestinians claim to have heritage over? All of those maps are indeed based on when "European colonialists whimsically drew lines on maps over a bottle of brandy in smoke-filled rooms." They consider the colonial boundaries of the 20th century to be their age-old lands - which is ridiculous.

Yet while they love pointing to these maps and claiming that it proves that "Palestine" is a historic country, they never use those same maps to claim their own stake in parts of Jordan, Lebanon and Syria.

No, for some reason the only lands they ever claimed as their historic homeland always coincides with the land that Jews control, and no more. And this includes before 1967 when they made no claims on the West Bank.

Funny how the more you look at their claims of having been part of a historical Palestine for thousands of years, the less tenable their claims turn out to be.


 
The Journal of Palestine Studies recently published a paper named "Fire as Elemental Intifada in Colonized Palestine."

The abstract seems to celebrate a devastating 2021 fire in the forests near Jerusalem as a type of "intifada."
In August 2021, wildfires erupted in the southwestern hills of Jerusalem, engulfing and ultimately destroying up to 20,000 dunums of pine forests planted by Israeli settlers. The burned landscape revealed a stunning vista of terraced hillsides, a visual testament to the existence of Palestinian land-based relations hidden under the camouflaging foliage. In this experimental visual essay, fire is postulated as an elemental force of Indigenous Palestinian resistance to the ongoing conditions of environmental and human Nakba imposed on Palestinian lands and bodies under Zionist settler colonialism. Fire, as a transformative and atmosphere-altering medium, is thus theorized and visualized as elemental intifada.


------------

The Hebrew word used for "steps" is "madregot" - almost certainly the source for the Arabic "mudrajat" mentioned in Haaretz as proof of the Palestinian origins of the methods.

So literally everything being claimed by the Palestinians now about these forests is a lie. It was not their innovation, Jews didn't plant trees to erase them but to save local farming, and the Arab leaders at the time supported the reforestation plan to counter the damage done under Ottoman Muslim rule.

Not only are today's Palestinians lying, but they are celebrating the destruction of forests in Israel and the environmental damage that results. When it comes down to it, all their moral posturing and supposed love of the land is outweighed by their immense hate of Jews.

(full article online)


 
Palestinian media outlets have castigated the new biblical epic โ€œMaryโ€ coming to Netflix next month because of the filmโ€™s Israeli cast, falsely accusing Israel of perpetrating a โ€œgenocideโ€ against Palestinian Christians.

Netflix announced earlier this month the coming release of โ€œMary,โ€ which according to a synopsis provided by the streaming giant โ€œtells the story of one of historyโ€™s most profound figures and the remarkable journey that led to the birth of Jesus.โ€

Notable in the cast are Noa Cohen in the titular role as Jesusโ€™s mother and Ido Tako as her husband Joseph โ€” two Israeli actors under the spotlight in a large-scale production depicting Jewish life during a period when Jews were the primary ethnic group of the region.

Director DJ Caruso previously defended casting Israeli actors for the roles.

โ€œIt was important to us that Mary, along with most of our primary cast, be selected from Israel to ensure authenticity,โ€ he told Entertainment Weekly last month.

Nonetheless, the castings were met with derision among anti-Israel activists on social media and elsewhere upset with the choice of selecting Israeli actors. Critics called for a boycott of the film, claiming that Mary and Joseph were โ€œPalestinianโ€ despite them being Jewish and living in modern-day Israel.

Among those expressing outrage was Quds Media Network, the self-described โ€œlargest independent youth Palestinian news network,โ€ which lambasted the production, publishing an article tying โ€œMaryโ€ to what it called the โ€œongoing genocide of Christians in Palestine.โ€

The article, quoting Father Abdullah Julio of the Melkite Greek Catholic Monastery in Ramallah, alleged that one of Israelโ€™s goals is โ€œthe eradication of Christian presence in the region.โ€


(full article online)


 

Texas is poised to adopt a public school curriculum that refers to Jesus as โ€œthe Messiah,โ€ asks kindergartners to study the Sermon on the Mount and presents the Crusades in a positive light.​


UPDATE: The Texas State Board of Education voted 8-7 on Friday to approve the curriculum.

Most of the time, as the senior rabbi of Temple Beth-El in San Antonio, Rabbi Mara Nathanโ€™s focus is on Jewish families. But this week, sheโ€™s finding herself thinking about Christian ones, too.

Thatโ€™s because Texas is poised to adopt a public school curriculum that refers to Jesus as โ€œthe Messiah,โ€ asks kindergartners to study the Sermon on the Mount and presents the Crusades in a positive light.

The curriculum, Nathan said, โ€œgives Christian children the sense that their familyโ€™s religion is the only true religion, which is not appropriate for public school education, at the very least.โ€

Nathan is among the many Texans raising concerns about the proposed reading curriculum as it nears final approval. Earlier this week, the Texas State Board of Education narrowly voted to proceed with the curriculum, called Bluebonnet Learning. A final vote is set for Friday.

The critics, who include Jewish parents and organizations as well as interfaith and education advocacy groups, say Bluebonnet โ€” which will be optional but which schools would be paid to adopt โ€” inappropriately centers on Christian theology and ideas. They have been lobbying for revisions since it was first proposed in May, offering detailed feedback.

โ€œThe first round of the curriculum that we saw honestly had a lot of offensive content in it, and was proselytizing, and did not represent Jewish people well,โ€ said Lisa Epstein, the director of San Antonioโ€™s Jewish Community Relations Council.

Now those critics say most of their specific suggestions have been accepted but they remain concerned.

โ€œLooking at the revision, we still feel that the curriculum is not balanced and it introduces a lot of Christian concepts at a very young age, like resurrection and the blood of Christ and the Messiah, when kids are just really too young to understand and they donโ€™t really have a grasp yet completely of their own religion,โ€ she added. Epstein, who testified at a hearing on the proposal in Austin on Monday, has a child in high school and two others who graduated from Texas public schools.

The Texas vote comes as advocates of inserting Christianity into public education are ascendant across the country. Political conservatives are in power at the national level and the Supreme Courtโ€™s conservative supermajority has demonstrated openness to blurring church-state separation.

 

Texas is poised to adopt a public school curriculum that refers to Jesus as โ€œthe Messiah,โ€ asks kindergartners to study the Sermon on the Mount and presents the Crusades in a positive light.​


UPDATE: The Texas State Board of Education voted 8-7 on Friday to approve the curriculum.

Most of the time, as the senior rabbi of Temple Beth-El in San Antonio, Rabbi Mara Nathanโ€™s focus is on Jewish families. But this week, sheโ€™s finding herself thinking about Christian ones, too.

Thatโ€™s because Texas is poised to adopt a public school curriculum that refers to Jesus as โ€œthe Messiah,โ€ asks kindergartners to study the Sermon on the Mount and presents the Crusades in a positive light.

The curriculum, Nathan said, โ€œgives Christian children the sense that their familyโ€™s religion is the only true religion, which is not appropriate for public school education, at the very least.โ€

Nathan is among the many Texans raising concerns about the proposed reading curriculum as it nears final approval. Earlier this week, the Texas State Board of Education narrowly voted to proceed with the curriculum, called Bluebonnet Learning. A final vote is set for Friday.

The critics, who include Jewish parents and organizations as well as interfaith and education advocacy groups, say Bluebonnet โ€” which will be optional but which schools would be paid to adopt โ€” inappropriately centers on Christian theology and ideas. They have been lobbying for revisions since it was first proposed in May, offering detailed feedback.

โ€œThe first round of the curriculum that we saw honestly had a lot of offensive content in it, and was proselytizing, and did not represent Jewish people well,โ€ said Lisa Epstein, the director of San Antonioโ€™s Jewish Community Relations Council.

Now those critics say most of their specific suggestions have been accepted but they remain concerned.

โ€œLooking at the revision, we still feel that the curriculum is not balanced and it introduces a lot of Christian concepts at a very young age, like resurrection and the blood of Christ and the Messiah, when kids are just really too young to understand and they donโ€™t really have a grasp yet completely of their own religion,โ€ she added. Epstein, who testified at a hearing on the proposal in Austin on Monday, has a child in high school and two others who graduated from Texas public schools.

The Texas vote comes as advocates of inserting Christianity into public education are ascendant across the country. Political conservatives are in power at the national level and the Supreme Courtโ€™s conservative supermajority has demonstrated openness to blurring church-state separation.


What was wrong with the Crusades?
 

Forum List

Back
Top