The Steele dossier paid for by Clinton, DNC was not Russian disinformation, it was British disinformation—from Steele

Billiejeens

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2019
33,168
21,689
1,845
The intelligence in the dossier by former British spy Christopher Steele, paid for by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign, was not from a well-placed source in the Russian government, but a paid-for employee of Steele’s firm, Orbis, who disputed the findings of the dossier when they were published on Jan. 10, 2017 by Buzzfeed.

This, from the bombshell now declassified Jan. 24, 2017 interview by the FBI with the sub-source that was only undertaken two weeks after the false allegations against President Donald Trump and his campaign — that they were Russian agents who had helped Moscow hack the DNC and put its emails onto Wikileaks — became public.

Those allegations were debunked by none other than former Special Counsel Robert Mueller, but he never included the sub-source interview in his March 2019 report. That would not come until later from Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz in Dec. 2019 when he summarized the interview, which has now been declassified by the Senate Judiciary Committee.



BJ -
Tick Tock - Woke Ones.
 
Wow, you just woke and figured that out now? Holy slow on the uptake, Batman!
after the sub-source interview in Jan. 2017, Strzok had already debunked the Steele dossier. Therefore, the FBI’s and the Justice Department’s continuing assertion to the FISA court through June that “the FBI believes that Russia’s efforts to influence U.S. policy were likely being coordinated between the RIS [Russian Intelligence Services] and Page, and possibly others” was most certainly false.

If so, an outstanding question now is whether any crimes were committed by the FBI and the Justice Department when the inaccurate warrant applications were submitted
No. It goes far beyond that. Misdirection. It's not at all the stupid Party politics game depicted. The Steele dossier contained garbage obviously concocted by the MIC (FBI, CIA, Pentagon, NSA, etc) to make it appear Russian in origin. That can't simply be glossed over. The MIC doesn't give a rat's ass who wins any election. Both major Parties have demonstrated themselves solidly pro endless war. The President ends up being their bitch regardless. The MIC's interest in doing so was simply to continue making the Russians appear our enemy and a significant threat, justifying endless military spending. Business as usual and none will ever be charged.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top