This Is Why The United States Cannot Simply Return Those In The Country Illegally to Their Country of Origin

NewsVine_Mariyam

Platinum Member
Mar 3, 2018
10,634
7,216
1,030
The Beautiful Pacific Northwest
This mass deportation effort involves multiple steps and I haven't heard yet how they plan to accomplish anything other than terrorizing folks with the roundup:
  1. Identifying those in the country unlawfully
    a. Identifying those whose locations are known
  2. Identifying destinations for deportees
  3. Identifying means of transport
Since this is not my job the above is all I could come up with off the top of my head but the following is an explanation as to why this process is not as straight forward as we have been led to believe:

The United States can request that other nations accept their citizens who are subject to deportation, but it cannot unilaterally compel compliance. The success of such efforts depends on international law, diplomatic relations, and the cooperation of the receiving country. Here's an overview:

1. International Obligations

  • Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963):
    • This treaty outlines the framework for consular relations between independent countries, including the obligation to accept the return of their nationals.
    • The U.S. can notify the consulate of the individual's home country and request travel documents to facilitate deportation.
  • Domestic Immigration Law:
    • U.S. immigration laws authorize the deportation of individuals unlawfully present or otherwise removable.
    • Deportation requires the receiving country's cooperation to issue necessary travel documents, such as passports or emergency travel certificates.

2. Challenges in Enforcing Returns

  • Non-Cooperation by Receiving Countries:
    • Some nations delay or refuse to accept deportees, citing issues like lack of proper identification, disputed citizenship, or political reasons.
    • For example, countries like China have historically been less cooperative in accepting deportees.
  • Stateless Individuals:
    • Deportation becomes more complicated if the individual cannot be definitively linked to a country of citizenship.

3. U.S. Actions to Encourage Compliance

The U.S. employs several strategies to encourage other nations to cooperate with deportations:
  • Visa Sanctions:
    • Under Section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the U.S. can suspend the issuance of visas to citizens of countries that refuse or unreasonably delay accepting deportees.
    • In 2017, the U.S. imposed visa sanctions on countries like Eritrea, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Cambodia for non-cooperation.
  • Diplomatic Pressure:
    • The U.S. engages in bilateral negotiations to encourage compliance, sometimes offering foreign aid or other concessions in exchange for cooperation.
  • Repatriation Agreements:
    • The U.S. enters into formal agreements with some countries to streamline the deportation process, including timelines and procedures for issuing travel documents.

4. Human Rights Considerations

  • Non-Refoulement Principle:
    • International law prohibits deporting individuals to countries where they would face persecution, torture, or other inhumane treatment.
    • This principle is codified in U.S. law under the Refugee Act of 1980.
  • Asylum and Due Process:
    • Individuals have the right to apply for asylum or other relief from deportation, which can delay or prevent removal.

5. Enforcement Challenges

  • Immigration Detention Limits:
    • If a country refuses to accept its citizen, the U.S. may not be able to detain the individual indefinitely.
    • The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) established that immigrants cannot be detained beyond a presumptively reasonable period (six months) if deportation is not reasonably foreseeable.

Conclusion

While the United States has legal and diplomatic tools to encourage countries to accept their citizens, it cannot compel compliance. Success often depends on the willingness of the receiving nation, international agreements, and geopolitical factors. When countries refuse to cooperate, deportation efforts can be delayed or halted, highlighting the complex interplay of law, diplomacy, and international relations in immigration enforcement.
Sources
Favicon
 
This mass deportation effort involves multiple steps and I haven't heard yet how they plan to accomplish anything other than terrorizing folks with the roundup:
  1. Identifying those in the country unlawfully
    a. Identifying those whose locations are known
  2. Identifying destinations for deportees
  3. Identifying means of transport
Since this is not my job the above is all I could come up with off the top of my head but the following is an explanation as to why this process is not as straight forward as we have been led to believe:

The United States can request that other nations accept their citizens who are subject to deportation, but it cannot unilaterally compel compliance. The success of such efforts depends on international law, diplomatic relations, and the cooperation of the receiving country. Here's an overview:

1. International Obligations

  • Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963):
    • This treaty outlines the framework for consular relations between independent countries, including the obligation to accept the return of their nationals.
    • The U.S. can notify the consulate of the individual's home country and request travel documents to facilitate deportation.
  • Domestic Immigration Law:
    • U.S. immigration laws authorize the deportation of individuals unlawfully present or otherwise removable.
    • Deportation requires the receiving country's cooperation to issue necessary travel documents, such as passports or emergency travel certificates.

2. Challenges in Enforcing Returns

  • Non-Cooperation by Receiving Countries:
    • Some nations delay or refuse to accept deportees, citing issues like lack of proper identification, disputed citizenship, or political reasons.
    • For example, countries like China have historically been less cooperative in accepting deportees.
  • Stateless Individuals:
    • Deportation becomes more complicated if the individual cannot be definitively linked to a country of citizenship.

3. U.S. Actions to Encourage Compliance

The U.S. employs several strategies to encourage other nations to cooperate with deportations:
  • Visa Sanctions:
    • Under Section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the U.S. can suspend the issuance of visas to citizens of countries that refuse or unreasonably delay accepting deportees.
    • In 2017, the U.S. imposed visa sanctions on countries like Eritrea, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Cambodia for non-cooperation.
  • Diplomatic Pressure:
    • The U.S. engages in bilateral negotiations to encourage compliance, sometimes offering foreign aid or other concessions in exchange for cooperation.
  • Repatriation Agreements:
    • The U.S. enters into formal agreements with some countries to streamline the deportation process, including timelines and procedures for issuing travel documents.

4. Human Rights Considerations

  • Non-Refoulement Principle:
    • International law prohibits deporting individuals to countries where they would face persecution, torture, or other inhumane treatment.
    • This principle is codified in U.S. law under the Refugee Act of 1980.
  • Asylum and Due Process:
    • Individuals have the right to apply for asylum or other relief from deportation, which can delay or prevent removal.

5. Enforcement Challenges

  • Immigration Detention Limits:
    • If a country refuses to accept its citizen, the U.S. may not be able to detain the individual indefinitely.
    • The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) established that immigrants cannot be detained beyond a presumptively reasonable period (six months) if deportation is not reasonably foreseeable.

Conclusion

While the United States has legal and diplomatic tools to encourage countries to accept their citizens, it cannot compel compliance. Success often depends on the willingness of the receiving nation, international agreements, and geopolitical factors. When countries refuse to cooperate, deportation efforts can be delayed or halted, highlighting the complex interplay of law, diplomacy, and international relations in immigration enforcement.
Sources
Favicon
Regarding your conclusion: One word: Parachutes.
 
The United States can request that other nations accept their citizens who are subject to deportation, but it cannot unilaterally compel compliance.
It is clear that you've never lived anywhere near the US southern border. People are returned to Mexico on a daily basis, many immediately after illegally entering the country and many more from border checkpoints located within 100 miles of the US border. Mexico doesn't have any say. They came from there and they are returned there. This has been happening daily for at least sixty years that I am personally aware of. I have witnessed the returns of many.
 
This mass deportation effort involves multiple steps and I haven't heard yet how they plan to accomplish anything other than terrorizing folks with the roundup:
  1. Identifying those in the country unlawfully
    a. Identifying those whose locations are known
  2. Identifying destinations for deportees
  3. Identifying means of transport
Since this is not my job the above is all I could come up with off the top of my head but the following is an explanation as to why this process is not as straight forward as we have been led to believe:

The United States can request that other nations accept their citizens who are subject to deportation, but it cannot unilaterally compel compliance. The success of such efforts depends on international law, diplomatic relations, and the cooperation of the receiving country. Here's an overview:

1. International Obligations

  • Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963):
    • This treaty outlines the framework for consular relations between independent countries, including the obligation to accept the return of their nationals.
    • The U.S. can notify the consulate of the individual's home country and request travel documents to facilitate deportation.
  • Domestic Immigration Law:
    • U.S. immigration laws authorize the deportation of individuals unlawfully present or otherwise removable.
    • Deportation requires the receiving country's cooperation to issue necessary travel documents, such as passports or emergency travel certificates.

2. Challenges in Enforcing Returns

  • Non-Cooperation by Receiving Countries:
    • Some nations delay or refuse to accept deportees, citing issues like lack of proper identification, disputed citizenship, or political reasons.
    • For example, countries like China have historically been less cooperative in accepting deportees.
  • Stateless Individuals:
    • Deportation becomes more complicated if the individual cannot be definitively linked to a country of citizenship.

3. U.S. Actions to Encourage Compliance

The U.S. employs several strategies to encourage other nations to cooperate with deportations:
  • Visa Sanctions:
    • Under Section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the U.S. can suspend the issuance of visas to citizens of countries that refuse or unreasonably delay accepting deportees.
    • In 2017, the U.S. imposed visa sanctions on countries like Eritrea, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Cambodia for non-cooperation.
  • Diplomatic Pressure:
    • The U.S. engages in bilateral negotiations to encourage compliance, sometimes offering foreign aid or other concessions in exchange for cooperation.
  • Repatriation Agreements:
    • The U.S. enters into formal agreements with some countries to streamline the deportation process, including timelines and procedures for issuing travel documents.

4. Human Rights Considerations

  • Non-Refoulement Principle:
    • International law prohibits deporting individuals to countries where they would face persecution, torture, or other inhumane treatment.
    • This principle is codified in U.S. law under the Refugee Act of 1980.
  • Asylum and Due Process:
    • Individuals have the right to apply for asylum or other relief from deportation, which can delay or prevent removal.

5. Enforcement Challenges

  • Immigration Detention Limits:
    • If a country refuses to accept its citizen, the U.S. may not be able to detain the individual indefinitely.
    • The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) established that immigrants cannot be detained beyond a presumptively reasonable period (six months) if deportation is not reasonably foreseeable.

Conclusion

While the United States has legal and diplomatic tools to encourage countries to accept their citizens, it cannot compel compliance. Success often depends on the willingness of the receiving nation, international agreements, and geopolitical factors. When countries refuse to cooperate, deportation efforts can be delayed or halted, highlighting the complex interplay of law, diplomacy, and international relations in immigration enforcement.
Sources
Favicon
Well, NYC alone has at least 14 hotels filled with illegals. Lets start there.


NYC now using 14 hotels to house migrants amid ongoing surge: officials
 
Well, NYC alone has at least 14 hotels filled with illegals. Lets start there.


NYC now using 14 hotels to house migrants amid ongoing surge: officials
I am sure there are plenty that Biden planted in red states and municipalities. They know who and where they are and I'm sure they'll be high on the list. LOL, probably before sanctuary cities. Those need to pay for their stupidity. I hear Eric Adams is offering to help Trump's efforts in NYC. LMAO, too little too late Eric.
 
I am sure there are plenty that Biden planted in red states and municipalities. They know who and where they are and I'm sure they'll be high on the list. LOL, probably before sanctuary cities. Those need to pay for their stupidity. I hear Eric Adams is offering to help Trump's efforts in NYC. LMAO, too little too late Eric.
Sounds like a great time to start promoting "see something, say something".
 
This mass deportation effort involves multiple steps and I haven't heard yet how they plan to accomplish anything other than terrorizing folks with the roundup:
  1. Identifying those in the country unlawfully
    a. Identifying those whose locations are known
  2. Identifying destinations for deportees
  3. Identifying means of transport
Since this is not my job the above is all I could come up with off the top of my head but the following is an explanation as to why this process is not as straight forward as we have been led to believe:

The United States can request that other nations accept their citizens who are subject to deportation, but it cannot unilaterally compel compliance. The success of such efforts depends on international law, diplomatic relations, and the cooperation of the receiving country. Here's an overview:

1. International Obligations

  • Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963):
    • This treaty outlines the framework for consular relations between independent countries, including the obligation to accept the return of their nationals.
    • The U.S. can notify the consulate of the individual's home country and request travel documents to facilitate deportation.
  • Domestic Immigration Law:
    • U.S. immigration laws authorize the deportation of individuals unlawfully present or otherwise removable.
    • Deportation requires the receiving country's cooperation to issue necessary travel documents, such as passports or emergency travel certificates.

2. Challenges in Enforcing Returns

  • Non-Cooperation by Receiving Countries:
    • Some nations delay or refuse to accept deportees, citing issues like lack of proper identification, disputed citizenship, or political reasons.
    • For example, countries like China have historically been less cooperative in accepting deportees.
  • Stateless Individuals:
    • Deportation becomes more complicated if the individual cannot be definitively linked to a country of citizenship.

3. U.S. Actions to Encourage Compliance

The U.S. employs several strategies to encourage other nations to cooperate with deportations:
  • Visa Sanctions:
    • Under Section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the U.S. can suspend the issuance of visas to citizens of countries that refuse or unreasonably delay accepting deportees.
    • In 2017, the U.S. imposed visa sanctions on countries like Eritrea, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Cambodia for non-cooperation.
  • Diplomatic Pressure:
    • The U.S. engages in bilateral negotiations to encourage compliance, sometimes offering foreign aid or other concessions in exchange for cooperation.
  • Repatriation Agreements:
    • The U.S. enters into formal agreements with some countries to streamline the deportation process, including timelines and procedures for issuing travel documents.

4. Human Rights Considerations

  • Non-Refoulement Principle:
    • International law prohibits deporting individuals to countries where they would face persecution, torture, or other inhumane treatment.
    • This principle is codified in U.S. law under the Refugee Act of 1980.
  • Asylum and Due Process:
    • Individuals have the right to apply for asylum or other relief from deportation, which can delay or prevent removal.

5. Enforcement Challenges

  • Immigration Detention Limits:
    • If a country refuses to accept its citizen, the U.S. may not be able to detain the individual indefinitely.
    • The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) established that immigrants cannot be detained beyond a presumptively reasonable period (six months) if deportation is not reasonably foreseeable.

Conclusion

While the United States has legal and diplomatic tools to encourage countries to accept their citizens, it cannot compel compliance. Success often depends on the willingness of the receiving nation, international agreements, and geopolitical factors. When countries refuse to cooperate, deportation efforts can be delayed or halted, highlighting the complex interplay of law, diplomacy, and international relations in immigration enforcement.
Sources
Favicon

We simply can, actually. With the exception of the countries not taking them back, which presents an obstacle, we are not obligated to abide by any of this other BS.
 
This mass deportation effort involves multiple steps and I haven't heard yet how they plan to accomplish anything other than terrorizing folks with the roundup:
  1. Identifying those in the country unlawfully
    a. Identifying those whose locations are known
  2. Identifying destinations for deportees
  3. Identifying means of transport
Since this is not my job the above is all I could come up with off the top of my head but the following is an explanation as to why this process is not as straight forward as we have been led to believe:

The United States can request that other nations accept their citizens who are subject to deportation, but it cannot unilaterally compel compliance. The success of such efforts depends on international law, diplomatic relations, and the cooperation of the receiving country. Here's an overview:

1. International Obligations

  • Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963):
    • This treaty outlines the framework for consular relations between independent countries, including the obligation to accept the return of their nationals.
    • The U.S. can notify the consulate of the individual's home country and request travel documents to facilitate deportation.
  • Domestic Immigration Law:
    • U.S. immigration laws authorize the deportation of individuals unlawfully present or otherwise removable.
    • Deportation requires the receiving country's cooperation to issue necessary travel documents, such as passports or emergency travel certificates.

2. Challenges in Enforcing Returns

  • Non-Cooperation by Receiving Countries:
    • Some nations delay or refuse to accept deportees, citing issues like lack of proper identification, disputed citizenship, or political reasons.
    • For example, countries like China have historically been less cooperative in accepting deportees.
  • Stateless Individuals:
    • Deportation becomes more complicated if the individual cannot be definitively linked to a country of citizenship.

3. U.S. Actions to Encourage Compliance

The U.S. employs several strategies to encourage other nations to cooperate with deportations:
  • Visa Sanctions:
    • Under Section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the U.S. can suspend the issuance of visas to citizens of countries that refuse or unreasonably delay accepting deportees.
    • In 2017, the U.S. imposed visa sanctions on countries like Eritrea, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Cambodia for non-cooperation.
  • Diplomatic Pressure:
    • The U.S. engages in bilateral negotiations to encourage compliance, sometimes offering foreign aid or other concessions in exchange for cooperation.
  • Repatriation Agreements:
    • The U.S. enters into formal agreements with some countries to streamline the deportation process, including timelines and procedures for issuing travel documents.

4. Human Rights Considerations

  • Non-Refoulement Principle:
    • International law prohibits deporting individuals to countries where they would face persecution, torture, or other inhumane treatment.
    • This principle is codified in U.S. law under the Refugee Act of 1980.
  • Asylum and Due Process:
    • Individuals have the right to apply for asylum or other relief from deportation, which can delay or prevent removal.

5. Enforcement Challenges

  • Immigration Detention Limits:
    • If a country refuses to accept its citizen, the U.S. may not be able to detain the individual indefinitely.
    • The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) established that immigrants cannot be detained beyond a presumptively reasonable period (six months) if deportation is not reasonably foreseeable.

Conclusion

While the United States has legal and diplomatic tools to encourage countries to accept their citizens, it cannot compel compliance. Success often depends on the willingness of the receiving nation, international agreements, and geopolitical factors. When countries refuse to cooperate, deportation efforts can be delayed or halted, highlighting the complex interplay of law, diplomacy, and international relations in immigration enforcement.
Sources
Favicon

Nawww, it'll be easy.

diplein-humor.gif
 
It is clear that you've never lived anywhere near the US southern border. People are returned to Mexico on a daily basis, many immediately after illegally entering the country and many more from border checkpoints located within 100 miles of the US border. Mexico doesn't have any say. They came from there and they are returned there. This has been happening daily for at least sixty years that I am personally aware of. I have witnessed the returns of many.

That's because we have agreements with Mexico to return their citizens.

But Mexican's aren't really the problem at this point, it's people from other countries.
 
Welp, for any who can't be deported...they're gonna be sitting in a detention camp for many MANY MANY years!

I hope they like gruel!
 

Forum List

Back
Top