PubliusInfinitum
Rookie
- Aug 18, 2008
- 6,805
- 729
- 0
- Banned
- #81
How's about taking what he said in context
What IS the context?
Why do we need a civilian national security force to secure our national security objectives?
What's opposition would this Civilian force face? Who are these people, SPECIFICALLY, that represent the need for Civilian National Security Force, that is as well funded as the US Military?
The Constitution represents the critical need for the 'militia'... but such is not funded, nor trained by the US Federal Government... such is the citizenry; armed and ready... and those who THAT MILITIA OPPOSE are the those who represent the enemy of the US... and the principles on which she rests.
Now you've implied that Hussein's call for such a FUNDED CIVILIAN SECURITY FORCE rests in reason... What reason IS THAT... identify the CONTEXT wherein this notion; that stands antithetical to the founding principles of the US and her Constitution... rests within sound reason.
Serious question...
Would it even matter to you if I did provide the context?
Well, I've heard the speech in it's entirety... and I've read the transcript... So I'm familiar with the rationalization advanced... now that you found that drivel compelling, tells me that the problem is one wherein you simply fail to recognize the immutable principles on which American liberties rests.
Now obviously from my perspective I do not see a context wherein a cult personality funds a civilian Army, trained to disperse and enforce Left-think propaganda, can serve American interests.
I SPECIFICALLY asked you to advance the context from your perspective... so we could compare and contrast our respective perspectives in open debate; 'will it matter?' is a conclusion that can't truly be known until you BRING IT!
So... please... Emma bring your perspective, wherein you justify a paid 'Civilian Security Force'... I want to hear what you feel justifies this sort of thing, in a nation where the US Constitution guarantees the freedom of political expression... the goal of which is nothing less than to popularize Left-think and organize the funded popularity of same against those who FREELY CONTEST IT.