Say, it was about language over comments you made. It was not to be taken as any kind of insult. Simply a question.Why is it so many (you in this case) want to make a reply about the person who made a point as opposed to addressing the point?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Say, it was about language over comments you made. It was not to be taken as any kind of insult. Simply a question.Why is it so many (you in this case) want to make a reply about the person who made a point as opposed to addressing the point?
So he is going to crash the economy to get them to leave?
Has he actually backed off? Putting Homan in charge is a good sign Trump is very serious.It actually has to be done to be successful. Trump has already backed off from saying this will be done.
For the record, I have already run into workers whose language is Spanish. Working to deliver meals to me, from DoorDash. I Am not guessing. They say they don't speak English.One showed a message to customers that he does not speak English. Does it worry you that you think they will stay here in this country?Why is it so many (you in this case) want to make a reply about the person who made a point as opposed to addressing the point?
It actually has to be done to be successful. Trump has already backed off from saying this will be done.
There better be… because the other option is that we start hunting them down ourselves, and that’s going to be a messy situation.There will be no mass deportation operation.
Manafort, Salazar, Brazos, Sazz.Criminal coddling is Lib 101
I have two times rode a NY City Subway. First let me talk about in 1962. They were filthy. They were deliberately made filthy by persons who did not ride them at all. How could they be so filthy if the person making them filthy cared?I would recommend that Rep. Delia Ramirez, take a ride on the NYC subway system, let's say, the F train at the Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue station in Brooklyn, and take a nap in her seat.
First order of business should be LOCK THEM UP, then carry on with the deportation process.I like this guy. He points out the federal statutes she would be violating and then says “game on”.
Day by day, it's becoming more and more apparent that Tom Homan is the right man to serve as President-elect (Acting President) Donald Trump's border czar. He is forceful, he is focused, he will not be swayed or dissuaded - and he doesn't suffer fools lightly. In the latest demonstration of these qualities, a Congresswoman from Illinois, Rep. Delia Ramirez, warned Homan that he had better be ready for resistance.
Incoming border czar Tom Homan is not backing down from his plans to lead President-elect Trump’s mass deportation operation in Chicago after a Democratic congresswoman told him to "be ready to meet the resistance."
"Message received. Please review 18 USC 111 and also see 8 USC 1324 (iii)," Homan told Fox News Digital in an interview on Wednesday. "Game on."
He was referring to two laws, one prohibiting impeding a federal law enforcement officer and the other prohibiting the harboring or concealing of illegal immigrants from immigration officers.
"So, message received, please review this statute and that statute and game on," he said.
This is the message that Tom "The Hammer" Homan (Yes, I think I will start calling him that; it fits) replied to:
Yeah, good luck with that, Congresswoman.
The laws he mentions have to do with interfering with federal officers in the discharge of their duties. 18 USC 111 involves "Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees" while 8 USC 1324 (iii) deals with "...knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation."