Trump Could Regret His Lawsuit Over Mar-a-Lago Raid

They are trying to imprison Trump and some have said he should be extinguished. Democrats are pathetic.
 
Aaand?

Did Bill Clinton lie about returning everything? Refuse to cooperate with the authorities and return the documents? Did he brazenly obstruct investigation?

Are you seriously too dumb to understand the big difference?
Who the fuck cares. Bill Clinton's case proved beyond doubt that president's can't steal documents.

You rubes fall for every lie.
 
Who the fuck cares. Bill Clinton's case proved beyond doubt that president's can't steal documents.

You rubes fall for every lie.
No it didn't dummy. Presidents, when they become civilians are OF COURSE perfectly capable of stealing shit that doesn't belong to them. Duh.

NA asked Trump for national documents for a year and he sent them a notarized note saying everything was returned. He then obstructs FBI investigation into the matter by moving documents around and trying to erase video tapes of it...and you are saying thats not stealing...WELL WHAT THE FUCK IS IT, IF IT'S NOT STEALING?
 
Last edited:
How did it prove it dummy?

NA asked Trump for national documents for a year and he sent them a notarized note saying everything was returned. He then obstructs FBI investigation into the matter by moving documents around and trying to erase video tapes of it...and you are saying thats not stealing...WELL WHAT THE FUCK IS IT if NOT stealing?
The DOJ took Clinton to court for the same bullshit jack Smith did.

And LOST.

Learn some history.
 
The DOJ took Clinton to court for the same bullshit jack Smith did.

And LOST.

Learn some history.
No they didn't take Clinton "for the same bullshit".

You are full of stupid misinformation as usual.

I don't know who constantly shits all this garbage into your head, but it's time to reconsider where you get your info.
 
No they didn't take Clinton "for the same bullshit".

You are full of stupid misinformation as usual.

I don't know who constantly shits all this garbage into your head, but it's time to reconsider where you get your info.
Yeah, they did. Smith just used different words.
 
Yeah, they did. Smith just used different words.

Ok here are the words in Trump's indictment:


31 counts of retaining and failing to deliver national defense documents under the Espionage Act.

Can you show me "different words" that meant same thing in Clinton's indictment.
 
Ok here are the words in Trump's indictment:


31 counts of retaining and failing to deliver national defense documents under the Espionage Act.

Can you show me "different words" that meant same thing in Clinton's indictment.
Yeah, all bullshit, all the time, based on the Clinton ruling.
 
So you still haven't figured out why Trump was charged, and biden and pence were not?

Do you need someone to explain this to you?
/—-/ Hey DUMMY, Pence and Biden had no legal authority to take the documents or declassify them - DUMMY. What do you not understand?
 
Last edited:
/—-/ Hey DUMMY, Pence and Biden had no legal authority to take the documents or declassify them - DUMMY. What do you not understand?
And both got the benefit of the doubt, as far as their intent.

That's what cooperating gets you.

Fat orange rapists who decide instead to steal and keep the documents and lie to investigators and make false court filings get prosecuted.

It's not complicated.

Got it?
 
And both got the benefit of the doubt, as far as their intent.

That's what cooperating gets you.

Fat orange rapists who decide instead to steal and keep the documents and lie to investigators and make false court filings get prosecuted.

It's not complicated.

Got it?
/---/ That's bullshyt. But, you go ahead and rob a bank. If caught, agree to return the money. See where that gets you.
 
Which part? Be specific.

Because, in this reality, every word I said was a fact.

Just because you are complaining about the facts does not make them "not facts".
/—-/ Specifically this part is bullshyt. “Fat orange rapists who decide instead to steal and keep the documents and lie to investigators and make false court filings get prosecuted”
 
Yup and pleading the fifth in civil court isn't the same as criminal court. In criminal Court, the prosecution isn't allowed to imply guilt because someone plead the fifth. But in civil court, they can and do infer that some who pleads the fifth does so because they have something to hide and the judhe/jury is allowed to take that into consideration.
 

Forum List

Back
Top