Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who the fuck cares. Bill Clinton's case proved beyond doubt that president's can't steal documents.Aaand?
Did Bill Clinton lie about returning everything? Refuse to cooperate with the authorities and return the documents? Did he brazenly obstruct investigation?
Are you seriously too dumb to understand the big difference?
No it didn't dummy. Presidents, when they become civilians are OF COURSE perfectly capable of stealing shit that doesn't belong to them. Duh.Who the fuck cares. Bill Clinton's case proved beyond doubt that president's can't steal documents.
You rubes fall for every lie.
The DOJ took Clinton to court for the same bullshit jack Smith did.How did it prove it dummy?
NA asked Trump for national documents for a year and he sent them a notarized note saying everything was returned. He then obstructs FBI investigation into the matter by moving documents around and trying to erase video tapes of it...and you are saying thats not stealing...WELL WHAT THE FUCK IS IT if NOT stealing?
No they didn't take Clinton "for the same bullshit".The DOJ took Clinton to court for the same bullshit jack Smith did.
And LOST.
Learn some history.
Yeah, they did. Smith just used different words.No they didn't take Clinton "for the same bullshit".
You are full of stupid misinformation as usual.
I don't know who constantly shits all this garbage into your head, but it's time to reconsider where you get your info.
So you still haven't figured out why Trump was charged, and biden and pence were not?/—-/ Biden had no right to classified documents at his home. If you rob a bank then when caught, return the money, do you think that is the end of it?
Yeah, they did. Smith just used different words.
Yeah, all bullshit, all the time, based on the Clinton ruling.Ok here are the words in Trump's indictment:
Loading…
web.archive.org
31 counts of retaining and failing to deliver national defense documents under the Espionage Act.
Can you show me "different words" that meant same thing in Clinton's indictment.
/—-/ Hey DUMMY, Pence and Biden had no legal authority to take the documents or declassify them - DUMMY. What do you not understand?So you still haven't figured out why Trump was charged, and biden and pence were not?
Do you need someone to explain this to you?
You should fix that. They had NO legal authority./—-/ Hey DUMMY, Pence and Biden had to legal authority to take the documents or declassify them - DUMMY. What do you not understand?
/----/ Just did. Thanks.You should fix that. They had NO legal authority.
Trump did.
And both got the benefit of the doubt, as far as their intent./—-/ Hey DUMMY, Pence and Biden had no legal authority to take the documents or declassify them - DUMMY. What do you not understand?
Lie.You should fix that. They had NO legal authority.
Trump did.
/---/ That's bullshyt. But, you go ahead and rob a bank. If caught, agree to return the money. See where that gets you.And both got the benefit of the doubt, as far as their intent.
That's what cooperating gets you.
Fat orange rapists who decide instead to steal and keep the documents and lie to investigators and make false court filings get prosecuted.
It's not complicated.
Got it?
Which part? Be specific.That's bullshyt.
/—-/ Specifically this part is bullshyt. “Fat orange rapists who decide instead to steal and keep the documents and lie to investigators and make false court filings get prosecuted”Which part? Be specific.
Because, in this reality, every word I said was a fact.
Just because you are complaining about the facts does not make them "not facts".
Uh, better step outside and check./—-/ Specifically this part is bullshyt. “Fat orange rapists who decide instead to steal and keep the documents and lie to investigators and make false court filings get prosecuted”
/—-/ TDS facts.Uh, better step outside and check.
That's a fact.