DBA
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2015
- 14,723
- 13,191
- 2,290
You are not educated enough to make any judgments on climate science. I promise.
And you are? Let me give you a little insight as to how this works.
I am in a technical field. If myself along with a few like minded colleagues were told that we needed to release a highly technical report to present to non-technical people to persuade them to believe x or y, do you think we could do so? Do you think we could talk over the non-technical group’s heads to come to virtually any conclusion we wanted? If our non-technical audience wholeheartedly trusted us, we could get away with saying virtually anything. Who is educated enough on the subject matter to scrutinize us if we are all on board? If a technical colleague stepped out of line and questioned us, we would squash them by saying they are obviously wrong since they are in the minority and make them seem as if they don’t know what they are talking about.
Scientists are people too and not immune to indoctrination and partisanship and they like money as much as the next guy. If fairness, I don’t think all scientists fall into this category, however, the damage has already been done. Once a few initial false premises are agreed upon, most of the community proceeds from that point on and doesn’t revisit what are perceived and accepted as well vetted theories. If the foundation is unstable, it doesn’t matter how well constructed the remainder of the building.