Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are we going to talk about Barry now?
If you'd like to.
Not especially. He’s not the president. He didn’t lie about any of those strikes like your asshole has.
Next dodge....
Of course you wouldnt.....dont blame you.
And what lies did Trump tell about the drone strike?
He lied about the reason he did it. He’s still lying. That’s the whole problem. He’s lying to you. You don’t care.
Well than surely you can prove your assertions.
Right?
He can hold the event elsewhere anytime he wants to.
Absolutely. He can take a shit and call it the “State of the Union” if he wants to. Not the point of the question. Idiot.
Then what exactly is your point?
Trump doesnt need congress's approval to give the SOTU speech or exact limited strikes against or enemies
He needs congressional approval to deliver it in the chamber. Fool. That’s the entire point.
And why must moron Trombies always try to filibuster by changing the subject like you just did.
Trump has the authority to exact limited strikes on enemies. In fact, in a time of war, he’s not limited.
But killing a high ranking military official/political leader of a sovereign nation with which we are NOT at war requires a few things. One is congressional notification. Another is a demonstration that the killing is a self defense measure. The idiot claimed the latter. But he’s been proven to be lying about that claim. He’s a fucking liar. He lied directly to the American people. Again.
And....don’t beat your dogs.
I think you're going to have to prove that one, and don't forget to take the AUMF into consideration....Thanks.
International law, doofus.
If you'd like to.
Not especially. He’s not the president. He didn’t lie about any of those strikes like your asshole has.
Next dodge....
Of course you wouldnt.....dont blame you.
And what lies did Trump tell about the drone strike?
He lied about the reason he did it. He’s still lying. That’s the whole problem. He’s lying to you. You don’t care.
Well than surely you can prove your assertions.
Right?
Absolutely. It’s clear. He has lied about it since the day it happened. There was no imminent attack. That’s a lie. Period.
Any honest person will tell you the same thing. I’m not going to waste the time with you though. You are far too dishonest.
Absolutely. He can take a shit and call it the “State of the Union” if he wants to. Not the point of the question. Idiot.
Then what exactly is your point?
Trump doesnt need congress's approval to give the SOTU speech or exact limited strikes against or enemies
He needs congressional approval to deliver it in the chamber. Fool. That’s the entire point.
And why must moron Trombies always try to filibuster by changing the subject like you just did.
Trump has the authority to exact limited strikes on enemies. In fact, in a time of war, he’s not limited.
But killing a high ranking military official/political leader of a sovereign nation with which we are NOT at war requires a few things. One is congressional notification. Another is a demonstration that the killing is a self defense measure. The idiot claimed the latter. But he’s been proven to be lying about that claim. He’s a fucking liar. He lied directly to the American people. Again.
And....don’t beat your dogs.
I think you're going to have to prove that one, and don't forget to take the AUMF into consideration....Thanks.
International law, doofus.
We are governed by the laws of the United States...Not an international body...So, I'll take that as you can't provide evidence for your emotional blather you typed.
Then what exactly is your point?
Trump doesnt need congress's approval to give the SOTU speech or exact limited strikes against or enemies
He needs congressional approval to deliver it in the chamber. Fool. That’s the entire point.
And why must moron Trombies always try to filibuster by changing the subject like you just did.
Trump has the authority to exact limited strikes on enemies. In fact, in a time of war, he’s not limited.
But killing a high ranking military official/political leader of a sovereign nation with which we are NOT at war requires a few things. One is congressional notification. Another is a demonstration that the killing is a self defense measure. The idiot claimed the latter. But he’s been proven to be lying about that claim. He’s a fucking liar. He lied directly to the American people. Again.
And....don’t beat your dogs.
I think you're going to have to prove that one, and don't forget to take the AUMF into consideration....Thanks.
International law, doofus.
We are governed by the laws of the United States...Not an international body...So, I'll take that as you can't provide evidence for your emotional blather you typed.
I know that you do not honor the international legal framework that we helped create and that we are signatories to. You’re a Trump supporter. You have no honor.
He needs congressional approval to deliver it in the chamber. Fool. That’s the entire point.
And why must moron Trombies always try to filibuster by changing the subject like you just did.
Trump has the authority to exact limited strikes on enemies. In fact, in a time of war, he’s not limited.
But killing a high ranking military official/political leader of a sovereign nation with which we are NOT at war requires a few things. One is congressional notification. Another is a demonstration that the killing is a self defense measure. The idiot claimed the latter. But he’s been proven to be lying about that claim. He’s a fucking liar. He lied directly to the American people. Again.
And....don’t beat your dogs.
I think you're going to have to prove that one, and don't forget to take the AUMF into consideration....Thanks.
International law, doofus.
We are governed by the laws of the United States...Not an international body...So, I'll take that as you can't provide evidence for your emotional blather you typed.
I know that you do not honor the international legal framework that we helped create and that we are signatories to. You’re a Trump supporter. You have no honor.
You don't like me? I'm so hurt....pfft.
Nothing burger. Only person that seems to care is you. It has zero impact on my life.*
* impeached.
#me too. The Trump Administration has much to do with the lives of many, and if you had kids you too would be worried about the outcome of the trial.
Why would I, if I had kids, be worried about the the outcome of the trial?
Their future. Regulations may be burdensome but government handcuffed will allow the private sector to continue to foul our land, water and air; putting profit before people as we saw recently with the Vaping Industry which trump has allowed to continue, his promise to fix the opiate crisis and do nothing to end it and siding with the NRA which allowed over 3,000 children to die from a gun in 2016; and his so far failed efforts to repeal and replace health care in America.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsr1804754
If the Senate decided to convict Trump, then Pence would become President and the Republican party would be out in force and defeat the Democratic front runner. So the trial in my opinion would not help you in any way shape or form.
The vaping industry is a result of big tobacco wanting to get rid of a new rival industry and it worked. You have vaping deaths, not by legit vaping companies but from cheap illegal knockoffs. You make vaping illegal it would allow illegal companies to sell their products and as a result see more deaths. Cigarettes also carries several deadly toxins that vapes don't carry. I am against inhaling tobacco into your system whether it is by cigarettes or vaping, however vaping is is no worse and evidence show it is better than smoking cigarettes.
Nothing burger. Only person that seems to care is you. It has zero impact on my life.
#me too. The Trump Administration has much to do with the lives of many, and if you had kids you too would be worried about the outcome of the trial.
Why would I, if I had kids, be worried about the the outcome of the trial?
Their future. Regulations may be burdensome but government handcuffed will allow the private sector to continue to foul our land, water and air; putting profit before people as we saw recently with the Vaping Industry which trump has allowed to continue, his promise to fix the opiate crisis and do nothing to end it and siding with the NRA which allowed over 3,000 children to die from a gun in 2016; and his so far failed efforts to repeal and replace health care in America.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsr1804754
If the Senate decided to convict Trump, then Pence would become President and the Republican party would be out in force and defeat the Democratic front runner. So the trial in my opinion would not help you in any way shape or form.
The vaping industry is a result of big tobacco wanting to get rid of a new rival industry and it worked. You have vaping deaths, not by legit vaping companies but from cheap illegal knockoffs. You make vaping illegal it would allow illegal companies to sell their products and as a result see more deaths. Cigarettes also carries several deadly toxins that vapes don't carry. I am against inhaling tobacco into your system whether it is by cigarettes or vaping, however vaping is is no worse and evidence show it is better than smoking cigarettes.
You miss the point entirely. I agree, at my age (72) the guys I knew who smoked tobacco began to die of cancer and/or heart disease at age 50. Vaping has caused the death of teenagers, and trump once supported the prohibition of vaping, until the vaping companies got to him. He then flipped.
Trump's behavior has continued go make our nation and its citizens less safe by every EO, tweet, policy and rally.
Trump is not the reason he is the result.Nothing burger. Only person that seems to care is you. It has zero impact on my life.
#me too. The Trump Administration has much to do with the lives of many, and if you had kids you too would be worried about the outcome of the trial.
Why would I, if I had kids, be worried about the the outcome of the trial?
Their future. Regulations may be burdensome but government handcuffed will allow the private sector to continue to foul our land, water and air; putting profit before people as we saw recently with the Vaping Industry which trump has allowed to continue, his promise to fix the opiate crisis and do nothing to end it and siding with the NRA which allowed over 3,000 children to die from a gun in 2016; and his so far failed efforts to repeal and replace health care in America.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsr1804754
If the Senate decided to convict Trump, then Pence would become President and the Republican party would be out in force and defeat the Democratic front runner. So the trial in my opinion would not help you in any way shape or form.
The vaping industry is a result of big tobacco wanting to get rid of a new rival industry and it worked. You have vaping deaths, not by legit vaping companies but from cheap illegal knockoffs. You make vaping illegal it would allow illegal companies to sell their products and as a result see more deaths. Cigarettes also carries several deadly toxins that vapes don't carry. I am against inhaling tobacco into your system whether it is by cigarettes or vaping, however vaping is is no worse and evidence show it is better than smoking cigarettes.
You miss the point entirely. I agree, at my age (72) the guys I knew who smoked tobacco began to die of cancer and/or heart disease at age 50. Vaping has caused the death of teenagers, and trump once supported the prohibition of vaping, until the vaping companies got to him. He then flipped.
Trump's behavior has continued go make our nation and its citizens less safe by every EO, tweet, policy and rally.
#me too. The Trump Administration has much to do with the lives of many, and if you had kids you too would be worried about the outcome of the trial.
Why would I, if I had kids, be worried about the the outcome of the trial?
Their future. Regulations may be burdensome but government handcuffed will allow the private sector to continue to foul our land, water and air; putting profit before people as we saw recently with the Vaping Industry which trump has allowed to continue, his promise to fix the opiate crisis and do nothing to end it and siding with the NRA which allowed over 3,000 children to die from a gun in 2016; and his so far failed efforts to repeal and replace health care in America.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsr1804754
If the Senate decided to convict Trump, then Pence would become President and the Republican party would be out in force and defeat the Democratic front runner. So the trial in my opinion would not help you in any way shape or form.
The vaping industry is a result of big tobacco wanting to get rid of a new rival industry and it worked. You have vaping deaths, not by legit vaping companies but from cheap illegal knockoffs. You make vaping illegal it would allow illegal companies to sell their products and as a result see more deaths. Cigarettes also carries several deadly toxins that vapes don't carry. I am against inhaling tobacco into your system whether it is by cigarettes or vaping, however vaping is is no worse and evidence show it is better than smoking cigarettes.
You miss the point entirely. I agree, at my age (72) the guys I knew who smoked tobacco began to die of cancer and/or heart disease at age 50. Vaping has caused the death of teenagers, and trump once supported the prohibition of vaping, until the vaping companies got to him. He then flipped.
Trump's behavior has continued go make our nation and its citizens less safe by every EO, tweet, policy and rally.
Whatever happened to personal responsibility?
Why would I, if I had kids, be worried about the the outcome of the trial?
Their future. Regulations may be burdensome but government handcuffed will allow the private sector to continue to foul our land, water and air; putting profit before people as we saw recently with the Vaping Industry which trump has allowed to continue, his promise to fix the opiate crisis and do nothing to end it and siding with the NRA which allowed over 3,000 children to die from a gun in 2016; and his so far failed efforts to repeal and replace health care in America.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsr1804754
If the Senate decided to convict Trump, then Pence would become President and the Republican party would be out in force and defeat the Democratic front runner. So the trial in my opinion would not help you in any way shape or form.
The vaping industry is a result of big tobacco wanting to get rid of a new rival industry and it worked. You have vaping deaths, not by legit vaping companies but from cheap illegal knockoffs. You make vaping illegal it would allow illegal companies to sell their products and as a result see more deaths. Cigarettes also carries several deadly toxins that vapes don't carry. I am against inhaling tobacco into your system whether it is by cigarettes or vaping, however vaping is is no worse and evidence show it is better than smoking cigarettes.
You miss the point entirely. I agree, at my age (72) the guys I knew who smoked tobacco began to die of cancer and/or heart disease at age 50. Vaping has caused the death of teenagers, and trump once supported the prohibition of vaping, until the vaping companies got to him. He then flipped.
Trump's behavior has continued go make our nation and its citizens less safe by every EO, tweet, policy and rally.
Whatever happened to personal responsibility?
I wouldn't know, that meme was created by the right wing, that's the only certainty.
Nothing burger. Only person that seems to care is you. It has zero impact on my life.
#me too. The Trump Administration has much to do with the lives of many, and if you had kids you too would be worried about the outcome of the trial.
Why would I, if I had kids, be worried about the the outcome of the trial?
Their future. Regulations may be burdensome but government handcuffed will allow the private sector to continue to foul our land, water and air; putting profit before people as we saw recently with the Vaping Industry which trump has allowed to continue, his promise to fix the opiate crisis and do nothing to end it and siding with the NRA which allowed over 3,000 children to die from a gun in 2016; and his so far failed efforts to repeal and replace health care in America.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsr1804754
If the Senate decided to convict Trump, then Pence would become President and the Republican party would be out in force and defeat the Democratic front runner. So the trial in my opinion would not help you in any way shape or form.
The vaping industry is a result of big tobacco wanting to get rid of a new rival industry and it worked. You have vaping deaths, not by legit vaping companies but from cheap illegal knockoffs. You make vaping illegal it would allow illegal companies to sell their products and as a result see more deaths. Cigarettes also carries several deadly toxins that vapes don't carry. I am against inhaling tobacco into your system whether it is by cigarettes or vaping, however vaping is is no worse and evidence show it is better than smoking cigarettes.
You miss the point entirely. I agree, at my age (72) the guys I knew who smoked tobacco began to die of cancer and/or heart disease at age 50. Vaping has caused the death of teenagers, and trump once supported the prohibition of vaping, until the vaping companies got to him. He then flipped.
Trump's behavior has continued go make our nation and its citizens less safe by every EO, tweet, policy and rally.
Define “imminent”If you'd like to.
Not especially. He’s not the president. He didn’t lie about any of those strikes like your asshole has.
Next dodge....
Of course you wouldnt.....dont blame you.
And what lies did Trump tell about the drone strike?
He lied about the reason he did it. He’s still lying. That’s the whole problem. He’s lying to you. You don’t care.
Well than surely you can prove your assertions.
Right?
Absolutely. It’s clear. He has lied about it since the day it happened. There was no imminent attack. That’s a lie. Period.
Any honest person will tell you the same thing. I’m not going to waste the time with you though. You are far too dishonest.
Steve Bannon on Fox Sunday.
Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon joins Sunday Morning Futures to discuss rising support for democracy around the world, the impeachment trial and the annual State of the Union address.
Steve Bannon on Fox Sunday.
Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon joins Sunday Morning Futures to discuss rising support for democracy around the world, the impeachment trial and the annual State of the Union address.
Didn't Nancy extend the invitation and didn't Trump accept? That's kind of a line in the sand....and if he backs out, doesn't he end up looking like the...uh..well, the decisive wimp that he is??
Donald Trump agrees to deliver State of the Union on February 4 - CNNPolitics
If only causing concern was a crimeimpeachment is the sole responsibility of the house.
Yet they won't accept and act on that responsibility
Why?
there's nothing that says the articles have to go to the senate in a specific time frame. pelosi never intended on holding them forever. they will be on their way most likely this week. she held onto them for a while for a few good reasons & it came to work in her favor.
They will be on their way this week? How do you know?
How is her holding on to them worked in her favor?
let me correct myself - there is much reporting saying it will be this week & i've seen nothing nor anyone disputing it. her holding them over xmas vacation gave the more reasonable (R)s time to see what their constituents are saying, & give them a reason to think & question about the total blackout of any witness' & hard copy docs. & by the delay, bolton came fwd about testifying if subpoenaed, & the emails showing more proof of the nefarious shenanigans donny engaged in. & now the house may subpoena bolton if the senate doesn't. AND it drove president dotard nuts & his xmas probably sucked. i say that's a pretty good outcome.
Explosive new documents reveal the lengths to which the Justice Department went to conceal the Pentagon's concerns about Trump's Ukraine aid freeze
If only
someone who has nothing to hide is hiding everything.
that's a fact jack. & intelligent people are having a problem with that as they should. you not having any problems at all explains all i need to know aboutyou.
Define “imminent”Not especially. He’s not the president. He didn’t lie about any of those strikes like your asshole has.
Next dodge....
Of course you wouldnt.....dont blame you.
And what lies did Trump tell about the drone strike?
He lied about the reason he did it. He’s still lying. That’s the whole problem. He’s lying to you. You don’t care.
Well than surely you can prove your assertions.
Right?
Absolutely. It’s clear. He has lied about it since the day it happened. There was no imminent attack. That’s a lie. Period.
Any honest person will tell you the same thing. I’m not going to waste the time with you though. You are far too dishonest.
So if he coordinates another 9/11 type attack in August he was not worth killing? You’re such a pussy, Lone Leftist.
Not to mention the people in Iran are thrilled. They hate their dictators. Lone Leftist and his pussy ilk refuse to discuss that. They are more worried about allowing men to pee in ladies rooms.
