Ernie S.
Diamond Member
I'd call it logical.... but that's the point of this line.Your philosophy is quite apparent.And you have a somewhat shady connection to the DNC.Your soundly reasoned, objective rationale for this is....?
He's got a history of questionable scholarly work on guns and gun control, such as claiming to have done "surveys" that there are no record of actually being performed, and even going as far as creating a fictitious alter ego online to support his own work.
He's also got somewhat shady connections to the NRA and gun manufacturers.
My point is, a shady source relaying here say from a private conversation 20 years ago isn't exactly "proof" of Obama's attitudes on guns.
Ya know, Doc, the only thing making your political philosophy any more valid than anyone else's is your imagination.
Actually, the connections I have to the DNC are quite above-board, thank you very much. I've even paid the taxes on it.
Where did I say anything about my political philosophy, or anyone else's? Or was that just a non sequitur?
The point I was trying to make was that yours is no more valid than mine; just different. Be just as judgemental (authoritarian) as you like. It just proves the point of the OP.
Huh?
Being "judgmental" is being "authoritarian"?
Does that mean you're being authoritarian by "judging" what you think my political philosophy to be?