US Court Of International Trade Blocks All Of Trumps Tariffs. All Of Them

[Mac-7]

Norm Eisen

Boo! Hiss! on him

 

[Marener]

Congress has not set a tariff since forever

The executive branch has been doing it for them

NAFTA was voted on in Congress. So was USMCA.

 

[Care4all]

No you're not....You're a dyed-in-the-wool team player.

Well, yeah...that too...as a result...

 

[Delldude]

NAFTA was voted on in Congress. So was USMCA.

Why did Congress delegate authority to the executive?

 

[Delldude]

Boo! Hiss! on him

The architect.

 

[WEATHER53]

Officially ignored

 

[Marener]

Why did Congress delegate authority to the executive?

Looks like to deal with emergencies and national security.

Not for the president to do anything they want anytime for any reason.

 

[Delldude]

Looks like to deal with emergencies and national security.

Not for the president to do anything they want anytime for any reason.

Look again.

Tariff imbalances is one.

 

[bendog]

They are turning America into a kritarchy.

well your avatar is well chosen

 

[WEATHER53]

Now that Trump has declared he is officially ignoring let’s have another robed simp declare the word “ignoring” is unlawful and cannot be expressed

 

[Oddball]

DERP!!!!!

Trump tariffs back on after appeals court slams brakes on trade court’s ban

A federal appeals court put the brakes Thursday on a lower court order that overturned most of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

nypost.com

 

[M14 Shooter]

A full 11-judge panel on the US Court of Appeals for the federal circuit stayed the order by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade while the White House appeal is heard.

Trump tariffs back on after appeals court slams brakes on trade court’s ban

A federal appeals court put the brakes Thursday on a lower court order that overturned most of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

nypost.com

That didn't take long.
The tariffs stand, at least until the appeals court rules.

 

[Care4all]

Congress has not set a tariff since forever

The executive branch has been doing it for them

Congress voted on the last 16 of 17 trade agreements negotiated by presidents.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

A federal court has struck down Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, ruling that the president overstepped his legal authority in imposing them on a broad range of countries, according to media reports.

The U.S. Court of International Trade issued the unanimous decision Wednesday, rejecting Trump’s April 2 tariff order – which he claimed was justified by national emergencies, Politico reported. The court’s ruling, however, found that justification inadequate under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The three-judge panel also ordered that tariffs collected under Trump’s order be “vacated.” The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/trump-tariffs-trade-court-ruling

That includes China. And the US may have to pay all of them back.

It seems like you wet your pants in excitement.

 

[WEATHER53]

A full 11-judge panel on the US Court of Appeals for the federal circuit stayed the order by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade while the White House appeal is heard.

Trump tariffs back on after appeals court slams brakes on trade court’s ban

A federal appeals court put the brakes Thursday on a lower court order that overturned most of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

nypost.com

That didn't take long.
The tariffs stand, at least until the appeals court rules.

And it will be a hearing with multiple judges and presenters rather than one TDS loon judge sipping whiskey by himself alone at home making up edicts

 

[M14 Shooter]

Congress voted on the last 16 of 17 trade agreements negotiated by presidents.

Which is not the same thing.

 

[mudwhistle]

No, the judges are stopping one man from hijacking the USA.

Obama isn't in office anymore.

 

[22lcidw]

NAFTA was voted on in Congress. So was USMCA.

Congress voted on the last 16 of 17 trade agreements negotiated by presidents.

A lot of legislation passed does not worry about the future as the voters worry about the present and the politicians, entertainers and media will never let them forget. The costs of Medicare and Medicaid was supposed to be much much much much much much less than it is today. Of course, just one of the social programs where costs are out of control. And it seems we do not even want to get corruption out of it as we see today.

 

[theHawk]

A federal court has struck down Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, ruling that the president overstepped his legal authority in imposing them on a broad range of countries, according to media reports.

The U.S. Court of International Trade issued the unanimous decision Wednesday, rejecting Trump’s April 2 tariff order – which he claimed was justified by national emergencies, Politico reported. The court’s ruling, however, found that justification inadequate under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The three-judge panel also ordered that tariffs collected under Trump’s order be “vacated.” The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/trump-tariffs-trade-court-ruling

That includes China. And the US may have to pay all of them back.

Oops…

 

[mudwhistle]

Why did Congress delegate authority to the executive?

My guess is they couldn't get anything done on their own. These judges are going to get their ass kicked by a higher court because:

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows the president to enact temporary tariffs to address “large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits” or certain other situations that present "fundamental international payments problems; and Section 338 of Tariff Act of 1930, which authorizes the president to enact “tariffs on articles produced by, or imported on the vessels of, foreign countries that discriminate against U.S. commerce in certain ways,” have not yet been used.


Ultimately, Congress can limit or expand the presidential tariffs powers through legislation, but the CRS concludes that based on precedents dating back to the time of Chief Justice Marshall, judicial precedent “has given the President broad latitude to exercise his tariff authorities.”