Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What war are we in that Trump started?Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.
The one we are starting with Iran. Wars start when you kill people. The bloodiest war over 100 years ago started with a harmless assassination.
Yes we know the far left is wanting a war with Iran now, all because they hate Trump!
I (assuming I'm the far left here) want a war with Iran? How far up your ass did you pull that one out from?
Some wars are necessary.I (assuming I'm the far left here) want a war with Iran? How far up your ass did you pull that one out from?
What war are we in that Trump started?Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.
The one we are starting with Iran. Wars start when you kill people. The bloodiest war over 100 years ago started with a harmless assassination.
Yes we know the far left is wanting a war with Iran now, all because they hate Trump!
I (assuming I'm the far left here) want a war with Iran? How far up your ass did you pull that one out from?
Warren means it, but that's bad for America.Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.
Not if you consider slavery a viable alternative.Some wars are necessary.
War is good for the economy. Plus it gives our military the chance to test new and upgraded weaponry.We spent well over a TRILLION dollars on the last Republican War...
Imagine what that money could have done. Healthcare...infrastructure...college...social security...Medicare.
And here those same Republicans are gearing up to blow another trillion or two...after telling us how broke we are
Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.
It's like Vietnam all over again. The libs can't wait to protest.
<< No war with Iran. De-escalation now.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who is running for president, called the move "reckless" in an initial tweet Thursday night. Friday, she followed up with a series of tweets saying the strike brought the U.S. to "the brink of yet another war in the Middle East—one that would be devastating in terms of lives lost and resources wasted." >>
'No War With Iran': Massachusetts Lawmakers On Soleimani Killing
Let see
Korean war was to stop communism, well it was a draw with American lives lost
Vietnam - a war to stop communism and failed miserable with American lives lost
Iraq war - wrong country to begin with because Bin laden wasn' t their and no weapons of mass destruction
- country then was beat up by a rag tag army called ISIS
- US and the coalition bailed them out
-Afganistan - I guess to attack more terrorist
Russian Communism fails without one shot being fired
just JFK blockade of Cuban to tell the Russians to go back home
China even still communism but now has free enterprise as part of country
no shot being fired
Iran - was killing one man worth it.
Trump boasted that OB would start a war with Iran just to get reelected
yet OB negotiated with them and it is now Trump who would start a war with Iran to get reelected
It can be said that the drone shot was heard around the world
Irony defined is to kill one man to save american lives yet if war is inevitable it didn't save american lives
American the land of the brave or the land of the gullible
Repubs strategy at its best, now that is Ironic
Yet Obama started illegal wars and the far left was silent!
Warren will start more wars, just by doing what Obama did!
Looks like our little Trumper Doves have turned back into hawks.
What a surprise
Wussy libs are horrified that some Muslim mosque in Iran will bite the dust.Looks like our little Trumper Doves have turned back into hawks.
It's like Vietnam all over again. The libs can't wait to protest.
<< No war with Iran. De-escalation now.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who is running for president, called the move "reckless" in an initial tweet Thursday night. Friday, she followed up with a series of tweets saying the strike brought the U.S. to "the brink of yet another war in the Middle East—one that would be devastating in terms of lives lost and resources wasted." >>
'No War With Iran': Massachusetts Lawmakers On Soleimani Killing
Let see
Korean war was to stop communism, well it was a draw with American lives lost
Vietnam - a war to stop communism and failed miserable with American lives lost
Iraq war - wrong country to begin with because Bin laden wasn' t their and no weapons of mass destruction
- country then was beat up by a rag tag army called ISIS
- US and the coalition bailed them out
-Afganistan - I guess to attack more terrorist
Russian Communism fails without one shot being fired
just JFK blockade of Cuban to tell the Russians to go back home
China even still communism but now has free enterprise as part of country
no shot being fired
Iran - was killing one man worth it.
Trump boasted that OB would start a war with Iran just to get reelected
yet OB negotiated with them and it is now Trump who would start a war with Iran to get reelected
It can be said that the drone shot was heard around the world
Irony defined is to kill one man to save american lives yet if war is inevitable it didn't save american lives
American the land of the brave or the land of the gullible
Repubs strategy at its best, now that is Ironic
Are you on an LSD trip?
You have no grasp of history at all. You think the USSR fell because of JFK's blockade of Cuba?
If you shoot second you might end up getting shot.JFK could have shot first and asked questions later but instead he used a blockade and they went home without a shot being fired
The other point was that USSR fell without a shot being fired
So is it necessary to fire a shot to win?
the other scenarios NK, Vietnam, and Iraq was shot first and ask questions later
What war are we in that Trump started?Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.
The one we are starting with Iran. Wars start when you kill people. The bloodiest war over 100 years ago started with a harmless assassination.
War is good for the economy. Plus it gives our military the chance to test new and upgraded weaponry.
If you shoot second you might end up getting shot.JFK could have shot first and asked questions later but instead he used a blockade and they went home without a shot being fired
The other point was that USSR fell without a shot being fired
So is it necessary to fire a shot to win?
the other scenarios NK, Vietnam, and Iraq was shot first and ask questions later
Trump's shoot first strategy is the right one.
What war are we in that Trump started?Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.
The one we are starting with Iran. Wars start when you kill people. The bloodiest war over 100 years ago started with a harmless assassination.
Well, it wasn't that harmless to the Archduke and his wife, Sophie...… I assume you are referring to WWI.
Warren is a worthless commie. And a chronic pathological liar. Fauxcahontas!
