Washington Post refuses to endorse Kamala…what a bombshell!

It is actually not that shocking.

The OP's link was enlightening on why the Washington Post decided not to endorse a presidential candidate.

First and foremost, the WP is owned by Jeff Bezos. Bezos has substantial interests tied to the federal government, so it makes sense that he would not want to get involved with an endorsement, but more on that in a moment.

Second, the WP is moving to the right. Will Lewis the new publisher and CEO, was hired for his conservative credentials.

Now, as far as Bezos is concerned, I don't think anyone should be cheering this new reality regarding the WP. All it evidences is that the day of the independent newspaper is gone and now the mega-rich control the flow of news from those sources, and may endorse only those that will be in their best business interests.

So, the OP can jump with glee over the fact that the WP will not endorse Kamala, but it bodes for a future where independent editorial boards are as extinct as the rotary phone.
Are you about to puke after that SPIN? 🤡

You are a fucking clown. It is no surprise that WAPO is not endorsing a “BLACK” FEMALE DEM FOR POTUS. :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:

Bark and clap, trained seal. You are fucking brainwashed.
 
It is actually not that shocking.

The OP's link was enlightening on why the Washington Post decided not to endorse a presidential candidate.

First and foremost, the WP is owned by Jeff Bezos. Bezos has substantial interests tied to the federal government, so it makes sense that he would not want to get involved with an endorsement, but more on that in a moment.

Second, the WP is moving to the right. Will Lewis the new publisher and CEO, was hired for his conservative credentials.

Now, as far as Bezos is concerned, I don't think anyone should be cheering this new reality regarding the WP. All it evidences is that the day of the independent newspaper is gone and now the mega-rich control the flow of news from those sources, and may endorse only those that will be in their best business interests.

So, the OP can jump with glee over the fact that the WP will not endorse Kamala, but it bodes for a future where independent editorial boards are as extinct as the rotary phone.
I wish they would all just stay the fk out of politics, along with Hollywood
 
Are you about to puke after that SPIN? 🤡

You are a fucking clown. It is no surprise that WAPO is not endorsing a “BLACK” FEMALE DEM FOR POTUS. :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:

Bark and clap, trained seal. You are fucking brainwashed.
You know you probably are one of those people that fly off the deep end in any political conversation. I bet people in a political conversation yes you to death. That you can't respond in a civilized manner makes discourse impossible.
 
I wish they would all just stay the fk out of politics, along with Hollywood
I have a feeling you did not comprehend my post at all. It was based on the OP's own link. Sad!
 
You know you probably are one of those people that fly off the deep end in any political conversation. I bet people in a political conversation yes you to death. That you can't respond in a civilized manner makes discourse impossible.

Dr. Quest is vomiting and Race Barron is going to kick your ass.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JLW
So BEZOS is now a TRUMPTARD….WOW.

WHO KNEW?

WAPO ENDORSED BIDEN. KAMALA SAID SHE WOULD CHANGE NOTHING BUT SHE IS AN AGENT OF CHANGE. :banana: :banana:
 
First and foremost, the WP is owned by Jeff Bezos. Bezos has substantial interests tied to the federal government, so it makes sense that he would not want to get involved with an endorsement, but more on that in a moment.
Uh, they/he endorsed Demented Joe Biden.
 
So, the OP can jump with glee over the fact that the WP will not endorse Kamala, but it bodes for a future where independent editorial boards are as extinct as the rotary phone.
How can papers like the WP be informative and then campaign for candidates?
We know how the media changed to Democratic over time. And they run most of the press. It is shitty that the press works for Democrats.
 
How can papers like the WP be informative and then campaign for candidates?
We know how the media changed to Democratic over time. And they run most of the press. It is shitty that the press works for Democrats.
What you meant to say, how do they show they are fair in their content if they are bought by a party. I listened to the Union's president and he stated his union gave so much to the demofks and didn't get anything back, is that the expectation from these fkwads? Do they understand they state they are rewarded financially or somehow for their money. If that isn't a lobbyist pay to play/ quid pro quo, don't know what else is.
 

Forum List

Back
Top