We need to get our heads out of our asses and stop this.

[The Irish Ram]

What this man is telling you is correct. We have to start listening to common sense, and get the politicians out of our pockets. They are harming our earth, not helping it.

 

[shockedcanadian]

What this man is telling you is correct. We have to start listening to common sense, and get the politicians out of our pockets. They are harming our earth, not helping it.

China and the MSS played the West and politicians who saw green at the expense of their nations economy and national security were all too willing to go all in without considering the broader consequences.

 

[IM2]

Tell that to the hurricane victims.

 

[initforme]

Businesses aren't damaged by anything.

 

[Marener]

What this man is telling you is correct. We have to start listening to common sense, and get the politicians out of our pockets. They are harming our earth, not helping it.

If I handed you a bottle of water and said it’s only 0.04% arsenic, would you drink it?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

All part of the globull warming wealth redistribution scam

 

[SassyIrishLass]

If I handed you a bottle of water and said it’s only 0.04% arsenic, would you drink it?

That's one lousy analogy even for you

 

[The Duke]

If I handed you a bottle of water and said it’s only 0.04% arsenic, would you drink it?

Carbon Dioxide is an inert gas while Arsenic is highly toxic.
They are not the same. We are not the same.

 

[The Irish Ram]

If I handed you a bottle of water and said it’s only 0.04% arsenic, would you drink it?

Look at that number. 0.04%. If you get rid of the .04%, you get rid of humanity. 0.04 is the CO2 level plant life needs to ingest and release oxygen in return.
If you are concerned about our climate, something Gate's is doing to the atmosphere to block out the sun is poisoning the air we breathe. You could make that your cause.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If I handed you a bottle of water and said it’s only 0.04% arsenic, would you drink it?

If not for co2, you and every other living thing on this planet would die.

 

[Marener]

That's one lousy analogy even for you

But it’s only 0.04%. What’s the matter? That’s too low to affect anything, right?

 

[Marener]

If not for co2, you and every other living thing on this planet would die.

Great. So let’s make the atmosphere 100% CO2 then.

 

[Marener]

Look at that number. 0.04%. If you get rid of the .04%, you get rid of humanity. 0.04 is the CO2 level plant life needs to ingest and release oxygen in return.
If you are concerned about our climate, something Gate's is doing to the atmosphere to block out the sun is poisoning the air we breathe. You could make that your cause.

No one is suggesting we get rid of the 0.04%.

Why didn’t all the plants die 200 years ago when it was 0.027%

 

[para bellum]

What this man is telling you is correct. We have to start listening to common sense, and get the politicians out of our pockets. They are harming our earth, not helping it.

You must never question the magic thermostat...

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Great. So let’s make the atmosphere 100% CO2 then.

You can't poss8bly be this ignorant. Or, maybe you can.

 

[initforme]

I'm not too worried about business. They have it pretty nice and easy.

 

[Marener]

You can't poss8bly be this ignorant. Or, maybe you can.

But you said CO2 is so amazing! Obviously we should want more of it, right?

Or are you admitting too much CO2 is bad?

 

[Concerned American]

If I handed you a bottle of water and said it’s only 0.04% arsenic, would you drink it?

LMAO, it is quite possible you've done exactly that if you are over 30. Until 2001, the standard was 50 ppb. which is about 0.05%. The standard was replaced in 2001 to 0.01% or about 10 ppb.
On January 22, 2001, EPA adopted a new standard for arsenic in drinking water of 0.01 mg/l or 10 parts per billion (ppb), replacing the old standard of 50 ppb. Water systems had to meet the new standard by January 23, 2006.

Drinking Water Arsenic Rule History | US EPA

The EPA published the final arsenic rule on January 22, 2001. In response to the national debate surrounding the arsenic rule related to science and costs, the EPA announced on March 20, 2001 that the agency would reassess the science and cost issues.

www.epa.gov

 

[SassyIrishLass]

But it’s only 0.04%. What’s the matter? That’s too low to affect anything, right?

You're ignorant

 

[Marener]

LMAO, it is quite possible you've done exactly that if you are over 30. Until 2001, the standard was 50 ppb. which is about 0.05%. The standard was replaced in 2001 to 0.01% or about 10 ppb.
On January 22, 2001, EPA adopted a new standard for arsenic in drinking water of 0.01 mg/l or 10 parts per billion (ppb), replacing the old standard of 50 ppb. Water systems had to meet the new standard by January 23, 2006.

Drinking Water Arsenic Rule History | US EPA

The EPA published the final arsenic rule on January 22, 2001. In response to the national debate surrounding the arsenic rule related to science and costs, the EPA announced on March 20, 2001 that the agency would reassess the science and cost issues.

www.epa.gov

You’re off by three orders of magnitude.

50 ppb is 0.00005%

50 ppm is 0.05%.