bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,161
- 47,305
Wrong, turd. It's done all the time. Some are legal, and some aren't.Providing a tax free benefit in lieu of taxable salary is illegal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong, turd. It's done all the time. Some are legal, and some aren't.Providing a tax free benefit in lieu of taxable salary is illegal.
When it comes to housing, it’s always illegal.Wrong, turd. It's done all the time. Some are legal, and some aren't.
Nope.When it comes to housing, it’s always illegal.
If it’s done all the time, then they need to start prosecuting it. That’ll stop it.
Yep. If you are willing to pay people money if they do take the corporate housing, then it is automatically a taxable benefit.Nope.
Wrong again. If the housing is not their primary residence and is located near the customer, then it's a business expense.Yep. If you are willing to pay people money if they do take the corporate housing, then it is automatically a taxable benefit.
Just think, the salary would be taxable. That means the housing is too. It’s not a requirement for the job and it’s not at the convenience of the employer.
It’s just a way to pay your employees more without taxes.
Unless you list that benefit as taxable income, you’re breaking the law.
Not if you offer them an option between additional salary or housing.Wrong again. If the housing is not their primary residence and is located near the customer, then it's a business expense.
But moreso in yours, as your reflexive reaction to this indictment without knowing a thing about it shows.
Irrelevant.Considering I'm probably going to support DeSantis in the primary, your point is wrong.
Irrelevant.
Oh, you will continue to be a good little right-wing cultist one way or the other. And you still have absolutely zero idea what's in the indictment, so maybe consider just taking a hike100% relevant. If Trump was in my head as you counter-claim, I would support him without question.
Oh, you will continue to be a good little right-wing cultist one way or the other. And you still have absolutely zero idea what's in the indictment, so maybe consider just taking a hike
A useless opinion, deriving from cultism, emanating from someone who doesn't even have any idea what is In the indictment.Never, dipshit.
The indictment is bullshit, just like the DA.
A useless opinion, deriving from cultism, emanating from someone who doesn't even have any idea what is In the indictment.
Sure you have. Sure. Apparently you aren't quite sure what audits are like, either.I've read the basics
Nope, ignorantly wrong stillWhen it comes to housing, it’s always illegal.
If it’s done all the time, then they need to start prosecuting it. That’ll stop it.
I
Sure you have. Sure. Apparently you aren't quite sure what audits are like, either.
Which you would say no matter what, because cultism. You said it before you anything about the indictment, and you will still keep saying it if he is convicted.Doubt all you want.
it's still simply a political persecution masquerading as prosecution.
Which you would say no matter what, because cultism. You said it before you anything about the indictment, and you will still keep saying it if he is convicted.
That's not a very smart way of making up your mind about things.because I know the source of the indictment is an anti-trump zealot.
That's not a very smart way of making up your mind about things.