EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 18,596
- 11,602
You've seen Ding post this over and over, the Antarctic ice core "temperature" reading...
Now, whether that is just complete fudge or what they claim it is, "isotope" percentages in the air bubbles trapped in the ice core layers, is debatable.
One thing that is clear is that Earth temps do not "spike down" suddenly at regular intervals. There is no explanation for that at all. None.
Since those aren't actual temperatures, but rather a count of oxygen isotope ratios, the question is then... what affects isotope ratios, and that would be a variety of things including volcano eruption and meteor hits.
In each one of the upward slopes in the graph, both Antarctica and Greenland grew ice core layers (which is why we have the data in the first place) and hence completely disprove the "glacial/interglacial" BS from the Co2 FRAUD because ICE GREW DURING THE INTERGLACIAL refuting the "interglacial"
An interglacial period is a geological interval when the Earth's average temperature is warmer than usual, separating glacial periods within an ice age. During an interglacial period, ice sheets and glaciers retreat,
so how did Greenland and AA "retreat" if THEY BOTH GREW NEW ICE CORE LAYERS during the "interglacial?"
In fact, the oxygen isotope method of determining "past temperatures" is nothing more than a dirty "guess" with other issues affecting it not considered, and that is assuming they actually used it, and did not take the past Co2 readings and simply map that on a "temp chart" and call it "authentic."
Nobody should accept the Vlostok "temperatures" since there is no reason to believe they are accurate or from a reliable method, assuming they aren't fudge, which is always a factor with the Co2 FRAUD.
Now, whether that is just complete fudge or what they claim it is, "isotope" percentages in the air bubbles trapped in the ice core layers, is debatable.
One thing that is clear is that Earth temps do not "spike down" suddenly at regular intervals. There is no explanation for that at all. None.
Since those aren't actual temperatures, but rather a count of oxygen isotope ratios, the question is then... what affects isotope ratios, and that would be a variety of things including volcano eruption and meteor hits.
In each one of the upward slopes in the graph, both Antarctica and Greenland grew ice core layers (which is why we have the data in the first place) and hence completely disprove the "glacial/interglacial" BS from the Co2 FRAUD because ICE GREW DURING THE INTERGLACIAL refuting the "interglacial"
An interglacial period is a geological interval when the Earth's average temperature is warmer than usual, separating glacial periods within an ice age. During an interglacial period, ice sheets and glaciers retreat,
so how did Greenland and AA "retreat" if THEY BOTH GREW NEW ICE CORE LAYERS during the "interglacial?"
In fact, the oxygen isotope method of determining "past temperatures" is nothing more than a dirty "guess" with other issues affecting it not considered, and that is assuming they actually used it, and did not take the past Co2 readings and simply map that on a "temp chart" and call it "authentic."
Nobody should accept the Vlostok "temperatures" since there is no reason to believe they are accurate or from a reliable method, assuming they aren't fudge, which is always a factor with the Co2 FRAUD.
