Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry, precedent was set. The state's job is to enforce the precedent. Go ahead, overturn it. I promise you that within 5 years, all of these laws and legislation will be overturned. And you'll lose all of your political clout in the process. Again, keep returning to the hammer as a means enforcement and eventually it will be used on you.You do know evangelicals are far more strictly pro-life than Catholics, right?
Roe was Judicial strong-arming that failed, it failed at eliminating the argument. 50 years later we are still at it. All overturning Roe does is return the argument to the people via the State level legislatures.
Again, all you are saying is "give me my way, and pray the other side gets the end result eventually"
That isn't compromise, but you pretend it is. At least the guys here posting "no compromise" have the honesty to admit as such.
Sorry, precedent was set. The state's job is to enforce the precedent. Go ahead, overturn it. I promise you that within 5 years, all of these laws and legislation will be overturned. And you'll lose all of your political clout in the process. Again, keep returning to the hammer as a means enforcement and eventually it will be used on you.
Do you believe in an individual's right to choice?Plessey was precedent, was the court of the 50's wrong in overturning that?
Do you believe in an individual's right to choice?
Contraception and sex education have been off the table? Seriously Jack, get a grip on yourself and not below the belt this time.It's been off the table and under attack for years.
Glad to see they are still teaching that at your university.Again, shortest distance between two points is a straight line.
Yes everyone should have the right to choose what is injected or put into their body willingly, but no one may choose for another including the unborn fetus.Do you believe in an individual's right to choice?
No, a compromise is allowing abortion in the first fifteen weeks, allow late term abortions for incest and if the mother or baby life is at danger and not threaten someone with prison time if they go to another state to abort their unwanted child because it didn’t happen within your jurisdiction and do not threaten people with jail time and law suits if they unknowingly transport someone too their abortion…I think we have compromised pretty well for the last 51 years.
No, a compromise is allowing abortion in the first fifteen weeks, allow late term abortions for incest and if the mother or baby life is at danger and not threaten someone with prison time if they go to another state to abort their unwanted child because it didn’t happen within your jurisdiction and do not threaten people with jail time and law suits if they unknowingly transport someone too their abortion…
That is compromise and also day after pills should be allowed along with all forms of birth control…
As for the rape part the individual would still fall under the fifteen week period and should be offered a morning after pill and if they refuse then it is their ignorance and fault for not taking advantage of the time period and pill…
I believe in individual rights. The very right to life trumps all others, in fact.You either believe in individual rights or you don't. I
No, a compromise is allowing abortion in the first fifteen weeks, allow late term abortions for incest and if the mother or baby life is at danger and not threaten someone with prison time if they go to another state to abort their unwanted child because it didn’t happen within your jurisdiction and do not threaten people with jail time and law suits if they unknowingly transport someone too their abortion…
That is compromise and also day after pills should be allowed along with all forms of birth control…
As for the rape part the individual would still fall under the fifteen week period and should be offered a morning after pill and if they refuse then it is their ignorance and fault for not taking advantage of the time period and pill…
There can be no compromise on the issue of abortion without an official recognition of the fact that an abortion kills a child and some attempt to acknowledge the basic human rights of the child that are being systematically denied.No, a compromise is allowing abortion in the first fifteen weeks, allow late term abortions for incest and if the mother or baby life is at danger and not threaten someone with prison time if they go to another state to abort their unwanted child because it didn’t happen within your jurisdiction and do not threaten people with jail time and law suits if they unknowingly transport someone too their abortion…
That is compromise and also day after pills should be allowed along with all forms of birth control…
As for the rape part the individual would still fall under the fifteen week period and should be offered a morning after pill and if they refuse then it is their ignorance and fault for not taking advantage of the time period and pill…
1. The U.S. Government and lawmakers establish the fact that an abortion kills a child.
2. Women can then have all the abortions they want (Constitutional amendment required)
3. Whenever possible, in later-term abortions, the dr. must try to deliver the child alive, place it in the mother's hands and if she wants the child dead, she has to kill it herself.
There can be no compromise on the issue of abortion without an official recognition of the fact that an abortion kills a child and some attempt to acknowledge the basic human rights of the child that are being systematically denied.
Fetuses aren't people.
But even if they were, you can't take rights away from one person in order to maintain another.
If you could, then you should be able to COMPELL bone marrow donations from people who are close genetic matches.
Can the government compel people to take care of their own children?
The at fifteen weeks and before has no way to usually survive outside the womb, so for me allow the abortion.There can be no compromise on the issue of abortion without an official recognition of the fact that an abortion kills a child and some attempt to acknowledge the basic human rights of the child that are being systematically denied.
Is that why they recalled all of that baby formula?Not exactly, but it can remove children from a home where their care is insufficient.
Don't think so. Gotta make sure there's nothing with the baby formula.Is that why they recalled all of that baby formula?
Can the government compel people to take care of their own children?
And if the DNA shows he is the real father, would that change your cause célèbre?Actually, parents can give up their parental rights and obligations.
So, no, they can't.
So I put your "libertarian" view to a test. A man divorces his wife for adultery. Their child has a disease that requires a bone marrow transplant. Should the government compell him to make a donation? What about if it's a Kidney transplant? That seems fair and reasonable. About as reasonable as forcing a woman to carry a fetus to term that she doesn't want.
