What The Democrats Failed To Understand

[Billy_Kinetta]

Of course any Russian hacking must be punished, but the fact remains.

Rep. Rohrabacher: 'I Don't Care Who Provided Us Those Emails. The Emails Were Factual.'

 

[Weatherman2020]

China hacked into the government database and stole personal information on 4 million Federal employees. And Obama did nothing.

 

[leftwinger]

I never heard any of "them" offer any explanation or dispute even that pizza w/walnut sauce email? That was a strange one? Full of weird stuff, yet they say nothing?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

 

[hadit]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

So what is your opinion of the information revealed in the leak? Do you decry it or wish that it had remained uncovered?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

You hate hearing the truth?

You guys loved wikileaks during the Bush years.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

It is a crime, but so.is.perjury and you were fine with Clinton doing that.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

You hate hearing the truth?

You guys loved wikileaks during the Bush years.

You lie.

You've taken that position that hacking should be legal. That makes you a very sad little man.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

It is a crime, but so.is.perjury and you were fine with Clinton doing that.

Clinton was never convicted of perjury.

So you want hacking to be legal because you don't like the fact that Clinton wasn't convicted of perjury.

That is profoundly retarded.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

You hate hearing the truth?

You guys loved wikileaks during the Bush years.

You lie.

You've taken that position that hacking should be legal. That makes you a very sad little man.

Fuck you, I didnt say one.way or.the other, you just dont like what was found. Ive never seen yiu want to go after hackers before, because Obama didnt...hmmmmmmm

 

[leftwinger]

You lie.

You've taken that position that hacking should be legal. That makes you a very sad little man.

First of all you don't even know any hacking occurred? This email dump could have "surrendered" any number of ways.
Secondly is it really a "hack" if someone signs in and gives away password?
Thirdly, Weiner? Huma? Private Server? need I go on.

Ridiculous. Lock up your electrons if you don't want them floating around on others wires.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

It is a crime, but so.is.perjury and you were fine with Clinton doing that.

Clinton was never convicted of perjury.

So you want hacking to be legal because you don't like the fact that Clinton wasn't convicted of perjury.

That is profoundly retarded.

First he sexually harassed an intern you were ok with that

Second he did lie under oath, the only reason he wasnt convicted was democrats voted no. They all said he did it but said it was ok

And again or logic is bullshit, you dont know who the hackers are and there has been no trial.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

Again, au contraire. Hacking is illegal, and should be punished. However, viable information, especially that exposing corruption or other criminal enterprises should not be dispensed with simply because of how it was obtained. It is still truth.

Punish the hacker. Inform the public.

And sorry, but your fantastical "if" did not come to pass, and is therefore no more than a speculative irrelevancy.

 

[hadit]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

So what is your opinion of the information revealed in the leak? Do you decry it or wish that it had remained uncovered?

No comment yet.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

So what is your opinion of the information revealed in the leak? Do you decry it or wish that it had remained uncovered?

No comment yet.

I wish all hackers would fail, or be appropriately punished if they succeed.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

Again, au contraire. Hacking is illegal, and should be punished. However, viable information, especially that exposing corruption or other criminal enterprises should not be dispensed with simply because of how it was obtained. It is still truth.

Punish the hacker. Inform the public.

And sorry, but your fantastical "if" did not come to pass, and is therefore no more than a speculative irrelevancy.

Your right to privacy should never be subject to being trumped by criminal acts to violate it.

 

[hadit]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

So what is your opinion of the information revealed in the leak? Do you decry it or wish that it had remained uncovered?

No comment yet.

I wish all hackers would fail, or be appropriately punished if they succeed.

I do too, but that has nothing to do with the content that was revealed. This isn't a court of law, in which evidence is thrown out if improperly obtained. This is the court of public opinion, and it's valid for us to have opinions about what was released. If a cop was illegally peaking through someone's window and saw him watching child pron, he couldn't arrest the guy, but the neighborhood would benefit from his activity being exposed, yes?

 

[hadit]

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

Again, au contraire. Hacking is illegal, and should be punished. However, viable information, especially that exposing corruption or other criminal enterprises should not be dispensed with simply because of how it was obtained. It is still truth.

Punish the hacker. Inform the public.

And sorry, but your fantastical "if" did not come to pass, and is therefore no more than a speculative irrelevancy.

Your right to privacy should never be subject to being trumped by criminal acts to violate it.

Does an organization have a right to privacy?