Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,205
- 2,320
- Thread starter
- #21
Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.
Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.
You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.
You really believe that hacking should be legal.
Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.
Again, au contraire. Hacking is illegal, and should be punished. However, viable information, especially that exposing corruption or other criminal enterprises should not be dispensed with simply because of how it was obtained. It is still truth.
Punish the hacker. Inform the public.
And sorry, but your fantastical "if" did not come to pass, and is therefore no more than a speculative irrelevancy.
Your right to privacy should never be subject to being trumped by criminal acts to violate it.
Your corruption and criminal acts should never be subject to being excused for being exposed by a criminal act.