What The Democrats Failed To Understand

Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

Again, au contraire. Hacking is illegal, and should be punished. However, viable information, especially that exposing corruption or other criminal enterprises should not be dispensed with simply because of how it was obtained. It is still truth.

Punish the hacker. Inform the public.

And sorry, but your fantastical "if" did not come to pass, and is therefore no more than a speculative irrelevancy.

Your right to privacy should never be subject to being trumped by criminal acts to violate it.

Your corruption and criminal acts should never be subject to being excused for being exposed by a criminal act.
 
Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.


You hate hearing the truth?

You guys loved wikileaks during the Bush years.

You lie.

You've taken that position that hacking should be legal. That makes you a very sad little man.


Fuck you, I didnt say one.way or.the other, you just dont like what was found. Ive never seen yiu want to go after hackers before, because Obama didnt...hmmmmmmm

So you didn't say one way or another. That means you don't care about illegal hacking.
 
Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

Again, au contraire. Hacking is illegal, and should be punished. However, viable information, especially that exposing corruption or other criminal enterprises should not be dispensed with simply because of how it was obtained. It is still truth.

Punish the hacker. Inform the public.

And sorry, but your fantastical "if" did not come to pass, and is therefore no more than a speculative irrelevancy.

Your right to privacy should never be subject to being trumped by criminal acts to violate it.

Your corruption and criminal acts should never be subject to being excused for being exposed by a criminal act.

So the 4th Amendment should be what? Ignored or repealed?
 
What The Democrats Failed To Understand


hillnot-i8440.jpg
 
Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.


You hate hearing the truth?

You guys loved wikileaks during the Bush years.

You lie.

You've taken that position that hacking should be legal. That makes you a very sad little man.


Fuck you, I didnt say one.way or.the other, you just dont like what was found. Ive never seen yiu want to go after hackers before, because Obama didnt...hmmmmmmm

So you didn't say one way or another. That means you don't care about illegal hacking.

No youre trying to dodged the point by talking about hacking, is there legal hacking? If you want to all about it star a new thread, deal with the op or get reported
 
Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.


It is a crime, but so.is.perjury and you were fine with Clinton doing that.

Clinton was never convicted of perjury.

So you want hacking to be legal because you don't like the fact that Clinton wasn't convicted of perjury.

That is profoundly retarded.
He was impeached for perjury, are you stupid or something?
 
Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

Again, au contraire. Hacking is illegal, and should be punished. However, viable information, especially that exposing corruption or other criminal enterprises should not be dispensed with simply because of how it was obtained. It is still truth.

Punish the hacker. Inform the public.

And sorry, but your fantastical "if" did not come to pass, and is therefore no more than a speculative irrelevancy.

Your right to privacy should never be subject to being trumped by criminal acts to violate it.


It's not criminal in Russia to hack America..


So what now?


.
 
Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.


You hate hearing the truth?

You guys loved wikileaks during the Bush years.

You lie.

You've taken that position that hacking should be legal. That makes you a very sad little man.


Fuck you, I didnt say one.way or.the other, you just dont like what was found. Ive never seen yiu want to go after hackers before, because Obama didnt...hmmmmmmm

So you didn't say one way or another. That means you don't care about illegal hacking.

Again who's laws?



.
 
Progressives are and always have been fuck ups... fact
 
Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

It should be illegal to have a person like Pedesta in charge of such an important position, who would fall for a junior high phishing scheme opening up his entire operation to hackers.

Hey, maybe Pedesta was part of the hacking scheme? Cuz, nobody falls for that shit anymore except complete morons.

So either the Clinton campaign was led by a traitor or a moron?

Which was it?
 
Of course any Russian hacking must be punished, but the fact remains.

Rep. Rohrabacher: 'I Don't Care Who Provided Us Those Emails. The Emails Were Factual.'

PSST, election is over.

Time to move on from Podesta's boring ass emails and on to zesty Trump's Russian connections, mountains of conflicts of interest, radical policies borne out of lifetime of ignorance and never ending stream of silly Twitter outbursts from the holder of America's highest office.
 
Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

Again, au contraire. Hacking is illegal, and should be punished. However, viable information, especially that exposing corruption or other criminal enterprises should not be dispensed with simply because of how it was obtained. It is still truth.

Punish the hacker. Inform the public.

And sorry, but your fantastical "if" did not come to pass, and is therefore no more than a speculative irrelevancy.

Your right to privacy should never be subject to being trumped by criminal acts to violate it.


It's not criminal in Russia to hack America..


So what now?


.




acxO0XYYpnfeQ8o7QJAhP19FLeGfdK-KVKXOncXchRIm-xtt1uila4jEbocXqEm0gkEajm_oMmwT8FoP8XR4le_PMoKB0HYBXKePH8S4IPgQtBPMeImUMLJWLKveBg=s0-d
 
Rohrabacher is endorsing a criminal enterprise on the grounds it was potentially beneficial to the Republicans by altering the outcome of an election.

Operation Taco Bowl and Bill Richardson is a Dick........the Russians said that?
 
Au contraire, he is stating that criminal behavior aside, the information exposed unprecedented corruption, and such information is viable regardless of how obtained.

You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

Again, au contraire. Hacking is illegal, and should be punished. However, viable information, especially that exposing corruption or other criminal enterprises should not be dispensed with simply because of how it was obtained. It is still truth.

Punish the hacker. Inform the public.

And sorry, but your fantastical "if" did not come to pass, and is therefore no more than a speculative irrelevancy.

Your right to privacy should never be subject to being trumped by criminal acts to violate it.

Your corruption and criminal acts should never be subject to being excused for being exposed by a criminal act.

So the 4th Amendment should be what? Ignored or repealed?

Factual information about crimes in reality should not be dispensed with to the advantage of the criminal. Period.

Don't get caught. It's that simple.
 
You lie. Hacking is a crime. Emails obtained from hacking are the fruits of a criminal enterprise.

You really believe that hacking should be legal.

Would you say that if the DNC had hacked the RNC and then exposed all those illegally obtained emails.

Again, au contraire. Hacking is illegal, and should be punished. However, viable information, especially that exposing corruption or other criminal enterprises should not be dispensed with simply because of how it was obtained. It is still truth.

Punish the hacker. Inform the public.

And sorry, but your fantastical "if" did not come to pass, and is therefore no more than a speculative irrelevancy.

Your right to privacy should never be subject to being trumped by criminal acts to violate it.

Your corruption and criminal acts should never be subject to being excused for being exposed by a criminal act.

So the 4th Amendment should be what? Ignored or repealed?

Factual information about crimes in reality should not be dispensed with to the advantage of the criminal. Period.

Don't get caught. It's that simple.


Yeah bill clinton got caught in legal way you guys still looked the other way, so.fuck off carb
 

Forum List

Back
Top