When will we make it to .7c for our means

When will we make .7c as the baseline(avg)

  • Before 2018

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Somewhere inbetween 2018-2025

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • 2026-2035

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • 2036-2045

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2046 or later

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Not in the 21st century!

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Mar 16, 2010
59,455
6,797
1,900
The Good insane United states of America
Based on giss we're around .58-.6c for a means...This has remained so since 2005!

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A2.gif

Fig.A2.gif


The questions I am asking you is when will we make it to .7c for our means??? This is a simple .1c increase in warming. This goes for the noaa and giss! We started the 1990's around .3c and ended them near .5c....

1990's .2c = 10 years
2005-2025 = .1c is what I am saying.
 
Last edited:
Based on giss we're around .58-.6c for a means...This has remained so since 2005!

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A2.gif

Fig.A2.gif


The questions I am asking you is when will we make it to .7c for our means??? This is a simple .1c increase in warming. This goes for the noaa and giss! We started the 1990's around .3c and ended them near .5c....

1990's .2c = 10 years
2005-2025 = .1c is what I am saying.

Couldn't you possibly use a less tampered with data base?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
Based on giss we're around .58-.6c for a means...This has remained so since 2005!

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A2.gif

Fig.A2.gif


The questions I am asking you is when will we make it to .7c for our means??? This is a simple .1c increase in warming. This goes for the noaa and giss! We started the 1990's around .3c and ended them near .5c....

1990's .2c = 10 years
2005-2025 = .1c is what I am saying.

Couldn't you possibly use a less tampered with data base?

Well, here's Noaa

global-jan-dec-error-bar-pg.gif


I'll look up the UAH(which is spencers, a skeptics).
 
Can you show us in a lab how an extra 100PPM of CO2 causes temperature to rise by .7 degrees?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Can you show us in a lab how an extra 100PPM of CO2 causes temperature to rise by .7 degrees?

Hey, frank, Look at 21 minutes in this video to see a confirmation for co2 holding heat!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gE6zipFWmo]BBC Documentary Climate Wars Episode 1 - YouTube[/ame]


Now tell me when we will see more warning?
 
Can you show us in a lab how an extra 100PPM of CO2 causes temperature to rise by .7 degrees?

Hey, frank, Look at 21 minutes in this video to see a confirmation for co2 holding heat!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gE6zipFWmo]BBC Documentary Climate Wars Episode 1 - YouTube[/ame]


Now tell me when we will see more warning?

Not what I asked, Dear.

It's a simple experiment to test if CO2 works as you theorize.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Can you show us in a lab how an extra 100PPM of CO2 causes temperature to rise by .7 degrees?

Hey, frank, Look at 21 minutes in this video to see a confirmation for co2 holding heat!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gE6zipFWmo]BBC Documentary Climate Wars Episode 1 - YouTube[/ame]


Now tell me when we will see more warning?

Not what I asked, Dear.

It's a simple experiment to test if CO2 works as you theorize.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFajQNg9yUY]The Greenhouse Effect - Cool Science Experiment - YouTube[/ame]

Experiment - The Greenhouse Effect

Another as a write up of a experiment

Conclusions:

Due to the infrared radiation absorbed by the pure carbon dioxide this gas is heated by far stronger than the air consisting mainly from nitrogen and oxygen. The fraction of carbon dioxide in the air is acting as an greenhouse gas.
 
Frankie boy has been shown many experiments demonstrating CO2 absorbing heat many time. He just ignores the evidence and repeats his nonsensical question on a weekly basis.
 
I'd think a experiment under the same "energy source" like this would be enough to prove the effects of co2. If the one with co2 turns out warmer = proof!

What frank is asking for is impossible...

On the topic of the thread 2025 the "means" yearly temperature will reach .7c. The next nino will have the first .7c yearly temperature...I believe it will be 2015!
 
One is 90's warming rate
The other is since 2001!

.4c should be the norm now for UAH.
.7c should be the norm now for giss
 

Attachments

  • $UAH_LT_1979_thru_April_2014_v5.png
    $UAH_LT_1979_thru_April_2014_v5.png
    55.7 KB · Views: 47
  • $Giss.gif
    $Giss.gif
    31.3 KB · Views: 56
Last edited:
Can you show us in a lab how an extra 100PPM of CO2 causes temperature to rise by .7 degrees?

Hey, frank, Look at 21 minutes in this video to see a confirmation for co2 holding heat!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gE6zipFWmo]BBC Documentary Climate Wars Episode 1 - YouTube[/ame]


Now tell me when we will see more warning?



this experiment was discussed a few years ago when it came out. I dont remember all the details but it took a lot of effort to get it to work. massive CO2 increase, narrow band filters, etc.

Matt- what do you think the experiment shows? nobody denies that CO2 absorbs and disperses some bands of IR. once the IR is stopped does it matter if more CO2 is added, or if the tube length is lengthened? would you be interested in seeing this experiment done with water vapour instead of CO2?

have you thought this whole radiative physics thing through for yourself? surface IR in the appropriate CO2 bands is absorbed to extinction in roughly 10 meters. what then? the time between absorption and emission is much greater than the time between molecular collisions. do you think the original IR energy is transformed back into IR specific bands or into a blackbody(greybody) emission spectra dependant on the temperature of the atmosphere? combination of both perhaps?
 

Forum List

Back
Top