Where is there already a thread.......

iamwhatiseem

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2010
43,059
27,693
2,605
On a hill
I started to post in this thread - but it was closed saying "Already a thread".
So I searched for one - and found exactly zero.

Where is it?

 
I started to post in this thread - but it was closed saying "Already a thread".
So I searched for one - and found exactly zero.

Where is it?

What I would suggest is to start a thread that supports Biden's pattern of sexual deviancy, instead.


That would guarantee it staying in place.
 
here


took 15 secs to find
Well then the search feature sucks.
I searched for "Scott Brown", newer than August 1st. sorted by date.
 
Mods should be required to provide a link before they close a thread

Common courtesy
download.jpg
 
Another problem is that many times the original thread has a silly or unrelated title so it is difficult to see if there is already a thread on it
 
Not our job to do your job.
Take some responsibility for yourself, and not lay it on others to do.

I know, I know, that's not the liberal way to do things.
Nope.
It is called common courtesy.
For you to know there was an existing thread, means you can take 3 seconds to provide the link.
Go ahead... search for scott brown.
Here is what you get:

Untitled.jpg

Because the other thread does not have Scott Brown in the thread title.
But the mod that closed the thread - knew it.
 
Nope.
It is called common courtesy.
For you to know there was an existing thread, means you can take 3 seconds to provide the link.
Go ahead... search for scott brown.
Here is what you get:

View attachment 814456

Because the other thread does not have Scott Brown in the thread title.
But the mod that closed the thread - knew it.
Because the other thread does not have Scott Brown in the thread title.
You narrowed your search too much.

Just look for Scott Brown, much easier.
 
If there is a duplicate thread about Scott Brown, I would assume it has Scott Brown in the title.
But, like already said here, most people name their threads in a vague way.
But, like already said here, most people name their threads in a vague way.
which is why its foolish to limit a search to just the title of the thread.
 
Nope.
It is called common courtesy.
For you to know there was an existing thread, means you can take 3 seconds to provide the link.
Go ahead... search for scott brown.
Here is what you get:

View attachment 814456

Because the other thread does not have Scott Brown in the thread title.
But the mod that closed the thread - knew it.
What do you mean, "NOPE"?
Look, I'm a poster just like you. We don't get paid to moderate.
Take responsibility for your posting, because I'm not going to do it for you.
Sheesh
 

Forum List

Back
Top