Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 96,134
- 71,508
- Thread starter
- #61
Ok, neat fantasy, haha
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok, neat fantasy, haha
Doubtful, and please own your own absurd and stupid thoughts, instead of trying to attribute them to me.
Which is not the equivalent of the very stupid question you asked.But didn't you say essentially that awareness comes from chemical compounds and biolectric potentials?
So what?Are planets self aware? They've been chemicals and biolectric potentials for billions of years
So... what do you think is in your brain, besides chemicals? A special "Essential Frank" substance (like, an essential oil or something) that exists outside of the physical reality?But didn't you say essentially that awareness comes from chemical compounds and biolectric potentials?
Are planets self aware? They've been chemicals and biolectric potentials for billions of years
So... what do you think is in your brain, besides chemicals? A special "Essential Frank" substance (like, an essential oil or something) that exists outside of the physical reality?
YesSo... what do you think is in your brain, besides chemicals? A special "Essential Frank" substance (like, an essential oil or something) that exists outside of the physical reality?
Sure it is. Or maybe not. Useless information.who are you kidding, friek show - physiology is itself a metaphysical substance that disappears when its spiritual content, multi dimensional metaphysical force is removed.
Okay. But such a substance would have zero bearing on any science we do. So you don't have any good basis there to reject any scientific knowledge.
Okay. But such a substance would have zero bearing on any science we do. So you don't have any good basis there to reject any scientific knowledge.
Nothing at all. Fascinating, really.What's wrong with the idea of a self-aware Universe?
Nothing at all. Fascinating, really.
Okay. But that would mean anything you say about it is just made up nonsense. That's a double edged sword.For humans, the vast majority of the Universe is in the Unknowable, we lack the sensory capability to translate most of the Universe.
Okay. But that would mean anything you say about it is just made up nonsense. That's a double edged sword.
But you are the one with zero evidence. Therefore, the only intellectual laziness is on your part. Making stuff up out of thin air is not an intellectual pursuit.. I could see where someone could try to abuse that and use it to cover up their own intellectual laziness
Exactly......"abiogenesis" is actually a basic tenet of the THEORY OF EVOLUTION.........and the very reason there is no LAW OF EVOLUTION. Because abiogenesis and evolution are not FACTS but, "ideas".There's no God, but abiogenesis is actually a part of evolution. The first part. So..
Ya say ya want an ev-o-lu-tion. Well 'el ya know..
- physiology is itself a metaphysical substance that disappears when its spiritual content, multi dimensional metaphysical force is removed.
Sure it is. Or maybe not. Useless information.
100% wrong.Exactly......"abiogenesis" is actually a basic tenet of the THEORY OF EVOLUTION..
It's not a fact. It is the unevidenced and apparently useless claim of a guy on a message board.organic presence is not native to planet Earth but evolved through the atmosphere of the universe whether you can accept the fact or not
When you say things like this, you reveal to educated people that you know less than nothing about how science works and about what theories and laws are.THEORY OF EVOLUTION.........and the very reason there is no LAW OF EVOLUTION.
Could it be that abiogenesis and evolution are both fact and are part of God's design?
I understand how and why people insist on the young age of the Earth (using lineage in Abrahamic religious text). But maybe you just read it a bit wrong? Maybe, it is incomplete information? A thousand years is as a day to God, no? Why not a billion years?
God created man from dust, no? Stardust, it seems. Literal dust. From stars exploding.
Perhaps God chose two "almost ready" early hominids to be the first humans, Adam and Eve. He could have just created other humans as He liked, for them to breed with, I imagine. Or perhaps Adam and Eve were just Moses's stunted interpretation of being shown Y-chromosome Adam and Mitochondrial Eve by God in a vision. Perhaps God showed him a lot of truth, but he could not recall every detail or absorb and understand it all.
I could continue, but that's what threads are for
I don't see the conflict. Surely every monotheist thinks God is capable of both abiogenesis and evolution. No?