MaggieMae
Reality bits
- Apr 3, 2009
- 24,043
- 1,635
- 48
My criticism is more toward the Nobel committee than Obama. He did nothing to deserve the award except spew flowery rhetoric about how the world should be peaceful and come together for a huge tea party.Even Obama was surprised he received the award and admitted there were others more deserving. He did not apply for it.
Those who criticize Obama for receiving the award are just Obama haters.
It is justified to say others are more deserving but to criticize him for winning an award he did not pursue is crazy.
I feel there are probably others more deserving but it is an honor for the US to have their President awarded the prize.
Rather than having reporters throwing shoes at our President we have a prestigous international panel by honoring our President. They are showing respect for the US that has been lacking for the past 8 years.
Prestigious is not a proper adjective to apply to the Nobel committee. Pompous leftists maybe, but prestigious?
A committee of five in a leftist nation decides another leftist should be praised with their now meaningless award. Big deal. Their respect is for Marxism, not the United States.
The above is not a criticism of Obama.
I don't think the Nobel committee ever decides acting alone. Obviously they gather consensus from a variety of other sources and individuals. Otherwise, they would carry no credibility whatsoever except for the prize money. I think what we here in the States forget is that the opinions (and recommendations) for nominees come from all over the world, so an American's own private opinion about the merits of the winner is moot.