"Who won the election in 2020? Why are we still asking that queston, for goodness sake?"

[skews13]

How was it presented without an evidentiary hearing?

You lost. By a lot. It wasn't even close.

 

[Lastamender]

You lost. By a lot. It wasn't even close.

Massive fraud will do that.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You won by 200,000 votes in three states.

You had the lowest popular majority victory (less than 1%) in twelve elections.

You got a two seat majority in the House.

skews13 will be called out every.single.time when he lies.

 

[San Souci]

Who won the election in 2020? Why are we still asking that queston, for goodness sake?"​

Because Republicans cannot erase history
They invented a lie to cover up their election loss.
That lie resulted in the Jan 6 attack on our Capitol

The fact that we still have Republicans who support that lie out of fear of Trump is relevant to their ability to serve our country

Buzz off ,ya commie creep.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Sans Souci is a right wing fascist traitor.

Who won the election in 2020? Why are we still asking that queston, for goodness sake?"​

Because Republicans cannot erase history
They invented a lie to cover up their election loss.
That lie resulted in the Jan 6 attack on our Capitol

The fact that we still have Republicans who support that lie out of fear of Trump is relevant to their ability to serve our country
Click to expand...

Sans Souci Buzz off ,ya commie creep.

 

[Redfish]

There was two weeks before Biden’s Inauguration on Jan 20
All available evidence had been presented and the states and the courts and had certified the results as accurate.

What makes you think any evidence would prove Trump won in just 14 days?

that is not true, not one vote fraud case was ever presented and heard by any court in any state. NOT ONE. Dismissal for a claimed "lack of standing" was a bullshit attempt to keep the truth from coming out and you know it.

 

[Redfish]

Why? 59 of 60 judges says the Orange did not present any probative evidence.

not one case was ever heard in any court in any state, not one. if you think otherwise post the case and its disposition.

 

[Mashmont]

Because Democrats who have a camara pointed at them and a Trump supporter in front of them cannot resist asking that question.

Dick Durbin at the second day of the Pam Bondi hearing:

(6:45) "There are still some out standing issues . . . that I'm struggling with. Let's start with a very important issue. Who won the election in 2020? Why are we still asking that question for goodness sake?"



This has definitely been asked and answered.

Democrats, is it time to give that one a rest?

I would have answered: "No intelligent person believes Biden got the most votes in history by far".

 

[Seymour Flops]

I would have answered: "No intelligent person believes Biden got the most votes in history by far".

Yes, she started to explain the irregularities that she had personally seen, but the Democrat cut her off, of course.

 

[rightwinger]

that is not true, not one vote fraud case was ever presented and heard by any court in any state. NOT ONE. Dismissal for a claimed "lack of standing" was a bullshit attempt to keep the truth from coming out and you know it.

Actually over 60 claims were made with only one supported by the courts
Lack of standing equates to GTF outahere with that BS

 

[rightwinger]

not one case was ever heard in any court in any state, not one. if you think otherwise post the case and its disposition.

Courts are not obligated to hear cases with no merit

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

that is not true, not one vote fraud case was ever presented and heard by any court in any state. NOT ONE. Dismissal for a claimed "lack of standing" was a bullshit attempt to keep the truth from coming out and you know it.

60 were heard and not validated to go further. There was nothing, no evidence. NOT ONE.

 

[Redfish]

Actually over 60 claims were made with only one supported by the courts
Lack of standing equates to GTF outahere with that BS

your knowledge of our legal system is as lacking as your knowledge of politics. lack of standing is a legal trick to keep a case from being presented and adjudged by a jury. Not one vote fraud case was allowed to presented and heard by any court, or the american people in any state of federal jurisdiction. if you claim otherwise post the case and disposition documents.

 

[Redfish]

60 were heard and not validated to go further. There was nothing, no evidence. NOT ONE.

bullshit, not one was presented in any state or federal court. NOT ONE. NO bench trials, no jury trials, not one case was allowed to be presented and ruled on by any judge or jury. Stop lying about this.

 

[rightwinger]

your knowledge of our legal system is as lacking as your knowledge of politics. lack of standing is a legal trick to keep a case from being presented and adjudged by a jury. Not one vote fraud case was allowed to presented and heard by any court, or the american people in any state of federal jurisdiction. if you claim otherwise post the case and disposition documents.

Once again, you don’t know what you are talking about
Lack of standing means…….none of your business

The reason Trumps unsupported claims of a stolen election did not reach trial was that they didn’t meet basic rules of evidence.

The court is under no obligation to hear frivolous claims

 

[Hollie]

Thanks for showing another lie being spread by Conservatives

No, we are not cutting the genitals of children. More fear from your side.

Yes, we do allow children to begin the transition process with consultation of medical experts and their parents.
That is not a decision that should be made by Conservatives who openly hate Transexuals

You child groomers are disgusting. Not so long ago, people like you would be in police handcuffs for child endangerment.

 

[rightwinger]

You child groomers are disgusting. Not so long ago, people like you would be in police handcuffs for child endangerment.

It is impossible to groom a child into a sexuality they don’t associate with

Could you be groomed to become a man?

 

[Hollie]

It is impossible to groom a child into a sexuality they don’t associate with

Could you be groomed to become a man?

It is disgusting that you groomers prey upon children.

Was your manhood groomed away with drugs as a child?

 

[Mashmont]

Once again, you don’t know what you are talking about
Lack of standing means…….none of your business

The reason Trumps unsupported claims of a stolen election did not reach trial was that they didn’t meet basic rules of evidence.

The court is under no obligation to hear frivolous claims

That's false. Lack of standing means a plaintiff does not have a personal stake in the outcome of a case and cannot bring a lawsuit. In this case, the court will dismiss the case without considering the merits of the claim

 

[rightwinger]

That's false. Lack of standing means a plaintiff does not have a personal stake in the outcome of a case and cannot bring a lawsuit.

In other words…
None of your business