Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. It's easier to find work in large communities as opposed to much smaller ones.Aren’t they all dirty, disgusting, dangerous shitholes?
Why would the populous continue to vote themselves down the shitter?
Rich Dems do...and want to raise their own taxes. They know we need a healthy middle class. Unlike the greedy idiot lying GOP rich...What a shame Democrats don't volunteer their own money to the poor, but they don't. That kind of proves their insincerity.
The dupes are misinformed functional trolls when all their talking points get crushed in the real world...Oh look another post about me. You make the topic about me.....then complain when I join you. Lol
Charity sucks, very high overhead and corruption, dries up in hard times. GOP BS...The RICH GOP don't give much, just the suckers...lovely people except their totally misinformed politics...The money doesn't really go to the poor. And the GOP are really the only ones helping the poor. GOP people give more of their own resources to the poor in terms of time and money than do Democrats.
No you dont. That's a lie
Charity sucks, very high overhead and corruption, dries up in hard times. GOP BS...The RICH GOP don't give much, just the suckers...lovely people except their totally misinformed politics...
gop GOVERNMENT SUQS, YES. yOU KNOW NOTHING FACTUAL...DAMMIT LOLSo the government does a much job at handling our money? Boy, are you naive.
4. LOL minorities don't like white rural GOP areas....Actually rural areas have great services and no lines...1. It's easier to find work in large communities as opposed to much smaller ones.
2. It's easier to obtain government handouts in large metropolitan areas, should they lose their jobs.
3. It's easier to find like-minded groups to identify and socialize with.
It is regressive. It puts a bigger burden on low-income earners than high-income earners, for whom the same dollar amount equates to a much larger percentage of total income earned.No we don't have a flat tax system, certainly not for income taxes which is the subject of discussion here.
When a single flat rate income tax is proposed democrats go insane screaming that it's too regressive.
It is regressive. It puts a bigger burden on low-income earners than high-income earners, for whom the same dollar amount equates to a much larger percentage of total income earned.
Like Mr Clean would say…those roadways low income earners use aren’t going to pave themselves.
View attachment 637411
Hahaha…WTF you can’t be serious?Low income earners do not get much out of society, so then they should not be paying much in taxes.
Hold on… I thought you Lefties have said throughout this thread that all the “good jobs” are in the big cities….are we changing to it’s the “abusive jobs” that are in the big cities now?Big cities vote democrat because big cities have big businesses, which are the most abusive and need government regulation the most.
Rural areas don't have the threatening big business that big cities have.
Much easier to get by on cottage industries in rural areas.
That’s what Democrats want….a society full of gov dependent low income earners.I don't consider anything that pays less than $25 per hour a real job nor something to work really hard at. Show up, slow and steady. Econ 101.
It is regressive. It puts a bigger burden on low-income earners than high-income earners, for whom the same dollar amount equates to a much larger percentage of total income earned.
The definition of a flat tax program is everybody pays the same percentage. A true flat tax system would be impossible considering the politics in this country.I’ve never heard of a flat tax proposal that wasn’t based on a percentage. Everyone, to a point, would pay the same percentage of their income in taxes.
