" All Proud About Comfort Zone Claiming It Better Than All The Rest "
* Not All Perspectives Are Equally Valid And Theocracy Is Less Correct Than Independence Of The Individual *
From whence did that statement originate , as it was not a statement or premise posited by this moniker ?
A proponent of legal realism expects that the validity of social civil systems can be based on objective analysis .
When populism is used as justification for validity of a rule , the justification is a logical fallacy termed an appeal to bandwagon .
A tenet of an antinomian creed is that by no name will a law be made , not by mu sa , not by is sa , not by mu ham mad ; antinomian ethos includes paradox and consequent contradictions .
Aside from sexual immorality and the first two edicts of noah creed as punishable by positive law , do not murder , do not commit adultery , do not steal , do not ignore suffering of others , can all be easily deduced from principles of non violence , while establish courts of justice extend to individualism through equitable doctrine .
The first amendment of us republic assures that its government it is not involved in theocratic consternation over worship of idols , or cursing goad , or to sexual immorality when it is a victimless crime .
en.wikipedia.org
Do not worship idols.[25]
Do not curse God.[26]
Do not murder.[27]
Do not commit adultery or sexual immorality.[28]
Do not steal.[29]
Do not eat flesh torn from a living animal.[30]
Establish courts of justice.[32]