LibocalypseNow
Senior Member
- Jul 30, 2009
- 12,337
- 1,368
Him and the UN will reward them with more American Tax Payer cash. It is sad but it is what it is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i have a friend who is a English teacher in S. Korea. He has been there 10 years.Our troops should've evacuated the Korean peninsula decades ago.
Empire sure sucks, man.
Yup. As far as I'm concerned this is China's problem if anybodies.
South Korea is not a U.S. ally? We don't have formal treaties with that country? Cutting and running now would send a terrible message, that the U.S. is a big pussy and if you ally yourself with us and get threatened you can't count on our help.
How is that supposed to help the U.S?
Our troops should've evacuated the Korean peninsula decades ago.
Empire sure sucks, man.
Yup. As far as I'm concerned this is China's problem if anybodies.
South Korea is not a U.S. ally? We don't have formal treaties with that country? Cutting and running now would send a terrible message, that the U.S. is a big pussy and if you ally yourself with us and get threatened you can't count on our help.
How is that supposed to help the U.S?
Looks like the OP is a Keyboard Kommando....wonder if he wants to go volunteer as a mercenary for the South Korean (North Korean if you ask Palin) army.....or is he just a computer tough guy?
B(ad)O(dor)....DUH....C'ya, The Irrelevant LEZBO Sniper, undoubtedly feels that she fulfilled her irrelevant duty by referring to Sarah's gaffe (not unlike Obamadinejad's "57" states) .... now she can crawl back under some rock to wait for another momentous occasion.
Your monumental contribution is noted.
Carry on, you useless crunt.
Will Chesswarsnow volunteer for front line service in any war: or will he puss out?
1. Will Chesswarsnow *Puss Out*, and do nothing?
2. Of course he will!
3. No need to debate it!!!
4. Bring it!!!!!
5. What else would we expect from an armchair warrior!
There's a recruiting office nearby, Rabbi, and judging by your posts and maturity level you are clearly young enough to enlist. Have at it, big boy. Or would you rather real Americans do the fighting for you?
Translation: I am out of witty comments (not that I ever had any) much less arguments.
Thanks for this frank admission. Your homosexual fantasies are disturbing. Were you in the Navy?
You got a problem with the Navy there Rabbi Doucheberg?
Translation: I am out of witty comments (not that I ever had any) much less arguments.
Thanks for this frank admission. Your homosexual fantasies are disturbing. Were you in the Navy?
You got a problem with the Navy there Rabbi Doucheberg?
No, I treasure the traditions of the Navy: Sodomy, rum, and the lash.
Sorry bout that,
Looks like the OP is a Keyboard Kommando....wonder if he wants to go volunteer as a mercenary for the South Korean (North Korean if you ask Palin) army.....or is he just a computer tough guy?
1. What I am doesn't factor into this problem now does it?
2. Please stay on topic, or STFU, okay man?
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
South Korea is more than capable of defending themselves. They are one of the wealthiest economies in Asia, have a modern military, the best equipment and US supplied intelligence. North Korea has no money to sustain a war beyond a week, trouble feeding their troops, poor morale, poor equipment....paper tiger.
Let the US back them with satellite surveilance, sell them equipment and counter any nuclear threat from the north.
No reason to sustain US troops in the line of fire
So your answer is that statist neocon republicans only pay lip service to personal responsibility and dependency when it suits their political agendas...Otherwise it's a dead letter.More military welfare.
At what point do the SoKos stand on their own two feet and demonstrate at least a little self-sufficiency and take r-r-r-r-responsibility (remember that word?) for their own damned country?
So your answer is no, the United States can violate its agreements with other countries.
OK, glad we cleared that one up.
Glad we cleared that one up.
So your answer is that statist neocon republicans only pay lip service to personal responsibility and dependency when it suits their political agendas...Otherwise it's a dead letter.So your answer is no, the United States can violate its agreements with other countries.
OK, glad we cleared that one up.
Glad we cleared that one up.
I asked a reasonable question. The U.S. has a treaty obligation. Your view seems to be that we can hike our obligations anytime it's inconvenient. How's that personal responsibility thing working out?
If we were discussing Indonesia it might be different. But we have dedicated many lives and treasure to helping South Korea and flushing it because...well I really don't know why doesn't make sense to me.
So you can mouthe generalities and left-wing talking points (or is it right wing? Narco-libertarianism always confused me) all you want. But it isn't answering the question.
Hopefully China will be dragged into this one. They should invade and reign North Korea in. North Korea is their creation therefore it's their responsibility to reign them in. Let them fight another useless War. We shouldn't be involved with this one. Why the hell are we still in South Korea. I think 70yrs. is long enough. South Korea can handle themselves at this point.
So your answer is that statist neocon republicans only pay lip service to personal responsibility and dependency when it suits their political agendas...Otherwise it's a dead letter.
Glad we cleared that one up.
I asked a reasonable question. The U.S. has a treaty obligation. Your view seems to be that we can hike our obligations anytime it's inconvenient. How's that personal responsibility thing working out?
If we were discussing Indonesia it might be different. But we have dedicated many lives and treasure to helping South Korea and flushing it because...well I really don't know why doesn't make sense to me.
So you can mouthe generalities and left-wing talking points (or is it right wing? Narco-libertarianism always confused me) all you want. But it isn't answering the question.
We do indeed have obligations via treaties...and living up to them unless the treaty becomes invalid or the other party goes over the borders of the treaty. The thing is not to enter into treaties in the first place if those treaties leave us holding the short end of the stick in the long run.
My $.02...
Hopefully China will be dragged into this one. They should invade and reign North Korea in. North Korea is their creation therefore it's their responsibility to reign them in. Let them fight another useless War. We shouldn't be involved with this one. Why the hell are we still in South Korea. I think 70yrs. is long enough. South Korea can handle themselves at this point.
People seem to think China says jump and Kim says how high. It isn't so. There is a strong relationship and leverage but they are not mere puppets for the Chinese.
I don't know the state of readiness of South Korean troops. I doubt you do either.
Hopefully China will be dragged into this one. They should invade and reign North Korea in. North Korea is their creation therefore it's their responsibility to reign them in. Let them fight another useless War. We shouldn't be involved with this one. Why the hell are we still in South Korea. I think 70yrs. is long enough. South Korea can handle themselves at this point.
People seem to think China says jump and Kim says how high. It isn't so. There is a strong relationship and leverage but they are not mere puppets for the Chinese.
I don't know the state of readiness of South Korean troops. I doubt you do either.
Are you saying that China couldn't take North Korea down? I'm pretty sure China would be successful in taking North Korea out. This should be their problem. North Korea is their puppet. Let them fight this War.
People seem to think China says jump and Kim says how high. It isn't so. There is a strong relationship and leverage but they are not mere puppets for the Chinese.
I don't know the state of readiness of South Korean troops. I doubt you do either.
Are you saying that China couldn't take North Korea down? I'm pretty sure China would be successful in taking North Korea out. This should be their problem. North Korea is their puppet. Let them fight this War.
What meager money N Korea has coming in comes from China, their military is supplied by China. as in the 50s, they could not engage in a shooting war without China
Being that North Korea is one of the few remaining Communist countries left, China does not want to publicaly throw them under the bus. It does not mean they do not apply pressure to N Korea. China needs the west now to continue its modernization...they do not want N Korea to untrack that gray train
Hopefully China will be dragged into this one. They should invade and reign North Korea in. North Korea is their creation therefore it's their responsibility to reign them in. Let them fight another useless War. We shouldn't be involved with this one. Why the hell are we still in South Korea. I think 70yrs. is long enough. South Korea can handle themselves at this point.
People seem to think China says jump and Kim says how high. It isn't so. There is a strong relationship and leverage but they are not mere puppets for the Chinese.
I don't know the state of readiness of South Korean troops. I doubt you do either.
Are you saying that China couldn't take North Korea down? I'm pretty sure China would be successful in taking North Korea out. This should be their problem. North Korea is their puppet. Let them fight this War.