paulitician
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,162
- 1,130
- Thread starter
- #21
If it was your boy Hussein, you'd be calling it an assassination attempt for sure. If you were to be honest, you'd admit i'm right. But hey i know, we don't have an Immigration problem. Everything's just fine.
I actually don't have a "boy Hussein" but since you think I "would" ----------- Link?
I done posted about this yesterday. An attempt is an action -- not a thought. No such action was taken, therefore there's no assassination attempt. The action actually attempted was gun-grabbing. HAD he succeeded at that attempt, he allegedly would have gone on to an assassination attempt.
See those bolded words? That's what we call "future conditional". It's speculation, like what I "would have" done "If" it was "your boy Hussein".
But he didn't succeed at that gun-grab attempt -- which had little chance anyway -- so no, it isn't an assassination attempt. You can't attempt to assassinate somebody without an assassination instrument. Defies the laws of physics.
The kid's a Brit. He's just not used to guns like we are. It would be like you and me flying to London and expecting to immediately be great cricket players.
Why was he attempting to take the officer's weapon? Like i said, if it were your boy Hussein or Hitlery, you'd be calling it an assassination attempt for sure. You're just being disingenuous and hypocritical.
Again----- LINK??
The assertion is, he tried to take the officer's weapon. Why would he do that? Stop being such a disingenuous hypocrite. If it were your boy Hussein or Hitlery, you'd be arguing the exact opposite position on this. Who do you think you're foolin?
Link?
It's an assertion being widely reported.