Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 14,459
- 2,826
- 290
Challenger
90% of the Holocaust survivors who live in Israel are receiving adequate care and assistance from the government or from non-government organizations. 10% seem to have slipped through the cracks of the bureaucracy and appear to require both recognition and additional assistance. We might argue that the criteria for assistance is set too high (though you incorrectly said that proof was required -- its not -- it done by interview and depends on the extent of the persecution suffered). One might even argue that there was not a single Jew alive in Europe of the time of the Shoah who was not persecuted and thus even more people deserve compensation than those who are currently registered.
All these things can be discussed, and we will probably find a high rate of agreement.
However, your posts, including your OP and many of the media reports you linked to, are not designed to discuss flaws in the system of Israel's law. They were meant to villify Israel and particularily the concept of Zionism, as in the right of the Jewish people to a national self-determination.
You appear to be trying to make two points, above and beyond the simple idea that 10% of Israel's Holocaust survivors are not receiving adequate assistance.
First, that Zionism is a failure -- that flaws in the system or bureaucracy of Israel are indications that the Jewish people's self-determination is fundamentally incorrect. That if Zionism can not achieve perfection, then it has no right to exist. That if Zionism were conceptually morally achievable, it could and would be put into perfect practice.
Second, that Zionists themselves are moral failures in their inability to create a perfect society. That Zionists are inherently anti-semitic -- that is hostile and prejudiced towards the Jewish people. That Zionists themselves have an evil intent towards Jews.
Allow me to respond by saying, first that no country in the world is expected to achieve perfection as a condition of their right to self-determination. There is no country in the world with a perfect human rights record or a perfect society. Every one is flawed. Every one has people who slip through the cracks. Canada has an atrocious record with respect to our First Nations peoples. Japan has incredibly high rates of suicide. The US has increasing polarization of race and religious groups. As examples.
You are holding Israel to impossible standards and then applying malicious intent to her failure to achieve those impossibly high standards -- and applying that malicious intent to her people. You are using your invented malicious intent to deny the right of the Jewish people to national self-determination.
Your use of the term "Zionist" gives you away. There is no reason to use that term when discussing flaws in the government of Israel. You should, correctly, just use the term "Israel". After all, if you are simply making a valid criticism of Israel, or its government, why wouldn't you use that term?
90% of the Holocaust survivors who live in Israel are receiving adequate care and assistance from the government or from non-government organizations. 10% seem to have slipped through the cracks of the bureaucracy and appear to require both recognition and additional assistance. We might argue that the criteria for assistance is set too high (though you incorrectly said that proof was required -- its not -- it done by interview and depends on the extent of the persecution suffered). One might even argue that there was not a single Jew alive in Europe of the time of the Shoah who was not persecuted and thus even more people deserve compensation than those who are currently registered.
All these things can be discussed, and we will probably find a high rate of agreement.
However, your posts, including your OP and many of the media reports you linked to, are not designed to discuss flaws in the system of Israel's law. They were meant to villify Israel and particularily the concept of Zionism, as in the right of the Jewish people to a national self-determination.
You appear to be trying to make two points, above and beyond the simple idea that 10% of Israel's Holocaust survivors are not receiving adequate assistance.
First, that Zionism is a failure -- that flaws in the system or bureaucracy of Israel are indications that the Jewish people's self-determination is fundamentally incorrect. That if Zionism can not achieve perfection, then it has no right to exist. That if Zionism were conceptually morally achievable, it could and would be put into perfect practice.
Second, that Zionists themselves are moral failures in their inability to create a perfect society. That Zionists are inherently anti-semitic -- that is hostile and prejudiced towards the Jewish people. That Zionists themselves have an evil intent towards Jews.
Allow me to respond by saying, first that no country in the world is expected to achieve perfection as a condition of their right to self-determination. There is no country in the world with a perfect human rights record or a perfect society. Every one is flawed. Every one has people who slip through the cracks. Canada has an atrocious record with respect to our First Nations peoples. Japan has incredibly high rates of suicide. The US has increasing polarization of race and religious groups. As examples.
You are holding Israel to impossible standards and then applying malicious intent to her failure to achieve those impossibly high standards -- and applying that malicious intent to her people. You are using your invented malicious intent to deny the right of the Jewish people to national self-determination.
Your use of the term "Zionist" gives you away. There is no reason to use that term when discussing flaws in the government of Israel. You should, correctly, just use the term "Israel". After all, if you are simply making a valid criticism of Israel, or its government, why wouldn't you use that term?