Youth activists win unprecedented victory in suit suing Montana for ignoring climate change

[Bob Blaylock]

Half of the world is on fire and the other half is drowning. Wake up FFS.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It illustrates how easy it is to fuck up the feeble minded,

I will give you that much. This is a point that you very strongly demonstrate, early every time you post.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Tommy Tainant laughs .. yet .. doesn't provide any evidence of the outcome. Convince us with the science .. and leave the emotion, which has been demonstrably WRONG for the last 50 years.

His “science” asserts that Bruce Jenner is a woman.

 

[westwall]

Youth activists win major victory in suit suing Montana for ignoring climate change

Lawsuit from Montana climate activists is first such youth-led case to go to trial and win

www.independent.co.uk

Montana violated a provision in the state constitution guaranteeing citizens a “clean and healthful environment” by declining to consider the climate impacts of fossil fuel projects, a judge ruled Monday in a landmark lawsuit brought by youth climate activists.

“Montana’s (greenhouse gas) emissions and climate change have been proven to be a substantial factor in causing climate impacts to Montana’s environment and harm and injury to the youth plaintiffs,” Lewis and Clark County District Court Judge Kathy Seeley wrote in her ruling.

Well done Montana.

This victory is likely to release a raft of similar cases across the country. Its a welcome response to the rossil fuel sponsored climate denial that blights any disccussion of the issue.

It would be good to see the oil company bosses and their lackeys up on charges as well. they have caused so much damage.

Things are looking up but its so important that a bonehead republican does not win next year.

I agree. Let's run the grid only on green power. You will be dead within weeks.

Win/win!

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I agree. Let's run the grid only on green power. You will be dead within weeks.

Win/win!

Our leading citizen scientist speaks.
How about we ignore your pathetic straw man and transition to greener power as quickly as possible. ?
Maybe give our kids a chance

 

[Tommy Tainant]

His “science” asserts that Bruce Jenner is a woman.

Your cult believes in singing rocks so fuck off.

 

[westwall]

Our leading citizen scientist speaks.
How about we ignore your pathetic straw man and transition to greener power as quickly as possible. ?
Maybe give our kids a chance

Green power kills. Were you not a scientific illiterate you would know that.

The whole climate change fraud has zero to do with conserving the environment, but EVERYTHING to do with controlling the people.

 

[Rogue AI]

Our leading citizen scientist speaks.
How about we ignore your pathetic straw man and transition to greener power as quickly as possible. ?
Maybe give our kids a chance

A chance a what? Poverty? No doubt you can provide that without dragging everyone down with you. The ridiculous demands of the eco-nazi cult are unrealistic and based on emotion not science.

 

[jotathought]

His “science” asserts that Bruce Jenner is a woman.

Agree .. it's all concept .. with no detail to justify or substantiate a decision.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I agree. Let's run the grid only on green power. You will be dead within weeks.

Problem with that is a lot of other people will be harmed by that as well, who do not deserve it. The weakest will be harmed the most of course, and that certainly includes Tainted Tommy.

Either he truly lacks the capacity to understand how he would himself be impacted by what he demands, or else he somehow imagines that he will be exempt from making the sacrifices that he thinks that others should make.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Your cult believes in singing rocks so fuck off.

I have absolutely no idea at all what that is supposed to mean. Neither, I very much suspect, do you.

 

[toobfreak]

Youth activists win unprecedented victory in suit suing Montana for ignoring climate change​

They've won nothing, you motormouth pinhead, Montana will do nothing as a result of this and will have the decision overturned.

How can you sue someone for ignoring something that no one can even conclusively prove exists?! Further, how can you show any difference between ignoring and not ignoring it when no one can show any conclusive RESULTS from doing either?

Show me the difference between what Biden has graphically accomplished in improving the climate over what Montana has failed to do? You cannot. The climate is inextricably tied together world-wide, so how can ANYONE truly affect "climate change" when other nations are ignoring it pouring out carbon and pollution at an all time high such as China and India?

 

[Independent thinker]

Youth activists win major victory in suit suing Montana for ignoring climate change

Lawsuit from Montana climate activists is first such youth-led case to go to trial and win

www.independent.co.uk

Montana violated a provision in the state constitution guaranteeing citizens a “clean and healthful environment” by declining to consider the climate impacts of fossil fuel projects, a judge ruled Monday in a landmark lawsuit brought by youth climate activists.

“Montana’s (greenhouse gas) emissions and climate change have been proven to be a substantial factor in causing climate impacts to Montana’s environment and harm and injury to the youth plaintiffs,” Lewis and Clark County District Court Judge Kathy Seeley wrote in her ruling.

Well done Montana.

This victory is likely to release a raft of similar cases across the country. Its a welcome response to the rossil fuel sponsored climate denial that blights any disccussion of the issue.

It would be good to see the oil company bosses and their lackeys up on charges as well. they have caused so much damage.

Things are looking up but its so important that a bonehead republican does not win next year.

How do you feel this will turn out on the Supreme Court?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

They've won nothing, you motormouth pinhead, Montana will do nothing as a result of this and will have the decision overturned.

How can you sue someone for ignoring something that no one can even conclusively prove exists?! Further, how can you show any difference between ignoring and not ignoring it when no one can show any conclusive RESULTS from doing either?

Show me the difference between what Biden has graphically accomplished in improving the climate over what Montana has failed to do? You cannot. The climate is inextricably tied together world-wide, so how can ANYONE truly affect "climate change" when other nations are ignoring it pouring out carbon and pollution at an all time high such as China and India?

Only a few extremists do not believe it.
The same people think the election was stolen and Michelle is a man.
Another nutcase theory dies in the court.

 

[toobfreak]

The same people think the election was stolen

Nothing to "think," fruitcake. It would be amazing, considering the massive volume of evidence, facts, admissions and history, it is weren't stolen, in fact, a literal impossibility.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

How do you feel this will turn out on the Supreme Court?

Rather well. Montana isnt denying the science. They were denying their part in it.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Nothing to "think," fruitcake. It would be amazing, considering the massive volume of evidence, facts, admissions and history, it is weren't stolen, in fact, a literal impossibility.

Go tell the judge you fucking loon.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

And the left in this country will applaud themselves, and pat themselves on the back for ending fossil fuels, as they export their virtue to China who will be massively mining the planet with slave labor for the precious metals that will be in huge demand to run their electric vehicles.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Voting for democrats is a vote to voluntarily lower Americans living standards and increasing poverty.

 

[toobfreak]

Go tell the judge you fucking loon.

Tell what judge, asshole? No judge determined that the election WASN'T stolen!