Jan. 6th, The Law, and Nancy Pelosi's Dereliction of Duty

[elektra]

First of all, your claim is the Senate isn't even in charge of it. Now you saying the are.

Secondly, if Congress was in charge of it, the CPB would have only the 2 Sergeant-at-Arms on the board. No one else.

I made no claim, I stated facts, with links, in which you twist around until your reply does not reflect what you are responding to.

In charge of what? In charge of policing? In charge of declaring an emergency? In charge of protecting the legislative branch of government.

you need to speak in the context of the laws and be specific.

 

[beautress]

And yet, there is evidence he attempted to have Biden's electors discarded with his own fake electors.

That evidence was declared unsubstantial due to its political aim at taking out a presidential challenger.

 

[Faun]

That evidence was declared unsubstantial due to its political aim at taking out a presidential challenger.

LOL

Oh? Who declared that "unsubstantial?"

 

[beautress]

And yet, there is evidence he attempted to have Biden's electors discarded with his own fake electors.

Oh my goodness! I had NO idea that the grapevine said so was so credible in a court of law. Silly me.

LOL

Oh? Who declared that "unsubstantial?"

EINSTEIN ME.

 

[Faun]

Oh my goodness! I had NO idea that the grapevine said so was so credible in a court of law. Silly me.

EINSTEIN ME.

So nobody of any consequence. Thanks for clarifying.

 

[elektra]

So nobody of any consequence. Thanks for clarifying.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPRACTICE-115/pdf/GPO-HPRACTICE-115.pdf

Safety and Dignity; Comfort and Convenience A resolution directing an investigation into the safety of Members in light of alleged structural deficiencies in the Capitol gives rise to a question of the privileges of the House, as does a resolution directing the appointment of a select committee to inquire into fire safety of the environs of the House. A resolution directing the Sergeant-at-Arms to alert House personnel of the dangers of electronic security breaches gives rise to a question of the privileges of the House. Manual § 705.

 

[elektra]

And neither house is in charge of it all.

Nobody is in charge of the security of the Capitol, that makes no sense. Who exactly is in charge.

 

[Lesh]

I hope that narrative is untrue. Trump has never been known to engage in pulling fast ones. Didn't you know?

That was sarcasm… right?

 

[elektra]

That was sarcasm… right?

why would you think it is sarcasm, in regard to Jan. 6th

 

[Faun]

Nobody is in charge of the security of the Capitol, that makes no sense. Who exactly is in charge.

Retard, I never said "nobody" is in charge of Capitol security. I said the CPB is.

 

[elektra]

Retard, I never said "nobody" is in charge of Capitol security. I said the CPB is.

You are telling us congress has no control of security.

 

[Faun]

You are telling us congress has no control of security.

They have control to some degree by virtue of each chamber having a Sergeant-at-Arms on the CPB.

 

[elektra]

They have control to some degree by virtue of each chamber having a Sergeant-at-Arms on the CPB.

And that they right the laws to protect themselves, just like every mayor in every city is responsible for security.

 

[Faun]

And that they right the laws to protect themselves, just like every mayor in every city is responsible for security.

Laws governing security is one thing. Calling up the DCNG is another. That's governed by the Executive branch with the president the ultimate authority.

 

[elektra]

Laws governing security is one thing. Calling up the DCNG is another. That's governed by the Executive branch with the president the ultimate authority.

Again, you fail to comprehend that the executive branch of government can not unilaterally order Federal troops outside the executive branch's jurisdiction. You have seen the law that explicitly states how authorization is given.

 

[elektra]

You have no law approved by Pelosi giving her power over the CPB or in regard to J6.

The Capitol Police Board has 4 members.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPRACTICE-115/pdf/GPO-HPRACTICE-115.pdf

§ 3. Removal From Office Both the Speaker and the House have the authority to remove the Clerk, Sergeant-at-Arms, or Chief Administrative Officer. Clause 1 of rule II; Manual § 640.

 

[Marener]

The Capitol Police Board has 4 members.

One member is responsible to the speaker.
One member is responsible to the majority leader
One member is responsible to the president.
One member can't vote.

Sure looks like the president has about as much input on the Capitol board as Nancy Pelosi.

 

[Faun]

Again, you fail to comprehend that the executive branch of government can not unilaterally order Federal troops outside the executive branch's jurisdiction. You have seen the law that explicitly states how authorization is given.

Says you. Meanwhile, the president is the ultimate authority over the DCNG for all of DC.

 

[Faun]

The Capitol Police Board has 4 members.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPRACTICE-115/pdf/GPO-HPRACTICE-115.pdf

§ 3. Removal From Office Both the Speaker and the House have the authority to remove the Clerk, Sergeant-at-Arms, or Chief Administrative Officer. Clause 1 of rule II; Manual § 640.

So? The House elects the Sergeant-at-Arms and the House can remove them from that position. WTF is your point?

 

[elektra]

So? The House elects the Sergeant-at-Arms and the House can remove them from that position. WTF is your point?

You have no law approved by Pelosi giving her power over the CPB or in regard to J6.
There is no House rule that puts Pelosi in charge of the CPB.

Looks like you are wrong again, Pelosi has power over the CPB
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPRACTICE-115/pdf/GPO-HPRACTICE-115.pdf
§ 3. Removal From Office Both the Speaker and the House have the authority to remove the Clerk, Sergeant-at-Arms, or Chief Administrative Officer. Clause 1 of rule II; Manual § 640.