Joe Biden's son will go to trial for federal gun crimes in June

[marvin martian]

Who are hired to do their job. Care to guess what a defense lawyers job is?




Who? Can’t find any cheering.

Most seem to want him prosecuted like anyone else.

You are digging yourself in deeper trying to support a thread fail.



Unlike you, I believe our justice system is overall, a good one. I may not always agree with verdicts but it is by far a better, less corrupt system than most.

Your major fail here Marvin, is in thinking anyone (other than you guys) cares that much about Hunter Biden.

If he is found guilty, let the chips fall where they may.

You know this site has a search feature, right?

LOL

CONFIRMED: DAVID WEISS ONLY GOT A GUN CRIME ICLOUD WARRANT 81 DAYS AFTER INDICTING HUNTER BIDEN​

That, my republican friends, is game, match, and set.

The "evidence" is now not useable in court.

It's all over but the crying, and I predict much crying in this very thread.

View attachment 893605

Eventually, he's going to get the deal that was yanked for political reasons.

No one in his position faces jail time.

And do you gun rights nuts want Hunter to fight the gun charge? Will you support him?

Yea. Hunter wasn't high when he purchased the gun. He just had a history with drugs.

And I'm not talking about pot. Coke, meth, crack, heroine. How about Oxycotton or those type of drugs? If you got addicted and had to seek treatment, no guns for you. Maybe just hunting guns and a revolver.

The diary is fake
the laptop is fake.
The gun violation is a nothingburger.

I agree OP, remind us which party is using lawfare to attack American gun-owners....

Republicans want it both ways: less gun control and Hunter Biden gun charges

Conservative efforts to expand the second amendment are exactly what may help Hunter Biden in court

www.theguardian.com

Um, guy, you want to punish Hunter for being Biden's son.

The VERY FEW people who are prosecuted for lying on this form are usually hiding criminal history, not drug use, and are only proscuted because they used that gun to commit other crimes.

Hunter checked "no" because, like most addicts, he didn't think he had a problem.

Few Prosecutions For Lying On ATF Gun-Purchase Form

Form 4473 — the Firearm Transaction Record — is a six-page document that must be filled out whenever someone buys a firearm from a licensed firearm dealer. It asks questions including whether the buyer is addicted to drugs, and is the actual buyer of the firearm. A tweet by the Bureau of...

www.ncja.org

 

[Billiejeens]

Your major fail here Marvin, is in thinking anyone (other than you guys) cares that much about Hunter Biden.

Some truth to that -

Alvin bragg might be a good example of not caring unless one's name is Trump.

He has religiously not cared, he's lowered or dismissed charges against virtually everyone not named President Trump.

 

[Billiejeens]

Exactly. That lowlife fuck should be doing life with convicts that know what to do with pedophiles.

I like how the marxist parasites pretend there's not 500 MB of Hunter underaged porn available from the "Laptop From Hell".

At one time it was Russian disinformation (50 traitors signed off on it!) and now that it's been confirmed by the ny times and fbi, well it just doesn't exist. He did NOT rape and torture underage girls... don't believe your lying eyes!

It is really not so much that they don't believe, they simply don't care -

 

[Votto]

and btw, the charge is not so serious. He was not in possession and involved in any violent crimes.


and you people should love this:
Likening drug users to people who are "mentally ill and dangerous," the ruling says barring them from owning firearms is not unconstitutional on its face.

and like with Trump, it's not over even if and when he is convicted:

Noreika's ruling leaves the door open to an "as-applied" challenge if and when Biden is convicted, meaning he can still argue that his prosecution violates the Second Amendment at that point. That claim may ultimately be resolved by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which has yet to address the constitutionality of Section 922(g)(3) under the test that the U.S. Supreme Court established in the 2022 case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.*

And let it be known, Hunter Biden is not running for political office, though if he wins maybe he should. As a convicted man he'd certainly qualify as a MAGA candidate.

Hunter only made a false claim that he was not taking illicit drugs while in possession of a firearm which is a felony

It's not like he was paying off a whore to keep quiet about their consensual affair.

If he had done that, he would have been hung.

 

[Polishprince]

Why don't prosecutors just make a deal with Hunter, agreeing to keep him out of prison for a guilty plea if he rats out people higher on the Food Chain?

 

[Billiejeens]

Why don't prosecutors just make a deal with Hunter, agreeing to keep him out of prison for a guilty plea if he rats out people higher on the Food Chain?

Is it because he is not suicidal?

 

[Rambunctious]

After all of the Biden lawfare thrown at Trump its so ironic that its a Biden who will occupy a prison cell....

 

[marvin martian]

and btw, the charge is not so serious. He was not in possession and involved in any violent crimes.


and you people should love this:
Likening drug users to people who are "mentally ill and dangerous," the ruling says barring them from owning firearms is not unconstitutional on its face.

and like with Trump, it's not over even if and when he is convicted:

Noreika's ruling leaves the door open to an "as-applied" challenge if and when Biden is convicted, meaning he can still argue that his prosecution violates the Second Amendment at that point. That claim may ultimately be resolved by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which has yet to address the constitutionality of Section 922(g)(3) under the test that the U.S. Supreme Court established in the 2022 case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.*

And let it be known, Hunter Biden is not running for political office, though if he wins maybe he should. As a convicted man he'd certainly qualify as a MAGA candidate.

It's a federal felony. But, now we know your real stance on gun control...it's "not so serious".

I knew it.

LOL

 

[Coyote]

You know this site has a search feature, right?

LOL

Yup. The one that says it is a “nothingburger” is correct, this is probably the mildest possible gun charge.

What do you think should be done?

Is anyone on left the calling to change gun laws?

What is wrong with his lawyers‘ strategy?

 

[Coyote]

After all of the Biden lawfare thrown at Trump it’s so ironic that its a Biden who will occupy a prison cell....

You realize most of Trumps career was built on lawfare through lawsuits, right?

I doubt Trump will ever occupy a prison cell due to his former position. I doubt Hunter Biden will either, not for this charge.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

It's a federal felony. But, now we know your real stance on gun control...it's "not so serious".

I knew it.

LOL

It's not. Look at others who have had the same charges. Weed out (pun?) violent and habitual criminals, and what have we? Few if any are defending Hunter calling the charges witch hunt, false, blah, blah, blah, trump...

 

[marvin martian]

Yup. The one that says it is a “nothingburger” is correct, this is probably the mildest possible gun charge.

What do you think should be done?

Is anyone on left the calling to change gun laws?

What is wrong with his lawyers‘ strategy?

Interesting. So you agree that federal background checks are unconstitutional?

 

[Billiejeens]

You realize most of Trumps career was built on lawfare through lawsuits, right?

I doubt Trump will ever occupy a prison cell due to his former position. I doubt Hunter Biden will either, not for this charge.

Which crime of the hundreds do you think that it will be?

 

[Coyote]

It's a federal felony. But, now we know your real stance on gun control...it's "not so serious".

I knew it.

LOL

Just curious…I can’t find you fighting Biden’s charges on behalf of 2A….?

 

[marvin martian]

It's not. Look at others who have had the same charges. Weed out (pun?) violent and habitual criminals, and what have we? Few if any are defending Hunter calling the charges witch hunt, false, blah, blah, blah, trump...

Thanks for the confirmation, and the surrender on "gun control".

LOL

 

[Coyote]

Interesting. So you agree that federal background checks are unconstitutional?

Nope. Try again.

 

[Coyote]

Which crime of the hundreds do you think that it will be?

For which person?

 

[marvin martian]

Just curious…I can’t find you fighting Biden’s charges on behalf of 2A….?

So you believe federal background checks are unconstitutional?

 

[Coyote]

So you believe federal background checks are unconstitutional?

Try again.

 

[marvin martian]

Try again.

Then you support prosecuting Joe Biden's son for federal gun crimes?