- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,270
- 28,247
- 2,180
But there’s no scientific knowledge on how extinctions happened. Now you expect to sell they know how to avoid it?Not here on earth. The idea isn’t to guarantee survival, it’s to extend survival.
You’re a puppet
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But there’s no scientific knowledge on how extinctions happened. Now you expect to sell they know how to avoid it?Not here on earth. The idea isn’t to guarantee survival, it’s to extend survival.
Work at what?It works only as well as we work at it.
Except!!!However, desertification is increasing across the globe.
Well saidWe are carbon-based lifeforms. The attacks on CO2 are attacks on life.
Period.
End of story.
A stupid one at that.But there’s no scientific knowledge on how extinctions happened. Now you expect to sell they know how to avoid it?
You’re a puppet
The entire bed wetter agenda is intended to cause harm to America. Regardless of the issue, all bed wetter policies are implemented for the purpose of marginalizing, declining and destroying US dominance in the world.We are carbon-based lifeforms. The attacks on CO2 are attacks on life.
Period.
End of story.
However, desertification is increasing across the globe.
The attacks on CO2 are attacks on life.
But he’s Dagosa and he knows everything! So much so, he can’t ever share his knowledgeIt won't work...species extinction has a 97% success rate....pretty doubtful that we will beat it.
Except,Yes ... some parts of AGW are fairly clear-cut ... especially the clear-cutting of forestlands ... ha ha ... that's pretty clear-cut evidence IMEIO ... and I think we can all agree man-kind could be better stewards of the land ...
From Wikipedia:
"The most widely accepted of [the many many definitions of desertification] was that of the Princeton University Dictionary which defined it as "the process of fertile land transforming into desert typically as a result of deforestation, drought or improper/inappropriate agriculture". This definition clearly demonstrated the interconnectedness [sic] of desertification and human activities, in particular land use and land management practices."
That's different from the magical forces of carbon dioxide to warm the atmosphere by more than a degree or two ... which of course plants also enjoy ... especially human food crops most always do better in warmer climates ... visit California's Imperial Valley in December if you don't believe me ...
Warmer means wetter ... Meteorology 201 ...
Nah, I’m just not a lazy denier like you.But he’s Dagosa and he knows everything! So much so, he can’t ever share his knowledge
Correct, you’re a fear mongering puppet with absolutely nothing to shareNah, I’m just not a lazy denier like you.
That’s just your lazy ass talking. But then, you claim to be smarter than science, just like that imbecile Trump.But there’s no scientific knowledge on how extinctions happened. Now you expect to sell they know how to avoid it?
You’re a puppet
Share ? You think I’d do your work for you like you cheated off other students in school ? You’re a bagger, a scammer…Correct, you’re a fear mongering puppet with absolutely nothing to share
Did you ever pass home schooling ?Did nasa land a man on the moon?
We're awash in CO2.We are carbon-based lifeforms. The attacks on CO2 are attacks on life.
Period.
End of story.
We'll need to watch global food production. I'm guessing it will be negatively affected by global warming.Yes ... some parts of AGW are fairly clear-cut ... especially the clear-cutting of forestlands ... ha ha ... that's pretty clear-cut evidence IMEIO ... and I think we can all agree man-kind could be better stewards of the land ...
From Wikipedia:
"The most widely accepted of [the many many definitions of desertification] was that of the Princeton University Dictionary which defined it as "the process of fertile land transforming into desert typically as a result of deforestation, drought or improper/inappropriate agriculture". This definition clearly demonstrated the interconnectedness [sic] of desertification and human activities, in particular land use and land management practices."
That's different from the magical forces of carbon dioxide to warm the atmosphere by more than a degree or two ... which of course plants also enjoy ... especially human food crops most always do better in warmer climates ... visit California's Imperial Valley in December if you don't believe me ...
Warmer means wetter ... Meteorology 201 ...
.04% CO2 hardly qualifies as "awash", swampy.We're awash in CO2.