Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
How is H.B. 1503 a conspiracy theory when in fact it has been filed in the house?
H.R. 1503: To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal campaign committee of... (GovTrack.us)
Sponsor: Rep. Bill Posey [R-FL15]show cosponsors (11)
Cosponsors:Marsha Blackburn [R-TN7]Dan Burton [R-IN5]John Campbell [R-CA48]John Carter [R-TX31]John Culberson [R-TX7]Trent Franks [R-AZ2] Louis Gohmert [R-TX1]Robert Goodlatte [R-VA6]Kenny Marchant [R-TX24]Randy Neugebauer [R-TX19]Ted Poe [R-TX2]
Text: Summary | Full Text
Status: Introduced Mar 12, 2009
Referred to Committee View Committee Assignments
Reported by Committee ...
House Vote ...
Senate Vote ...
Signed by President ...
This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills and resolutions first go to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills and resolutions never make it out of committee. [Last Updated: Jan 5, 2010 10:24PM]
too funny.....doggy is once again running away from the debate and focusing on his whining about the rules....
anyways...back to the topic, are you going to address the issues i've repeatedly raised or this to be yet another doggy runs away thread?
And the right continue to empahsize his middle name why if not for his Muslim roots?
Didn't he tell us he is a christian...wait...or did he lie about that.
I believe birtherism is a moondoggie conspiracy, but if such a bill were filed in the House, then it should be discussed appropriately, and that is not in the flame zone.
too funny.....doggy is once again running away from the debate and focusing on his whining about the rules....
anyways...back to the topic, are you going to address the issues i've repeatedly raised or this to be yet another doggy runs away thread?
I'm addressing the issues. This has been debated hundreds of times on this board and not only that but by me too. I'm not going to address the same partisan bullshit a hundred times over. If you want my responses, go to the previous threads on this same shit and look.
I'm also trying to help him with the rules so he doesn't get the thread closed. Otherwise that would just result him in more whining from him about the mods which will result in a nice little vacation. Have you even bothered to help the guy or are you just attacking me? Why don't you direct him where to go? I've done more to help him than you.
you're not running away again are you dogbert?
you're not running away again are you dogbert?
The only one who needs to stop whining and calm down is you Yurt. You are a overemotional child, and having just graduated high school a year ago, I know them when I see them.
You want to falsely claim I complained to the mods, I didn't. The bill itself is in just promoting the birther conspiracy about Obama. The bill itself and it's existence is not a conspiracy and I never said it was. The OP is a birther and this thread is obviously to promote the birther movement.
I don't know why it's in the conspiracy forum as I'm not a mod and I didn't move it here. If you have such a problem, ask a mod. You keep questioning the mod's decision as if I had something to do with it.
I would have no problem with this bill if it wasn't for the fact it is tailormade to act as if Obama illegally won the Presidency. It is instilling it without saying it.
It's a conspiracy because the theory they're putting forth is a conspiracy.
1. how is this bill a conspiracy? and what in this thread is a conspiracy?
2. why is it bad to verify the eligibility of a candidate for the office of potus?
3. as this bill doesn't take effect until 2012, how is it only about obama?
lol...its so easy to catch you in lies...you still have not addressed my 3 simple points, i am not surprised you're running away again. i am sure we will be treated to another pissed and screaming post by you, yet what we will probably not be treated to is a post that addresses the issues.
i said you "probably" whined to the mods. i never made the claim that you did, given your massive whining in this thread, i wouldn't be surprised if you did.
you never said it is a conspiracy? really.....
It's a conspiracy because the theory they're putting forth is a conspiracy.
care to own up to your dishonesty now?
1. what exactly in the bill is tailormade to obama?
2. what exactly in the bill makes it appear obama won illegally?
here are the other questions you keep running from (post 50)
1. how is this bill a conspiracy? and what in this thread is a conspiracy?
2. why is it bad to verify the eligibility of a candidate for the office of potus?
3. as this bill doesn't take effect until 2012, how is it only about obama?
let's see if you can calmly and rationally address the 5 issues.
We SHOULD care. It goes beyond ridiculing those who have raised doubts.3 dozen Arizona state legislators? Who cares?
More federal lawmakers than that wanted the last president impeached.
Again who cares.
lol...its so easy to catch you in lies...you still have not addressed my 3 simple points, i am not surprised you're running away again. i am sure we will be treated to another pissed and screaming post by you, yet what we will probably not be treated to is a post that addresses the issues.
i said you "probably" whined to the mods. i never made the claim that you did, given your massive whining in this thread, i wouldn't be surprised if you did.
you never said it is a conspiracy? really.....
It's a conspiracy because the theory they're putting forth is a conspiracy.
care to own up to your dishonesty now?
1. what exactly in the bill is tailormade to obama?
2. what exactly in the bill makes it appear obama won illegally?
here are the other questions you keep running from (post 50)
1. how is this bill a conspiracy? and what in this thread is a conspiracy?
2. why is it bad to verify the eligibility of a candidate for the office of potus?
3. as this bill doesn't take effect until 2012, how is it only about obama?
let's see if you can calmly and rationally address the 5 issues.
Find a mod that said I whined about this thread to them in a pm or apologize. Fucking dishonest hack that you are. I already answered your questions, but since you're too stupid to read.
1.) The bill is practically saying that someone illegally won the Presidency when that is not so. That's why it's wrong in my opinion.
2.) See #1
3.) I never said the existence of the bill was a conspiracy, rather the contents that once again suggest that Obama is an illegal. And in this thread, the OP is a birther and said WND is a viable source. WND is about as much of a viable source as the writings on a bathroom wall.
4.) I never said it was bad, I'm saying it's unnecessary as a President who has taken office has not been illegal yet. And we've had how many elections? You do the math.
5.) Because they don't want to come off as birthers to the voters.
Now, I have answered all of your questions in the order you asked them in the last post. I'm not scared nor I am running you pathetic hack. Now, I am going to go focus my attention on other threads because I have wasted enough time here dealing with your childish babble. I'm not going to sit here like Divecon does with the truthers and put up with the bullshit constantly day in and day out when the matter is settled.