9th Circuit knee caps dem voting plan

[Missouri_Mike]

As it should be you have to prove citizenship to register to vote. Maybe we are approaching common sense. Non-citizens don’t get to vote in anything.

BREAKING: Ninth Circuit Delivers Decision on Citizenship and Voter Registration in Arizona

redstate.com

 

[Moonglow]

Well duh it's a federal law...

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

As it should be you have to prove citizenship to register to vote. Maybe we are approaching common sense. Non-citizens don’t get to vote in anything.

BREAKING: Ninth Circuit Delivers Decision on Citizenship and Voter Registration in Arizona

redstate.com

Again, for those that need a remedial course in reading, here are the current voter registration laws in the state of AZ.

https://azsos.gov/elections/voters

Republicans, fixing problems that don't exist since....well, it's been a long time.

 

[Moonglow]

Again, for those that need a remedial course in reading, here are the current voter registration laws in the state of AZ.

https://azsos.gov/elections/voters

Republicans, fixing problems that don't exist since....well, it's been a long time.

But let's give them a big atta boy pat on the back...

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

But let's give them a big atta boy pat on the back...

Again, I love it when these morons think they've won something.

Just red meat for the feebs. Pathetic.

 

[eagle7-31]

Again, for those that need a remedial course in reading, here are the current voter registration laws in the state of AZ.

https://azsos.gov/elections/voters

Republicans, fixing problems that don't exist since....well, it's been a long time.

When did voting laws matter to Democrats? Hardly ever.

 

[Moonglow]

Again, I love it when these morons think they've won something.

Just red meat for the feebs. Pathetic.

They do sleep on their side and all that knowledge runs out their ear and they have to relearn it the next day.

 

[Moonglow]

When did voting laws matter to Democrats? Hardly ever.

Since voting laws were created.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As it should be you have to prove citizenship to register to vote. Maybe we are approaching common sense. Non-citizens don’t get to vote in anything.

BREAKING: Ninth Circuit Delivers Decision on Citizenship and Voter Registration in Arizona

redstate.com

Kiss of Death for the democrat Party

 

[1srelluc]

Damn, and from the 9th circus no less.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Again, I love it when these morons think they've won something.

Just red meat for the feebs. Pathetic.

It wasn’t a problem yet the pro illegal groups fought it. Fuck off.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Well duh it's a federal law...

Next is voter ID in federal law. And enforcing both. Cry in your unicorn pillow.

 

[OKTexas]

Well duh it's a federal law...

No it's not, idiot.

.

 

[Moonglow]

Next is voter ID in federal law. And enforcing both. Cry in your unicorn pillow.

It will need to be a Constitutional amendment.

 

[ozro]

It will need to be a Constitutional amendment.

No. It has to part of state law. It's kinda why Garland's case got tossed in the 9th

 

[Moonglow]

No it's not, idiot.

.

Better read the Constitution then, derpa...

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The Supreme Court has determined that, under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, states may require a duration of residency as a qualification to vote, but such requirements will be held unconstitutional unless the state can show that the requirement is necessary to serve a compelling interest.1 According to the Court in Dunn v. Blumstein, [t]his exacting test applies because the right to vote is a fundamental political right . . . preservative of all rights, and because a durational residence requirement directly impinges on the exercise of a second fundamental personal right, the right to travel.2 While acknowledging that states have a legitimate and compelling interest in preventing fraud by voters, in Dunn, the Court determined that a one-year residency requirement in a state and a three-month residency requirement in a county was not necessary to further a compelling governmental interest.3 In contrast, the Court in Marston v. Lewis upheld a fifty-day durational residency and voter registration requirement, determining that the law was necessary to serve the State’s important interest in accurate voter lists.4

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-8-6-2/ALDE_00013450/

 

[OKTexas]

Again, I love it when these morons think they've won something.

Just red meat for the feebs. Pathetic.

Hey dumb ass, if it was a given, why was it in court?

.

 

[ozro]

Better read the Constitution then, derpa...

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Wrong part. That's not about elections. The 9th just said, per the Constitution, states are to make election laws in compliance with the Constitution.
It is that simple nate

 

[OKTexas]

Better read the Constitution then, derpa...

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

You might want to check supreme court precedent. Why the hell do you think the House just passed a bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections just recently.

.

 

[ozro]

Yep. It's tougher to cheat now in Arizona.
Why would anyone argue with that unless they want to cheat?