TemplarKormac
Political Atheist
Who was for is now against, who was against is now for. This war that will most likely happen in Syria has exposed the conflicting nature of our politicians and select political aficionados on this board. It is peculiar, that Democrats who for the better of 8 years during the Bush Administration, protested and lamented while he sent us off to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan; would all of a sudden advocate the use of force against the Assad regime for allegedly using chemical weapons against his own people. What is equally and conversely peculiar, is how Republicans who led the charge in a patriotic fervor, off to destroy the terrorists Iraq and Afghanistan for perpetrating the massacre of 3,000 people on 9/11, would all of a sudden oppose any use of force against Syria.
It struck me odd, that John McCain, a staunch pro war progressive Republican, would first advocate the use of force but then oppose a Senate Resolution authorizing force. We have parties that campaigned against war are now advocating it, while the others who campaigned for war are now rejecting the possibility.
So there you have it, a country in limbo. Not a man alive in Washington can make up his mind. Here, in USMB, there exists those of that same stripe. Luckily for the rest of us, we as a whole have made up our minds. We will not support a war in Syria, because we are not like our country, in limbo.
It struck me odd, that John McCain, a staunch pro war progressive Republican, would first advocate the use of force but then oppose a Senate Resolution authorizing force. We have parties that campaigned against war are now advocating it, while the others who campaigned for war are now rejecting the possibility.
So there you have it, a country in limbo. Not a man alive in Washington can make up his mind. Here, in USMB, there exists those of that same stripe. Luckily for the rest of us, we as a whole have made up our minds. We will not support a war in Syria, because we are not like our country, in limbo.
Last edited: