- Banned
- #1
1912 - Men
Pants - Size 34-36
Shirt - Size L
Shoes - Size 11
Women -
Pants - Size 3
Shirt - Size SM
Shoes - Size 3
(Men were up to 7 times the size of a woman)
1960 - Men
Pants - Size 34-36
Shirt - Size L
Shoes - Size 11
(Men are down to about 4 times the size of a woman)
Women -
Pants- Size 6 / 8
Shirt-Size S
Shoes - Size 6
1990 - Men
Pants-Size 34-36
Shirt - Size L
Shoes- Size 11
( Men are down to twice the size of a woman)
Women -
Pants- Size 12
Shirt - Size L
Shoes - Size 8
2010 - Men
Pants - Size 34-36
Shirt - Size L
Shoes - Size 11
(Men can now wear women's clothing directly off the shelf, no special ordering necessary)
Women -
Pants size 16 or 18
Shirt - Size XL
Shoes - Size 10 or 12
This isn't about beating up women...
This is about the diminishing size difference between men and women, with men staying the same while women continue to grow.
Pants - Size 34-36
Shirt - Size L
Shoes - Size 11
Women -
Pants - Size 3
Shirt - Size SM
Shoes - Size 3
(Men were up to 7 times the size of a woman)
1960 - Men
Pants - Size 34-36
Shirt - Size L
Shoes - Size 11
(Men are down to about 4 times the size of a woman)
Women -
Pants- Size 6 / 8
Shirt-Size S
Shoes - Size 6
1990 - Men
Pants-Size 34-36
Shirt - Size L
Shoes- Size 11
( Men are down to twice the size of a woman)
Women -
Pants- Size 12
Shirt - Size L
Shoes - Size 8
2010 - Men
Pants - Size 34-36
Shirt - Size L
Shoes - Size 11
(Men can now wear women's clothing directly off the shelf, no special ordering necessary)
Women -
Pants size 16 or 18
Shirt - Size XL
Shoes - Size 10 or 12
This isn't about beating up women...
This is about the diminishing size difference between men and women, with men staying the same while women continue to grow.