AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 33,525
- 10,046
- 1,340
And changing the internals is tantamount to changing the outcome. I see this logic is hard for you!Made up bullshit, 1% makes just about no difference and if anything slight deficit can motivate people to get off of couch and go vote.
Here is a list of samples from (ridiculously accurate) ABC polling across multiple days of polling in 2012 election:
901. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as (a Democrat), (a Republican), an independent or what?
Democrat Republican Independent Other (vol.) No opinion
11/4/12 LV 35 29 32 3 1
11/3/12 LV 33 29 34 3 1
11/2/12 LV 33 29 34
Washington Post-ABC News Poll (washingtonpost.com)
Note the 2% jump for Democrats from day to day, which ACCURATELY predicted outcome.
Illogical, and with anyone that thinks, a change of 2% would show up in a next day poll, proving these numbers, and it seems that they all do this, is manipulated to anywhere you want to put the resultd@
Why the fuck not? You do realize that polls are statistics based and have margins of error, don't you?
What changing of internals?
IT IS A FUCKING QUESTION IN THE POLL.
I had pointed out internals, not questions!
But are too stupid to understand that those r/d/i numbers come from a question in the poll itself.
Using your EXACT LOGIC for 2012 election ABC polling and results proves you to be full of shit.