Abortion Inc. peddles porn to minors.

Uncensored2008

Libertarian Radical
Feb 8, 2011
110,434
39,503
Planned Parenthood, the multi-billion dollar abortion company, has a new game apparently, promoting pornography for 15 year old girls.


{a Live Action volunteer went undercover at Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains in Denver, Colorado, to see how workers would react to her questions about Bondage and Discipline, Dominance and Submission (BDSM). Unfortunately, this particular employee was all too eager to give the young girl advice about how she and her partner could get more creative in the bedroom. What's particularly striking about the video is not so much the language, but how casually this Planned Parenthood employee discusses sexual bondage games with the young woman.

First, she discussed the different kinds of bondage, such as "whipping" her boyfriend, in an excited tone:

"It can be really fun, you know?"

Then suggested where she could find the necessary items:

“There is tons of sex shops around here. Basically, that’s where they carry different outfits. Like, if you wanna role play, like, a teacher, or a nurse, they have outfits. That would be a good place, for you guys to go together and be able to ask questions together and try new things.”

Other then visit a sex shop, here are a few other tips the employee gave to this 15-year-old girl:

- read "50 Shades of Grey"

- do some internet research on BDSM

- watch porn

- act out porn videos

- don't say "stop," use a "safe word" instead
}

Planned Parenthood Employee to 15-Year-Old Girl: Watch Porn - Cortney O'Brien

$500 million in taxpayer money goes to these scumbags each year.
 
Why is this group sending minors to ask questions about S&M?
 
Why is this group sending minors to ask questions about S&M?

To expose them.

Why are adults encouraging children to watch porn?

Do you support sexual abuse of children, Rati - which is what this is?
 
Unfortunately for the 'porn is naughty' crowd, scientific inquiry reveals things like this,

"...It has been found everywhere scientifically investigated that as pornography has increased in availability, sex crimes have either decreased or not increased."

Title: Pornography, Public Acceptance and Sex Related Crime: A Review

Author: Milton Diamond

Published in: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 32 (2009) 304-314; corrected with Corrigendum IJLP 33 (2010) 197-199

Pacific Center for Sex and Society - Pornography, Public Acceptance and Sex Related Crime: A Review


While a government funded group like PP is out-of-bounds giving such advice to minors (assuming it actually did, seems this story only exists on conservative websites which seems odd,) the general sentiment is scientificly valid. And claims to the contrary are not.
 
Last edited:
Why is this group sending minors to ask questions about S&M?

To expose them.

Why are adults encouraging children to watch porn?

Do you support sexual abuse of children, Rati - which is what this is?
Most of these exposés turn out to be untrue so I'll wait for a less hysterical source.

If you don't want kids exposed to this shit, then don't send them to do it.

You really are an idiot.
 
And googling "does pornography harm children" the scholarly answers are "no." Just as violent movies and videogames don't contribute to real-world acts of violence, viewing pornography does not trnaslate into real-world acting out. There's only so many ways two people can have sex, that the ways they do is in porn is incidental and not reflective of people watched porn so now have sex imitating what they saw. Porns been a part of every culture since we developed writing. Only recently though have some attempted to portray it in a negative light to which I'd say any negative associations with porn you might have were brought in with you.
 
Unfortunately for the 'porn is naughty' crowd, scientific inquiry reveals things like this,

"...It has been found everywhere scientifically investigated that as pornography has increased in availability, sex crimes have either decreased or not increased."

Title: Pornography, Public Acceptance and Sex Related Crime: A Review

Author: Milton Diamond

Published in: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 32 (2009) 304-314; corrected with Corrigendum IJLP 33 (2010) 197-199

Pacific Center for Sex and Society - Pornography, Public Acceptance and Sex Related Crime: A Review


While a government funded group like PP is out-of-bounds giving such advice to minors (assuming it actually did, seems this story only exists on conservative websites which seems odd,) the general sentiment is scientificly valid. And claims to the contrary are not.

So, you promote giving porn to children?

What about having children participate in porn, do you support that as well?
 
I watched the video, sounds like a girl who made clear she is already sexual active with her boyfriend asking questions about kinky stuff and getting answers. That is was sex education is, and sex education is a good thing.

However I believe that nurse was out of line recommending she go to an adult shop with her boyfriend, as I'm pretty sure most cities have municipal codes restricting entrance to minors and you don't want her curiosity getting her into legal trouble.
 
Most of these exposés turn out to be untrue so I'll wait for a less hysterical source.

If you don't want kids exposed to this shit, then don't send them to do it.

You really are an idiot.

Taxpayer dollars are funding this.

You are a partisan hack, with no ability to reason. But this is easily equal to the Priest Sex Scandals.

The real question is how strongly leftists will defend giving children porn?
 
And googling "does pornography harm children" the scholarly answers are "no." Just as violent movies and videogames don't contribute to real-world acts of violence, viewing pornography does not trnaslate into real-world acting out. There's only so many ways two people can have sex, that the ways they do is in porn is incidental and not reflective of people watched porn so now have sex imitating what they saw. Porns been a part of every culture since we developed writing. Only recently though have some attempted to portray it in a negative light to which I'd say any negative associations with porn you might have were brought in with you.

Well, there we go. The left sees porn as family entertainment.

What a surprise.

Dude, it's not that you're a pervert - oh wait...
 
Seems like another Breitbart/O'Keefe hit piece

I'll wait for the truth to come out
 
Most of these exposés turn out to be untrue so I'll wait for a less hysterical source.

If you don't want kids exposed to this shit, then don't send them to do it.

You really are an idiot.

Taxpayer dollars are funding this.

You are a partisan hack, with no ability to reason. But this is easily equal to the Priest Sex Scandals.

The real question is how strongly leftists will defend giving children porn?
I don't support it at all.

Did her parents sign off on this? Why would they allow her to do it and why would some other adult send her to do it? This is extremely sick.
 
I don't have a problem with minors viewing pornography no. With some conditions. Have seen some I don't support adults viewing nevermind kids. But not all porn is the junk being made today under the 'gonzo' category. Used to be some very good stuff being made in Europe in the 70s and first half of the 80s. Round about 1985 porn went to hell in a hulahoop.

I don't support children being featured in porn no. Not real ones at any rate. Drawn or computer graphics intending to be children I don't have a problem with since then it's basically a matter of "how well drawn it too well drawn?" If "stick figures" are ok then why not something drawn also by hand by a superior and gifted artist? Are we really proposing to go through all the fine art museums of the country and remove everything from the Renaissance that shows naked children because the quality is 'too good?' If not, then picking solely on proper "porn" is selective enforcement which I"m against as stated in other threads. Laws which don't apply evenly and equally shouldn't be laws.

Federal law already backs me up on this btw.

18 U.S. Code § 2256 - Definitions for chapter | LII / Legal Information Institute

Federal 'child porn' definition says,

(11) the term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.

In other words, anime/hentai is legal at least federally. Actual human being-involved content isn't. But just because a work is "photo realistic" doesnt' mean it's illegal as is often the case with the latest '3d cgi' type stuff.

Been blowing human beings apart via computer graphics for some time now. If we're ok showing that, then showing something far more positive as with sex seems sensible. And study after study has shown porn isn't harmful to anyone. Quite the opposite as evidenced by similar research into nudism/naturism and its effects on children. It's beneficial, not harmful.
 
Well, there we go. The left sees porn as family entertainment.

You are a partisan hack

Debunking+Atheists+IronyMeter.gif
 
Most of these exposés turn out to be untrue so I'll wait for a less hysterical source.

If you don't want kids exposed to this shit, then don't send them to do it.

You really are an idiot.

Taxpayer dollars are funding this.

You are a partisan hack, with no ability to reason. But this is easily equal to the Priest Sex Scandals.

The real question is how strongly leftists will defend giving children porn?
I don't support it at all.

Did her parents sign off on this? Why would they allow her to do it and why would some other adult send her to do it? This is extremely sick.




unkoshergoon already did a thread on this last month...



http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/359458-planned-parenthood-continues-to-target-underaged-girls.html#post9258901




Planned Parenthood: BDSM advocate no longer counseling teens


Planned Parenthood distanced itself from the advice dispensed at its clinic. They rejected the idea that this is a normal PP counseling session and said that the employee no longer worked for the organization...
 
Taxpayer dollars are funding this.

You are a partisan hack, with no ability to reason. But this is easily equal to the Priest Sex Scandals.

The real question is how strongly leftists will defend giving children porn?
I don't support it at all.

Did her parents sign off on this? Why would they allow her to do it and why would some other adult send her to do it? This is extremely sick.




unkoshergoon already did a thread on this last month...



http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/359458-planned-parenthood-continues-to-target-underaged-girls.html#post9258901




Planned Parenthood: BDSM advocate no longer counseling teens


Planned Parenthood distanced itself from the advice dispensed at its clinic. They rejected the idea that this is a normal PP counseling session and said that the employee no longer worked for the organization...

Ah, so the person was fired and Eunuch2008 wants to pretend otherwise. One wonders what his sick need to bring this up again stems from.
 
I don't support it at all.

Did her parents sign off on this? Why would they allow her to do it and why would some other adult send her to do it? This is extremely sick.




unkoshergoon already did a thread on this last month...



http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/359458-planned-parenthood-continues-to-target-underaged-girls.html#post9258901




Planned Parenthood: BDSM advocate no longer counseling teens


Planned Parenthood distanced itself from the advice dispensed at its clinic. They rejected the idea that this is a normal PP counseling session and said that the employee no longer worked for the organization...

Ah, so the person was fired and Eunuch2008 wants to pretend otherwise. One wonders what his sick need to bring this up again stems from.



not sure if it's the same incident but the gist is the same... this is not standard policy for PP and PP denounces and fires individuals who are found to have stepped over the line with that type of advice...
 

Ah, so the person was fired and Eunuch2008 wants to pretend otherwise. One wonders what his sick need to bring this up again stems from.



not sure if it's the same incident but the gist is the same... this is not standard policy for PP and PP denounces and fires individuals who are found to have stepped over the line with that type of advice...

It wouldn't surprise me to learn that kgrill and Eunuch2008 worked at PP as saboteurs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top