AG nominee Pam Bondi has said that the bad prosecutors at the DOJ will be prosecuted

[Mac1958]

That'll teach everyone not to hold Trump and his cult accountable!

 

[AntonToo]

So they didn't prosecute Trump as you claimed.

..wtf? What I said was Jack Smith prosecuted Trump with operational independance from Garland's DOJ.

 

[AntonToo]

AG Garland appointed Smith to prosecute Biden's political rival.

BECAUSE TRUMP PROVABLY BROKE THE LAW, not because he happened to be a political rival dum dum.

Trump's political allie and his own rightwinger Attorney General Bill Barr stated clearly that Trump was culpable in the criminal charges against him in J6 and Documents cases.

AG Garland also appointed special prosecutor for Biden's own son, prosecuted and convicted Democrats, yet somehow it's ONLY Trump's prosecution that gets any tracking in your head.

Wise up.

 

[boevans]

how do you know not trump? It was so common, they went after the boss's own son!

Curried Goats is whipping you down the alley, bro.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump was convicted in three cases of breaking the law.

 

[AntonToo]

No, a recipient of a Presidential pardon does not have to have been convicted of a crime. A Presidential pardon can be granted to someone who has been convicted, charged, or even to someone who has not yet been formally accused of a crime. The pardon serves to forgive the individual for any federal offenses they may have committed, effectively removing any legal penalties associated with those offenses.

A notable example is President Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon. Nixon had not been formally charged with any crimes related to the Watergate scandal at the time of the pardon.

All true, but lets note that Ford's very broad pardon was never chellenged in court.

 

[struth]

Curried Goats is whipping you down the alley, bro.

Weirdo

 

[struth]

..wtf? What I said was Jack Smith prosecuted Trump with operational independance from Garland's DOJ.

Jack smith was illegally appointed, specifically to political prosecute trump.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

All true, but lets note that Ford's very broad pardon was never chellenged in court.

Does not matter. Never challenged means no opposition.

 

[boevans]

Weirdo

You love being whipped. Weirdo.

 

[boevans]

Jack smith was illegally appointed, specifically to political prosecute trump.

No, he was not.

 

[AntonToo]

Does not matter. Never challenged means no opposition.

I'm just saying it wouldn't nescessarily stand up to legal scrutiny if at some point there would be oppositon willing to pursue it.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Sure, it would.

 

[struth]

No, he was not.

I get not having respect for the rule of law is the crazy out of the dembot cult...but the Court ruled he was illegally appointed

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/672/united-states-v-trump/

 

[struth]

You love being whipped. Weirdo.

No, it's weird you think I am getting whipped by a guy that claims he knowingly voted for a senile man.

 

[boevans]

No, it's weird you think I am getting whipped by a guy that claims he knowingly voted for a senile man.

You are so confused.

 

[scruffy]

..wtf? What I said was Jack Smith prosecuted Trump with operational independance from Garland's DOJ.

lmao

Hey, I got some nice land in Florida I'd like to sell you.

And a bridge, got one of those too.

 

[WEATHER53]

Bottom line they still have to prove that prosecutors did not follow the law. That there was no case against Trump.

So now they are going to rehash on the Trump crimes. So what Trump can beat women in a political race. It also seems that he can sexually assault them and claim that they are lying.

So grabbing them by the P is okay

Cheating on his wife is okay

keeping classified government records is okay

OKay so prosecutors lose their job , hey now they can sue the government for doing their job.

The specifics of the targeting of Trump will come out and Dems don’t want that

 

[struth]

You are so confused.

I am not the one voting for senile people

 

[Curried Goats]

No, it's weird you think I am getting whipped by a guy that claims he knowingly voted for a senile man.

When you have to pretend I said one thing when I actually said I'm not privy to Bidens medical condition, is what makes you an obvious loser. Why not try attacking the things I actually say? How afraid of me are you?