Again, Nature handles Climates.

Right in front of your eyes is your solution. TREES. Even Bill Gates promotes planting millions more trees. Trees do no harm. They capture Carbon and over time deposit it in the soil. Can't lose at all. No need for Windmills or Solar panels. Those break over time anyway. Trees do not require laws. Trees are all over nature.
Now you have the solution. Care to talk about it?


There's more money in cutting down trees than in planting new ones or leaving them be. Therefore you are asking for monetary hits to be taken as a price for protecting the climate, same thing as every other AGW activist is doing with their own preferred strategies.
 
There's more money in cutting down trees than in planting new ones or leaving them be. Therefore you are asking for monetary hits to be taken as a price for protecting the climate, same thing as every other AGW activist is doing with their own preferred strategies.
Small trees are not expensive. Not to those who tell us they are in charge of climate. When they whine scientists are in charge of climate, they can't name any who really are.
 
Small trees are not expensive. Not to those who tell us they are in charge of climate. When they whine scientists are in charge of climate, they can't name any who really are.
What a strange comment. Anyways, there isn't any entity planting any significant level of trees to combat deforestation all over the world. Odds are if you try to convince organizations to do so, they'll call you a left-wing climate kook trying to hurt their bottom line.
 
What a strange comment. Anyways, there isn't any entity planting any significant level of trees to combat deforestation all over the world. Odds are if you try to convince organizations to do so, they'll call you a left-wing climate kook trying to hurt their bottom line.
I have no plans of the sort you mention. They don't need to call me more than a man.
 

Forum List

Back
Top