Agents Irate Clinton Not Charged

[HereWeGoAgain]

Oh really? Than explain why the FBI as a whole is pissed at Comey for letting the hildabeast skate?

As a whole, it is not. And it is no suprise that the FBI has some hot headed authoritarians who don't understand simple legal arguments.

Gee you must have missed the outrage...or you're just a partisan hack.

 

[HnL]

As a whole, it is not. And it is no suprise that the FBI has some hot headed authoritarians who don't understand simple legal arguments.

Gee you must have missed the outrage...or you're just a partisan hack.

There are 35,000+ FBI agents, and probably as many who are retired.

It would be shocking if there were none of them who are Clinton haters who spoke out. Nonetheless, the notion that it is a significant number is garbage.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

As a whole, it is not. And it is no suprise that the FBI has some hot headed authoritarians who don't understand simple legal arguments.

Gee you must have missed the outrage...or you're just a partisan hack.

There are 35,000+ FBI agents, and probably as many who are retired.

It would be shocking if there were none of them who are Clinton haters who spoke out. Nonetheless, the notion that it is a significant number is garbage.

She clearly broke the law,and many others went to jail that did far less.
hillary is a crook,we all know it,and wikileaks just confirms what we already knew.

Oh and by the way...you look ridiculous defending the indefensible.

 

[HnL]

She clearly broke the law,

She clearly did not, dumbass, and that is why she has not been charged.

And if you think so, why don't you have a mock trial. Try to get a competent prosecutor to prosecute the case (I assure you neither Giuliani or Christie would be willing to do such a thing). And let Hillary supporters pick a defense attorney and someone to play Hillary. Then get a panel of retired judges to be the jury.

The mock trial could be a ratings star.

But it wouldn't be. Because you have no case. And trying to put together, even a mock trial, would make that rather obvious.

But since you will never do such a thing, you can keep peddling mob rule and baseless derision of 230 years of jurisprudence in the greatest country in the world.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

She clearly broke the law,

She clearly did not, dumbass, and that is why she has not been charged.

And if you think so, why don't you have a mock trial. Try to get a competent prosecutor to prosecute the case (I assure you neither Giuliani or Christie would be willing to do such a thing). And let Hillary supporters pick a defense attorney and someone to play Hillary. Then get a panel of retired judges to be the jury.

The mock trial could be a ratings star.

But it wouldn't be. Because you have no case. And trying to put together, even a mock trial, would make that rather obvious.

But since you will never do such a thing, you can keep peddling mob rule and baseless derision of 230 years of jurisprudence in the greatest country in the world.

She clearly did.
And Comey said as much.
So tell me genius,where does intent fit in on this case?

 

[HnL]

And Comey said as much.

Guess what, genius, he said he found nothing that could be successfully prosecuted.

And guess what the FBI’s mission is?

It is to investigate CRIMES. It is NOT to investigate people.

You want it to be like a banana republic, where law enforcement is tasked with investigating individuals until they find something that they can charge the individual with, no matter how minor or ridiculous.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And Comey said as much.

Guess what, genius, he said he found nothing that could be successfully prosecuted.

And guess what the FBI’s mission is?

It is to investigate CRIMES. It is NOT to investigate people.

You want it to be like a banana republic, where law enforcement is tasked with investigating individuals until they find something that they can charge the individual with, no matter how minor or ridiculous.

Dude STFU...if you cant be honest we're done here.

 

[HnL]

Dude STFU...if you cant be honest we're done here.

It is the honest to God truth that Hillary is not a criminal.

You imaging her as a criminal doesn't actually make her one.

 

[whitehall]

Let's face it folks, it ain't your fathers FBI and federal cops are just drones who work for the administration. If the Feds weren't fictionalized by Hollywood and supported by the left wing media it's possible that Americans might be a little bit annoyed about the FBI's failure to arrest the Boston Marathon bombers before they went radical and the very strange case of the FBI dropping the investigation on the Florida terrorist just before he went viral.Too bad all the investigative reporters retired or maybe the media is a propaganda arm of the administration which includes the FBI and the ATF.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Dude STFU...if you cant be honest we're done here.

It is the honest to God truth that Hillary is not a criminal.

You imaging her as a criminal doesn't actually make her one.

:
Shall we school this liberal fucktard...

First lets review the relevant Statute:

18 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 101 - RECORDS AND REPORTS
Sec. 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

*****************

The relevant section is (b). This section does not require INTENT.

Lets review:
1. Clinton had control and possession.
2. The 33,000 emails were under subpoena to retain.
3. Clinton was the ONLY person who could authorize their destruction, in violation of court order.
4. BleachBit (a bit data scrambling program) was used to destroy the documents.
5. Among the documents on the server were 130 top secret and special access documents, in violation of the Espionage Act and this title.

Wikileaks exposed that Obama was using Hillary's server to communicate with her. And that this was the reason BleachBit was used, to keep Obama's involvement secret. Obama has now invoked executive privliage to keep those emails secret.

The use of BleachBit is prima-facia evidence, of intent, to destroy government records. NOW section (a) is in play..

Comey screwed the pooch and is about to get indicted for dereliction of duty.

People have been sent to prison for years for just one page of classified material.. This is a case a brain dead lawyer can win.. The evidence is massive and clear intent by the provable destruction of government records.

 

[HnL]

Dude STFU...if you cant be honest we're done here.

It is the honest to God truth that Hillary is not a criminal.

You imaging her as a criminal doesn't actually make her one.

:
Shall we school this liberal fucktard...

First lets review the relevant Statute:
18 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 101 - RECORDS AND REPORTS
Sec. 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

*****************

The relevant section is (b). This section does not require INTENT. All

Dipshit, she didn't WILLFULLY do anything wrong. She did not conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, or falsify anything.

Lesson 1: emails are electronic records represented schematically as an exceedingly long list of zeros and ones. A “draft” isn't an email. Ergo, there is always at least two digital copies of an email.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

She clearly broke the law,

She clearly did not, dumbass, and that is why she has not been charged.

And if you think so, why don't you have a mock trial. Try to get a competent prosecutor to prosecute the case (I assure you neither Giuliani or Christie would be willing to do such a thing). And let Hillary supporters pick a defense attorney and someone to play Hillary. Then get a panel of retired judges to be the jury.

The mock trial could be a ratings star.

But it wouldn't be. Because you have no case. And trying to put together, even a mock trial, would make that rather obvious.

But since you will never do such a thing, you can keep peddling mob rule and baseless derision of 230 years of jurisprudence in the greatest country in the world.

She clearly did.
And Comey said as much.
So tell me genius,where does intent fit in on this case?

So franko laughs because he doesnt have an answer.

 

[Spare_change]

“Agents Irate Clinton Not Charged”

And?

Who cares what they think – it’s not their job or responsibility to decide who should or should not be charged with a crime.

It’s solely their responsibility to investigate, collect evidence, and submit the findings for a determination as to whether charges are warranted.

That a few partisan agents don’t like the fact that the evidence didn’t support charges against Clinton is irrelevant and shameful, as they clearly don’t understand their roles and responsibilities, and are performing their duties in bad faith.

There's only one flaw (that's a lie --- there's several) ... it is NOT the responsibility of the FBI to determine who is charged with a crime. That is the responsibility of the Department of Justice, as represented by the local federal attorney.

Comey was a political foil --- he did exactly what his masters told him to do. He took the heat so that you didn't know you'd been hoodwinked.

 

[Spare_change]

you asked for an example. You got one !

No. you gave me someone convicted of murder. So I don't believe you about the other alleged conviction and don't really care, since the issue was the murder that you FAILED to mention.

Furthermore, dumbass, Hillary wasn't in the military.

Let stupidity reign supreme ... you look good in your robe and LITTLE scepter (maybe if you buttoned your robe, people wouldn't laugh)

 

[Spare_change]

Dude STFU...if you cant be honest we're done here.

It is the honest to God truth that Hillary is not a criminal.

You imaging her as a criminal doesn't actually make her one.

:
Shall we school this liberal fucktard...

First lets review the relevant Statute:
18 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 101 - RECORDS AND REPORTS
Sec. 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

*****************

The relevant section is (b). This section does not require INTENT. All

Dipshit, she didn't WILLFULLY do anything wrong. She did not conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, or falsify anything.

Lesson 1: emails are electronic records represented schematically as an exceedingly long list of zeros and ones. A “draft” isn't an email. Ergo, there is always at least two digital copies of an email.

Willfully????? What the hell does 'willfully' have to do with it?

 

[Spare_change]

And Comey said as much.

Guess what, genius, he said he found nothing that could be successfully prosecuted.

And guess what the FBI’s mission is?

It is to investigate CRIMES. It is NOT to investigate people.

You want it to be like a banana republic, where law enforcement is tasked with investigating individuals until they find something that they can charge the individual with, no matter how minor or ridiculous.

No ... actually, that's not what he said. That's how the media twisted what he said. Go back and read the transcript, and then review the testimony before Congress.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Dude STFU...if you cant be honest we're done here.

It is the honest to God truth that Hillary is not a criminal.

You imaging her as a criminal doesn't actually make her one.

:
Shall we school this liberal fucktard...

First lets review the relevant Statute:
18 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 101 - RECORDS AND REPORTS
Sec. 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

*****************

The relevant section is (b). This section does not require INTENT. All

Dipshit, she didn't WILLFULLY do anything wrong. She did not conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, or falsify anything.

Lesson 1: emails are electronic records represented schematically as an exceedingly long list of zeros and ones. A “draft” isn't an email. Ergo, there is always at least two digital copies of an email.

LOL.. Electronic records ARE STILL GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS..

You really are an ignorant fucktard.. Why did Obama invoke executive privilege? Why did Hillary use Bleachbit to scramble all copies of those records?

I have over 26 years experience in Law enforcement, Investigations, and incarcerations of criminals.. This woman should be in jail!

 

[HnL]

Let stupidity reign supreme ... you look good in your robe and LITTLE scepter (maybe if you buttoned your robe, people wouldn't laugh)

You do realize that all the public information on your murderer doesn't have a peep about the Newsweek magazine you referenced.

But let's pretend it is somewhat similar (which it is not — emails aren't anything like a paper document), you said, "tell that to the people who were convicted..."

You have one case, and "people" is more than one person. And the only evidence on the one person is your word on it.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Dude STFU...if you cant be honest we're done here.

It is the honest to God truth that Hillary is not a criminal.

You imaging her as a criminal doesn't actually make her one.

:
Shall we school this liberal fucktard...

First lets review the relevant Statute:
18 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 101 - RECORDS AND REPORTS
Sec. 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

*****************

The relevant section is (b). This section does not require INTENT. All

Dipshit, she didn't WILLFULLY do anything wrong. She did not conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, or falsify anything.

Lesson 1: emails are electronic records represented schematically as an exceedingly long list of zeros and ones. A “draft” isn't an email. Ergo, there is always at least two digital copies of an email.

Use of anything to destroy or hide evidence is intent... My Gawd your so damn stupid!

 

[HnL]

Dude STFU...if you cant be honest we're done here.

It is the honest to God truth that Hillary is not a criminal.

You imaging her as a criminal doesn't actually make her one.

:
Shall we school this liberal fucktard...

First lets review the relevant Statute:
18 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 101 - RECORDS AND REPORTS
Sec. 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

*****************

The relevant section is (b). This section does not require INTENT. All

Dipshit, she didn't WILLFULLY do anything wrong. She did not conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, or falsify anything.

Lesson 1: emails are electronic records represented schematically as an exceedingly long list of zeros and ones. A “draft” isn't an email. Ergo, there is always at least two digital copies of an email.

LOL.. Electronic records ARE STILL GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS..

You really are an ignorant fucktard.. Why did Obama invoke executive privilege? Why did Hillary use Bleachbit to scramble all copies of those records?

I have over 26 years experience in Law enforcement, Investigations, and incarcerations of criminals.. This woman should be in jail!

Private emails are not GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS.

And given how unreliable digital storage is, it is insane to believe that important sensitive information is only on one server, whether that one server is in a bathroom or in the State Department.

And every state department email received by Hillary had to go through a state department server. Soooo, we should have a copy of EVERY FUCKING ONE OF THEM.