There is so much out there about how scuzzy dimocrap scum are, but the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM just won't do it's job, because -- They're part of it. And if a politician says it, it's shrugged off as 'poitics'
Here's something Ace gathered up. I've been saying this for a long, LONG time but he's more eloquent than I am. But..... Who isn't
Antifa, BLM, etc, etc ad nauseam. The Free Palestine movement. All bought and paid for.
People -- You need to understand just how dangerous, murderous and scummy the entire dimocrap scum apparatus is before it's too late. Once they gain the power they so cravenly desire, it will be too late. That is their goal.
Rich Democrat Donors Are Financing a Terror Campaign Against Tesla and American Citizens Generally -- Will We Fight Them? Or Will We Let Them All Go Free As We Did With Barack Obama's Pals in the Weather Underground?
ace.mu.nu
Yesterday I mentioned the classic terrorist arrangement, whereby a terror group works hand-in-hand with a "political wing." The political wing allegedly does not conduct terror attacks -- it's a group of people with relatively clean records.
But the "political wing," while claiming to be distinct from their terrorist partners, is always there to negotiate on behalf of the terrorists, making demands in exchange for peace. The terrorist wing provides the Stick, the political wing is there to collect the Carrots.
Black September, the Palestinian terror group behind the Olympics massacre, had a front group called the PLO you might have heard of. The Irish Republican Army had the supposedly non-violent Sinn Fein.
One side of the organization wears black hats and sets off bombs and fires. The other side wears white hats -- or gray hats, at least -- and negotiates to make the bombs and fires stop.
Christopher Rufo and my friend David Reaboi have written about the exact same arrangement in today's left.
The terrorists pretend to be separate from the "activists" and political/donor network of the Democrat Party.
In fact, they're just two claws of the same beast.
How "Tesla Takedown" Activists Fool the Public
The campaign against Elon Musk's company is hardly a grassroots movement.
..
A closer look suggests that Tesla is the latest target of an activist and organizing ecosystem that the Left has built over decades. That infrastructure manufactures, amplifies, and strategically uses protests and "direct actions" to force concessions or policy change. These direct actions range from nonviolent (sit-ins or flash mobs) to violent (arson, harassment, or even assassination), all meant to focus attention through the drama of real-world confrontation. The goal is to bypass the normal channels of democratic decision-making, obtaining desired ends through minoritarian pressure campaigns.
It would be impossible, however, to find a single person or entity directing both the protests and the violence.
Rather, the two are linked by the concept of "diversity of tactics," an activist doctrine that holds that a movement should welcome the use of coercion methods as part of the whole range of the radicalization spectrum--from conventional, nonviolent marches to riots, property destruction, and violence--within their strategic program.
Diversity of tactics encourages activists to take advantage of a clever ruse: the public-facing flank of the movement presents the image of nonviolent resistance, while the behind-the-scenes infrastructure supports and occasionally engages in violence. One creates strategic opportunities for the other, with any connection hidden behind a veil of plausible deniability.
