Analogies

[EvilCat Breath]

LOL!!

Co2 science lesson

Their theory is that increasing atmospheric Co2 would warm the atmosphere. We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps - satellites and balloons. What did THE DATA say before being FUDGED in 2005...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"


Theory - increasing atmospheric Co2 warms atmosphere

The actual DATA - NOPE

Science says THEORY REJECTED

"The science" "climate science" "DEI science" "CRT science" "Math is racist science" says FUDGE THE DATA and claim "warming" that DOES NOT EXIST


Co2 does NOTHING

Sincerely,

highly correlated satellite and balloon data

CO2 is the foundational building block of all life on earth. When verifiable idiots like John Kerry talk about removing all CO2 the ignorance is bone chilling. It means the death of every bush, tree, cactus and ocean algae.

 

[Crick]

Annual deaths globally from Malaria was at historic lows due to controlling mosquito populations with DDT. Around 200,000 per year.

Since banning DDT in the 1970’s, deaths due to mosquito-borne Malaria has skyrocketed to millions every year.

While deaths due to DDT exposure remain constant at ZERO before and after the ban.

I trust you realize that the mention of DDT in the OP was as an analogy. DDT was a massive threat to bird life.

CO2 is the foundational building block of all life on earth.

All plant life which are the source of all oxygen. Did you think the world's scientists were unaware of that?

When verifiable idiots like John Kerry talk about removing all CO2 the ignorance is bone chilling.

Show us such a statement from John Kerry.

It means the death of every bush, tree, cactus and ocean algae.

Which is why I am absolutely certain John Kerry never suggested any such thing.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I trust you realize that the mention of DDT in the OP was as an analogy. DDT was a massive threat to bird life.

All plant life which are the source of all oxygen. Did you think the world's scientists were unaware of that?

Show us such a statement from John Kerry.

Which is why I am absolutely certain John Kerry never suggested any such thing.

John Kerry’s Climate Warning: 'Even If We Get To Net Zero, We Need Carbon Removal'

The little-noticed remark came during a finance session of President Biden's big Earth Day climate summit.

www.huffpost.com

I hope the scientists are aware of that. Can they be paid to say something else? Maybe so.

Kerry promoting carbon capture

John Kerry Is Optimistic About Fighting Climate Change After COP28

We spoke to Kerry, the special presidential envoy for climate, about the conference’s historic agreement, which promises to end oil, gas, and coal use by 2050

www.outsideonline.com

Where are all the scientists telling Kerry he is full of crap.

 

[Crick]

John Kerry’s Climate Warning: 'Even If We Get To Net Zero, We Need Carbon Removal'

The little-noticed remark came during a finance session of President Biden's big Earth Day climate summit.

www.huffpost.com

I hope the scientists are aware of that. Can they be paid to say something else? Maybe so.

Kerry promoting carbon capture

John Kerry Is Optimistic About Fighting Climate Change After COP28

We spoke to Kerry, the special presidential envoy for climate, about the conference’s historic agreement, which promises to end oil, gas, and coal use by 2050

www.outsideonline.com

Where are all the scientists telling Kerry he is full of crap.

I don't know about the scientists, but here is the forum poster telling YOU you're full of crap.

If we were to achieve net zero this very instant, the atmosphere would still be comprised of 420 ppm CO2. What we need is atmospheric CO2 at 280 ppm and ocean pH back up 0.1 pH. There is NOTHING wrong with what Kerry said. The problem is your science ignorance, as was always the case.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I don't know about the scientists, but here is the forum poster telling YOU you're full of crap.

If we were to achieve net zero this very instant, the atmosphere would still be comprised of 420 ppm CO2. What we need is atmospheric CO2 at 280 ppm and ocean pH back up 0.1 pH. There is NOTHING wrong with what Kerry said. The problem is your science ignorance, as was always the case.

What we need is atmospheric CO2 at 280 ppm and ocean pH back up 0.1 pH.

Why?

 

[Crick]

What we need is atmospheric CO2 at 280 ppm and ocean pH back up 0.1 pH.

Why?

Because that's where it had been for 14 million years - when almost all life on this planet evolved.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because that's where it had been for 14 million years - when almost all life on this planet evolved.

We're a very resilient species.
We can easily survive a little warmer, a little more acidic and more CO2.

Feel free to spend all your kid's inheritance on dumping Tums into the ocean.

 

[jc456]

I talk to people almost every day on this forum that think global warming is a hoax. People like you. And I find they don't know the science or they simply reject it for no reason other than it conflicts with their preconceived, unsupportable notions.

You can’t explain the science, why?

 

[Crick]

We're a very resilient species.
We can easily survive a little warmer, a little more acidic and more CO2.

Feel free to spend all your kid's inheritance on dumping Tums into the ocean.

And how might you know that since neither our species nor any of our ancestors back to kenyapithecus has ever experienced such conditions?

PS: here is Kenyapithecus. Note that they have not yet come down from the trees.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And how might you know that since neither our species nor any of our ancestors back to kenyapithecus has ever experienced such conditions?

PS: here is Kenyapithecus. Note that they have not yet come down from the trees.

View attachment 1004484

Is the extra CO2 going to drive your great grandkids back into the trees?

 

[Crick]

Is the extra CO2 going to drive your great grandkids back into the trees?

Your dodging the question. Given that humanity has never experienced anything like what we're starting to go through right now, how can you know we'll be able to cope with it?

 

[fncceo]

DDT was a massive threat to bird life.

And who cares if we kill 100,000,000 million humans from Malaria … as long as we saved a few birds.

 

[ding]

Your dodging the question. Given that humanity has never experienced anything like what we're starting to go through right now, how can you know we'll be able to cope with it?

It's a trace amount of a relatively weak GHG. I think we'll survive.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I don't know about the scientists, but here is the forum poster telling YOU you're full of crap.

If we were to achieve net zero this very instant, the atmosphere would still be comprised of 420 ppm CO2. What we need is atmospheric CO2 at 280 ppm and ocean pH back up 0.1 pH. There is NOTHING wrong with what Kerry said. The problem is your science ignorance, as was always the case.

Why didn't you just come out and say there is no form of scientific statements or evidence you would accept?

 

[ding]

What we need is atmospheric CO2 at 280 ppm and ocean pH back up 0.1 pH. There is NOTHING wrong with what Kerry said. The problem is your science ignorance, as was always the case.

You mean besides threatening all life with too low of atmospheric CO2 at the next glacial event?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Your dodging the question. Given that humanity has never experienced anything like what we're starting to go through right now, how can you know we'll be able to cope with it?

We've never experienced it before, but we're a very resilient species.

Sorry that your descendants will have to live in trees.

Maybe, if you didn't waste so much money on CO2 reduction, they'd be able to afford homes?

 

[EMH]

I don't know about the scientists, but here is the forum poster telling YOU you're full of crap.

If we were to achieve net zero this very instant, the atmosphere would still be comprised of 420 ppm CO2. What we need is atmospheric CO2 at 280 ppm and ocean pH back up 0.1 pH. There is NOTHING wrong with what Kerry said. The problem is your science ignorance, as was always the case.

And then there is the issue of the highly correlated satellite and balloon data, that documents that increasing Co2 did NOTHING, NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE where the Co2 is...

 

[Crick]

Why didn't you just come out and say there is no form of scientific statements or evidence you would accept?

Because that is not what I wished to say. What I could have said outright, since you seemed to have missed the point, was that you don't seem to have known the definition of the term "net zero".

 

[ding]

you don't seem to have known the definition of the term "net zero".

Reaching 100% carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035?