Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Any debate on global warming now OVER!?
- Thread starter skookerasbil
- Start date
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 18,528
- 11,581
- 2,138
You refute theory with theory, fact with fact. You don't come up with a theory and force others to retort with factual, sourced data.
What an idiot. You validate/refute theory with DATA.
For example, if your theory is that increasing atmospheric Co2 would warm the atmosphere, you would notice we have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons....
THE DATA
Key claim against global warming evaporates
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.
www.nbcnews.com
satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.
Translation from NBC = for more than 3 decades, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere during a period of rising Co2
and then that data was FUDGED in 2005 with laughable BS....
SCIENCE SAYS THEORY REJECTED
"climate science" says FUDGE THE DATA and claim "warming" that DOES NOT EXIST
Because he's crazy.Why does anyone go someplace they've never been before?
That has nothing to do with isotopes, and isotopes have ZERO EVIDENCE supporting that they are a reliable source of ancient temperature.
You are an employee of the Co2 FRAUD and your job is to troll, shout down, lie, obstruct, and push easily discredited fudge fraud in order to PRESERVE YOUR JOB by preventing the actual truth from coming out....
This truth....
Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?
The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...www.usmessageboard.com
Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...
What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...
The warmers need to explain the Arctic Circle's ice pattern, and how Co2 is responsible...
The map is clear. 7% of Earth ice is on Greenland. Why is there ice on Greenland south of the Arctic Circle, and no ice north of the Arctic Circle on Alaska? Co2 and sun do not explain this. The only explanation is the Greenland is within 600 miles of the pole at the top, and hence...
The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago
McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure... We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old...
How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?
This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...
and you and the Co2 FRAUD cannot refute one word of any of that...
How so?Goobledegook.
It's all Greek to me.How so?
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #509
How hysterical are the comments from the climate crusaders on this thread? 
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #511
Yup, the "debate is over."
Skookerasbil LOST.
AGW Won.
He Started the Wrongest thread EVER made here with his NINE Year running "Skeptics are Winning" thread in 2013-2022.
Nailed it!
Astonishing Call in 2013!
`
Post it up again........
.....want to see if it's posted up 50 times by the time this thread reaches 50 pages.....yuk...yuk....Go........go........go.............this is going to 80K posts like the 2013 one!!
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #512
Hey JC.......Tommy......Frank et.al.........
Wanna laugh?
npj Climate Action volume 3, Article number: 36 (2024)
For the AGW crowd..........so much lOsiNg.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00126-0
Wanna laugh?
The importance of distinguishing climate science from climate activism
Ulf Büntgennpj Climate Action volume 3, Article number: 36 (2024)
For the AGW crowd..........so much lOsiNg.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00126-0
Could not find any confirmation that Surface Air Pressure would rise as ice melts. Got a link? (No fudged data please.)and so if there was an ongoing net ice melt on Earth now, which there is NOT, Surface Air Pressure would rise, but instead is actually dropping over the past 70 years...
YesBTW, if Earth was warming, would there be more wildfires or less??
Some of us just like travel to exotic psyches.Because he's crazy.
It's not to me.It's all Greek to me.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 286
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 231
- Replies
- 39
- Views
- 1K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 43
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 19
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8963
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 495
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-