anyone have a problem with

OK, so that's a ATF form that goes thru a FBI system check.

What does that have to do with DHS that is over E-Verify?

And besides that, Republicans want to put all of the FBI folks in prison.

:huh1:

It will be the same level local cops doing the arrests.


you actually believe LLE will go out and arrest perps for DHS & for FBI violations?

:abgg2q.jpg:

you actually believe LLE will go out and arrest perps for DHS & for FBI violations?

Why DHS?

the locals will arrest those in the companies failing to e-verify.

They should already be arresting those that lie on ATF-4473 forms.

You made this waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more complicated than it ever should have been.

I asked, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I didn't ask who is going to arrest folks.


Again, E-Verify is run by DHS.

The ATF form for the background check (that you brought up) is processed by the FBI.

So, again; who is gonna enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

:spinner::spinner:

:th_spinspin:

Been answered.

quit spinning

No; you haven't answered, nor has anyone within the thread.


Which federal entity will enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

You seem pretty thick headed.
 
:huh1:

It will be the same level local cops doing the arrests.


you actually believe LLE will go out and arrest perps for DHS & for FBI violations?

:abgg2q.jpg:

you actually believe LLE will go out and arrest perps for DHS & for FBI violations?

Why DHS?

the locals will arrest those in the companies failing to e-verify.

They should already be arresting those that lie on ATF-4473 forms.

You made this waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more complicated than it ever should have been.

I asked, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I didn't ask who is going to arrest folks.


Again, E-Verify is run by DHS.

The ATF form for the background check (that you brought up) is processed by the FBI.

So, again; who is gonna enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

:spinner::spinner:

:th_spinspin:

Been answered.

quit spinning

No; you haven't answered.


Which federal entity will enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

You seem pretty thick headed.


Yes I have, fool.


it doesn't take a federal entity if THE LAW IS ON THE BOOKS.


All it takes is local law enforcement.


Do you PRACTICE being a fool anywhere but here?
 
:huh1:

It will be the same level local cops doing the arrests.


you actually believe LLE will go out and arrest perps for DHS & for FBI violations?

:abgg2q.jpg:

you actually believe LLE will go out and arrest perps for DHS & for FBI violations?

Why DHS?

the locals will arrest those in the companies failing to e-verify.

They should already be arresting those that lie on ATF-4473 forms.

You made this waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more complicated than it ever should have been.

I asked, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I didn't ask who is going to arrest folks.


Again, E-Verify is run by DHS.

The ATF form for the background check (that you brought up) is processed by the FBI.

So, again; who is gonna enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

:spinner::spinner:

:th_spinspin:

Been answered.

quit spinning

No; you haven't answered, nor has anyone within the thread.


Which federal entity will enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

You seem pretty thick headed.
ICE
 
you actually believe LLE will go out and arrest perps for DHS & for FBI violations?

:abgg2q.jpg:

you actually believe LLE will go out and arrest perps for DHS & for FBI violations?

Why DHS?

the locals will arrest those in the companies failing to e-verify.

They should already be arresting those that lie on ATF-4473 forms.

You made this waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more complicated than it ever should have been.

I asked, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I didn't ask who is going to arrest folks.


Again, E-Verify is run by DHS.

The ATF form for the background check (that you brought up) is processed by the FBI.

So, again; who is gonna enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

:spinner::spinner:

:th_spinspin:

Been answered.

quit spinning

No; you haven't answered, nor has anyone within the thread.


Which federal entity will enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

You seem pretty thick headed.
ICE

ICE?

Interesting, as I brought that potential up in a previous post when I replied to some dumb ass that claims LLE will enforce a (potential) federal statute.
 
Why DHS?

the locals will arrest those in the companies failing to e-verify.

They should already be arresting those that lie on ATF-4473 forms.

You made this waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more complicated than it ever should have been.

I asked, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I didn't ask who is going to arrest folks.


Again, E-Verify is run by DHS.

The ATF form for the background check (that you brought up) is processed by the FBI.

So, again; who is gonna enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

:spinner::spinner:

:th_spinspin:

Been answered.

quit spinning

No; you haven't answered, nor has anyone within the thread.


Which federal entity will enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

You seem pretty thick headed.
ICE

ICE?

Interesting, as I brought that potential up in a previous post when I replied to some dumb ass that claims LLE will enforce a (potential) federal statute.
If they are certified to do as such local officers can procure federal actions.
 
you actually believe LLE will go out and arrest perps for DHS & for FBI violations?

:abgg2q.jpg:

you actually believe LLE will go out and arrest perps for DHS & for FBI violations?

Why DHS?

the locals will arrest those in the companies failing to e-verify.

They should already be arresting those that lie on ATF-4473 forms.

You made this waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more complicated than it ever should have been.

I asked, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I didn't ask who is going to arrest folks.


Again, E-Verify is run by DHS.

The ATF form for the background check (that you brought up) is processed by the FBI.

So, again; who is gonna enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

:spinner::spinner:

:th_spinspin:

Been answered.

quit spinning

No; you haven't answered.


Which federal entity will enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

You seem pretty thick headed.


Yes I have, fool.


it doesn't take a federal entity if THE LAW IS ON THE BOOKS.


All it takes is local law enforcement.


Do you PRACTICE being a fool anywhere but here?


Hey look dumb ass, I found this with a simple Google search

Form I-9 Inspection Overview

I wasn't under the impression that ICE is LLE aka local law enforcement.

ICE is under the DHS umbrella.

Next time I won't ask some idiot a question about enforcement; I will just Google ..........
 
Last edited:
Why DHS?

the locals will arrest those in the companies failing to e-verify.

They should already be arresting those that lie on ATF-4473 forms.

You made this waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more complicated than it ever should have been.

I asked, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I didn't ask who is going to arrest folks.


Again, E-Verify is run by DHS.

The ATF form for the background check (that you brought up) is processed by the FBI.

So, again; who is gonna enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

:spinner::spinner:

:th_spinspin:

Been answered.

quit spinning

No; you haven't answered.


Which federal entity will enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

You seem pretty thick headed.


Yes I have, fool.


it doesn't take a federal entity if THE LAW IS ON THE BOOKS.


All it takes is local law enforcement.


Do you PRACTICE being a fool anywhere but here?


Hey look dumb ass, I found this with a simple Google search

Form I-9 Inspection Overview

I wasn't under the impression that ICE is LLE aka local law enforcement.

ICE is under the DHS umbrella.

Next time I won't ask some idiot a question about enforcement; I will just Google ..........

Yes, or no, fool...

Can LLE hold criminals for ICE, or other Federal entities?

Google THAT.
 
You made this waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more complicated than it ever should have been.

I asked, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I didn't ask who is going to arrest folks.


Again, E-Verify is run by DHS.

The ATF form for the background check (that you brought up) is processed by the FBI.

So, again; who is gonna enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

:spinner::spinner:

:th_spinspin:

Been answered.

quit spinning

No; you haven't answered.


Which federal entity will enforce a mandatory E-Verify violation?

You seem pretty thick headed.


Yes I have, fool.


it doesn't take a federal entity if THE LAW IS ON THE BOOKS.


All it takes is local law enforcement.


Do you PRACTICE being a fool anywhere but here?


Hey look dumb ass, I found this with a simple Google search

Form I-9 Inspection Overview

I wasn't under the impression that ICE is LLE aka local law enforcement.

ICE is under the DHS umbrella.

Next time I won't ask some idiot a question about enforcement; I will just Google ..........

Yes, or no, fool...

Can LLE hold criminals for ICE, or other Federal entities?

Google THAT.


That is not what I asked
 
Let me guess,

you live in a sanctuary city, and relish your illegal alien neighbors.

Go away, little boy.

Leave the discussion to those that actually care about this country.
 
The decision by Graham to provide a bill to change the procedural law of filing for amnesty finally was thought of. Hell I was saying that sheet three years ago. They be playing this like a three act production.
 
Let me guess,

you live in a sanctuary city, and relish your illegal alien neighbors.

Go away, little boy.

Leave the discussion to those that actually care about this country.


My question was, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I asked not a thing about anyone arresting anyone; that was your input.

Enforcement does not (necessarily) mean arresting anyone.

I found what I needed to know via Google & it looks like they utilize fines; it stated nothing concerning arrests.

You can go back to your third grade class room now; recess is over.
 
Let me guess,

you live in a sanctuary city, and relish your illegal alien neighbors.

Go away, little boy.

Leave the discussion to those that actually care about this country.


My question was, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I asked not a thing about anyone arresting anyone; that was your input.

Enforcement does not (necessarily) mean arresting anyone.

I found what I needed to know via Google & it looks like they utilize fines; it stated nothing concerning arrests.

You can go back to your third grade class room now; recess is over.

You can go back to your third grade class room now; recess is over.

Does that mean you're going back to your kindergarten classroom?

Stop trolling the thread.
 
Let me guess,

you live in a sanctuary city, and relish your illegal alien neighbors.

Go away, little boy.

Leave the discussion to those that actually care about this country.


My question was, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I asked not a thing about anyone arresting anyone; that was your input.

Enforcement does not (necessarily) mean arresting anyone.

I found what I needed to know via Google & it looks like they utilize fines; it stated nothing concerning arrests.

You can go back to your third grade class room now; recess is over.

You can go back to your third grade class room now; recess is over.

Does that mean you're going back to your kindergarten classroom?

Stop trolling the thread.


No one is "trolling the thread"

I asked about ENFORCEMENT

You replied with some BS concerning arrests

that isn't trolling; it's called a discussion, except arresting someone has nothing to do with ICE throwing out fines for violations that NO arrests are made for.

Maybe you should stop your trolling ..........
 
Let me guess,

you live in a sanctuary city, and relish your illegal alien neighbors.

Go away, little boy.

Leave the discussion to those that actually care about this country.


My question was, "So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?"

I asked not a thing about anyone arresting anyone; that was your input.

Enforcement does not (necessarily) mean arresting anyone.

I found what I needed to know via Google & it looks like they utilize fines; it stated nothing concerning arrests.

You can go back to your third grade class room now; recess is over.

You can go back to your third grade class room now; recess is over.

Does that mean you're going back to your kindergarten classroom?

Stop trolling the thread.


No one is "trolling the thread"

I asked about ENFORCEMENT

You replied with some BS concerning arrests

that isn't trolling; it's called a discussion, except arresting someone has nothing to do with ICE throwing out fines for violations that NO arrests are made for.

Maybe you should stop your trolling ..........

and you were answered.

So fucking sorry you didn't LIKE the answer.
 
The owners of Yarabee Farms claimed they used E Verify to vet the status of Mollie Tibbett's killer Cristhian Bahena Rivera.

Well, Yarabee Farms, owned by the family of a prominent Iowa Republican leader, Craig Lang, LIED.
They did NOT use the E Verify system.

So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?
Probably the same people that arrest and detain people that fail firearm background checks, or straw buyers.

Just great!

Like the FBI and Local Law Enforcement have not failed enough!
 
The owners of Yarabee Farms claimed they used E Verify to vet the status of Mollie Tibbett's killer Cristhian Bahena Rivera.

Well, Yarabee Farms, owned by the family of a prominent Iowa Republican leader, Craig Lang, LIED.
They did NOT use the E Verify system.

So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?
Probably the same people that arrest and detain people that fail firearm background checks, or straw buyers.

Just great!

Like the FBI and Local Law Enforcement have not failed enough!


Judge found out a week of so ago it's not wise to let illegal aliens out the back door of her courtroom.

She's the one that ended up in cuffs

needs to happen more often
 
The owners of Yarabee Farms claimed they used E Verify to vet the status of Mollie Tibbett's killer Cristhian Bahena Rivera.

Well, Yarabee Farms, owned by the family of a prominent Iowa Republican leader, Craig Lang, LIED.
They did NOT use the E Verify system.

So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?
Probably the same people that arrest and detain people that fail firearm background checks, or straw buyers.

Just great!

Like the FBI and Local Law Enforcement have not failed enough!


Judge found out a week of so ago it's not wise to let illegal aliens out the back door of her courtroom.

She's the one that ended up in cuffs

needs to happen more often

The thing is the Federal Government fails because they want to fail.

We have laws on the book that can be enforced already and yet people talk about more laws forcing those to enforce the other laws, so when will we learn?

The FBI, ICE and local LEO do not want to do their job until it is photo opportunity time...
 
The owners of Yarabee Farms claimed they used E Verify to vet the status of Mollie Tibbett's killer Cristhian Bahena Rivera.

Well, Yarabee Farms, owned by the family of a prominent Iowa Republican leader, Craig Lang, LIED.
They did NOT use the E Verify system.

So, if it becomes mandatory, who is gonna enforce it?
Probably the same people that arrest and detain people that fail firearm background checks, or straw buyers.

Just great!

Like the FBI and Local Law Enforcement have not failed enough!


Judge found out a week of so ago it's not wise to let illegal aliens out the back door of her courtroom.

She's the one that ended up in cuffs

needs to happen more often

I read about that; she should never be allowed to be a judge, ever again, IMO.
 

Forum List

Back
Top