I am saying a lab experiment is not possible. It cannot be done. A scale model of the atmosphere cannot be made to work. This goes for both weather and climate.
I don't know what you mean by "Protons decay more readily than CO2 rasies temperature in the amounts you allege", but given the atmosphere can't be simulated in a lab then I wonder how you know "Protons decay more readily than CO2 rasies temperature in the amounts you allege" to be the case in the actual atmosphere, unless you accept some other type of evidence than lab experiments?
This is like saying you can't predict planetary orbits because we can't put a planet in a lab.
You are the one who insisted that stuff must be proved in a lab to be science.
Interestingly you now allow an exception for planetary orbits. So I am no longer sure what you are arguing.