Porker
Barack Obama Village Idiot b.1961 Kenya
The entire subject matter of gorebal warming is false, lying and immoral.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If humans could have caused all the shit on this earth that happened naturally like...
The Grand Canyon
The Rocky Mountain Range
The Alps
The Himalayas
The Oceans
The Great Lakes
Bryce Canyon
Death Valley
The Appalachians
The Ozarks
The Smokies
Yellowstone
The Great Yellowstone Caldera, just to name a few...
Then I would buy the global warming bullshit...But we couldn't have even imagined all that much less cause it to happen.
What is the moral basis for climate change denial? Do climate change deniers have any morality? Based on the evidence of global climate change, and the obvious effects this will have on humanity, are climate change deniers in fact immoral?
Climate denial is immoral says head of US Episcopal church Environment The Guardian
I simply don't understand how anyone can look at the evidence of carbon dioxide measurements taken over the years and not see the connection.
I'm also baffled a lack of concern over pollution in general... whether or not the burning of fossil fuels is fucking with the climate notwithstanding... less pollution would be a good thing, no?
If humans could have caused all the shit on this earth that happened naturally like...
The Grand Canyon
The Rocky Mountain Range
The Alps
The Himalayas
The Oceans
The Great Lakes
Bryce Canyon
Death Valley
The Appalachians
The Ozarks
The Smokies
Yellowstone
The Great Yellowstone Caldera, just to name a few...
Then I would buy the global warming bullshit...But we couldn't have even imagined all that much less cause it to happen.
Do you understand why the government made the oil industry spend the money required to produce their product without lead?
Do you understand that carbon dioxide is an invisible gas and that human activity has been pumping billions of tons of the stuff in to the atmosphere every year since the industrial revolution?
If you can watch 'Cosmos' and continue to deny that the human industry of the last hundred years is way different in the way it affects the planetary environment than the human agriculture of the last 10,000 years, we'll have to agree to disagree.
If carbon dioxide was purple instead of clear, this argument would have ended in the 1970's
I simply don't understand how anyone can look at the evidence of carbon dioxide measurements taken over the years and not see the connection.
I'm also baffled a lack of concern over pollution in general... whether or not the burning of fossil fuels is fucking with the climate notwithstanding... less pollution would be a good thing, no?
I simply don't understand how anyone can look at the evidence of carbon dioxide measurements taken over the years and not see the connection.
I'm also baffled a lack of concern over pollution in general... whether or not the burning of fossil fuels is fucking with the climate notwithstanding... less pollution would be a good thing, no?
Who said that the climate doesn't change?What is the moral basis for climate change denial? Do climate change deniers have any morality? Based on the evidence of global climate change, and the obvious effects this will have on humanity, are climate change deniers in fact immoral?
Climate denial is immoral says head of US Episcopal church Environment The Guardian
Is it supernatural?
As if killing Rhinos for their horns or elephants for their tusks ISN'T interfering with nature?
Is it supernatural?
As if killing Rhinos for their horns or elephants for their tusks ISN'T interfering with nature?
I don't understand why people accept a "theory" with no evidence, no experiments, altered data and no warming in 2 decades
How does that work
Faith. It's a doomsday cult.I don't understand why people accept a "theory" with no evidence, no experiments, altered data and no warming in 2 decades
How does that work
I simply don't understand how anyone can look at the evidence of carbon dioxide measurements taken over the years and not see the connection.
I'm also baffled a lack of concern over pollution in general... whether or not the burning of fossil fuels is fucking with the climate notwithstanding... less pollution would be a good thing, no?
What is the moral basis for climate change denial? Do climate change deniers have any morality? Based on the evidence of global climate change, and the obvious effects this will have on humanity, are climate change deniers in fact immoral?
Climate denial is immoral says head of US Episcopal church Environment The Guardian
I disagree with you on morals. ANY group can set morals like the boy scouts or even a family. On the other hand ethics is NOT science yet IS playing a role in this phony global warming scam.What is the moral basis for climate change denial? Do climate change deniers have any morality? Based on the evidence of global climate change, and the obvious effects this will have on humanity, are climate change deniers in fact immoral?
Climate denial is immoral says head of US Episcopal church Environment The Guardian
The second you bring morals into an argument, you have left science at the door. Science is about facts. Truth and morals is the realm of religion.
Republican leaders and all the Republican Internet spammers.Who said that the climate doesn't change?
Another false, lying, immoral interpretation.Climate change deniers whole premise is a lie. In order for the deniers to have any moral or ethical credibility they would have to stop lying about everything all the time. They won't, so they are in fact immoral. Their position is based on deception, innuendo, distortion, and outright lies."The land that the Lord your God cares for. The eyes of the Lord your God are always upon it, from the beginning of the year until the end of the year."
Deuteronomy 11:12
How odd to use the excuse of an imaginary, invisible being to destroy what one believes that imaginary being created.
In order for that to be the case, the left wing lies about AGW would have to be true. They aren't so there's no conflict.
So, I said that the believers were lying and you respond with "The Deniers are lying more?" That's it? Schoolyard gainsaying is all you have? Grow up.