Are Dems even havin debates? or are they all in the Witness Protection Program??

[bedowin62]

Where are the Dem candidates? i cant wait to see 4 rich ol White Progs try to out-pander each other!!!! (rolls eyes)

how many debates do they have scheduled? Why does it seem they dont want the People to know who they really are???

 

[Katzndogz]

They are in the witless protection program.

 

[TheOldSchool]

2 of the same thread from bedowin, and it's not even 9:30. Will he break his record today?

 

[Iceweasel]

They're waiting for CNN to get all of their turd polishing machines tuned up.

 

[Camp]

It makes sense to let the opposition weed through it's abundance of candidates. The Dem's prefer to sit back and watch the damage done while the opposition attacks each other and continues to produce video's that can be used for negative ad's in the future. If the Repub's did not have so many candidates they probably would be holding off and delaying their debates also.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It makes sense to let the opposition weed through it's abundance of candidates. The Dem's prefer to sit back and watch the damage done while the opposition attacks each other and continues to produce video's that can be used for negative ad's in the future. If the Repub's did not have so many candidates they probably would be holding off and delaying their debates also.

No, they're trying to protect the hill since she has a bone closet that would rival the last extinction of the dinosaurs.

 

[bedowin62]

2 of the same thread from bedowin, and it's not even 9:30. Will he break his record today?

you track what i post about and keep a record but i'm the loony one here?

LMAO!

 

[Stephanie]

how sad is that to say to your base? you don't deserve any more than what we give you. so take one of us or leave it.

 

[TheOldSchool]

2 of the same thread from bedowin, and it's not even 9:30. Will he break his record today?

you track what i post about and keep a record but i'm the loony one here?

LMAO!

You post the same thread every day. It's not hard to notice.

 

[easyt65]

"Are Dems even havin debates? or are they all in the Witness Protection Program??"

Now that's funny, right there!

Schultz, who speaks for the entire DNC, has decreed that, in an effort to protect Hillary from having to discuss her criminal and national-security-threatening activity, there will only be 1, maybe 2 debates.

DEBATE DETAILS:

CNN and NPR will host them.

Moderators will consist or select Liberal hosts from the View

All questions will be pre-scripted and given to Hillary 5 days prior.

'Pleading the 5th' will be an acceptable response to any question.

If any candidate so chooses, their lawyer may answer for them.

Questions will be limited to:
- Global Warming
- The New Season of the 'Walking Dead'
- 'Things that Begin With the Letter 'L' '
- 'If you could steal anything out of the White House, what would you Steal?'
- Chinese Restaurant Dining: Chop Sticks or Fork?

 

[Statistikhengst]

bedowin proves that stupidity is indeed a life-long sentence.

Democratic Party presidential debates, 2016 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Poor bedowin.

 

[Camp]

It makes sense to let the opposition weed through it's abundance of candidates. The Dem's prefer to sit back and watch the damage done while the opposition attacks each other and continues to produce video's that can be used for negative ad's in the future. If the Repub's did not have so many candidates they probably would be holding off and delaying their debates also.

No, they're trying to protect the hill since she has a bone closet that would rival the last extinction of the dinosaurs.

If that were true they would want the negative and harmful stuff to come out now, early and with the serious campaigning a year away. It is always wise to get the negative stuff out early. It enables the candidates to refer to it as "old news" when it has the chance to become most harmful, a few months before the election.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It makes sense to let the opposition weed through it's abundance of candidates. The Dem's prefer to sit back and watch the damage done while the opposition attacks each other and continues to produce video's that can be used for negative ad's in the future. If the Repub's did not have so many candidates they probably would be holding off and delaying their debates also.

No, they're trying to protect the hill since she has a bone closet that would rival the last extinction of the dinosaurs.

If that were true they would want the negative and harmful stuff to come out now, early and with the serious campaigning a year away. It is always wise to get the negative stuff out early. It enables the candidates to refer to it as "old news" when it has the chance to become most harmful, a few months before the election.

These candidates don't have the negative stuff, albatrosses, hanging around them like hillary does.

 

[g5000]

Why should Democrats have debates while the Republican candidates are cutting each others' throats? That would be stupid.

You'd think the Pubs would have learned from the 2012 cycle what a colossal mistake that was.

 

[bedowin62]

bedowin proves that stupidity is indeed a life-long sentence.

Democratic Party presidential debates, 2016 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Poor bedowin.

your source makes my point for me idiot

thanks!!

 

[bedowin62]

The Democratic National Committee announced on May 5, 2015 that there would be just six debates, in stark contrast to the 26 debates and forums that were held for the 2008 presidential election.[1] On August 6, 2015 the Democratic National Committee announced the locations for all six debates (with venues to be determined) and the dates for the first four debates.[2]

from your own source idiot.......................


lol

 

[blackhawk]

I think the Dems are supposed to have the first one next month it will be interesting to see how many tune in to see a debate featuring Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Martin O' Malley, Lincoln Chafee, and Jim Webb.

 

[bedowin62]

Why should Democrats have debates while the Republican candidates are cutting each others' throats? That would be stupid.

You'd think the Pubs would have learned from the 2012 cycle what a colossal mistake that was.

they has already planned to have much fewer debates than Democrat debates in previoius elections

thanks for your input though

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I think the Dems are supposed to have the first one next month it will be interesting to see how many tune in to see a debate featuring Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Martin O' Malley, Lincoln Chafee, and Jim Webb.

You'll need some serious uppers to stay awake for that jv group.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

They have 8 debates scheduled i believe. Sanders & Omally were bitching that limiting debates is the dnc trying to protect Hillary